Abstract
IT is very idle as a rule to criticize a critic, especially when he happens, like C. G. K., to be the disciple of a school which the author of the criticized work is gently laughing at throughout his pages. But some of C. G. K.'s remarks might lead your readers to believe that the “Grammar of Science” is nonsense, even when looked at without the spectacles of the Edinburgh physical school, and his review may therefore justly call for a few words of reply.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PEARSON, K. “The Grammar of Science”. Nature 46, 199–200 (1892). https://doi.org/10.1038/046199c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/046199c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.