Abstract
THE REVIEWER IF I may argue from the contents of Mr. Davis's book, he should be a good judge of what constitutes “falling into a common mistake,” and yet I cannot accept his opinion as to my having accomplished this feat. I have refrained from enumerating the common mistakes which his little book contains, but I am not prepared to allow him to lay down the law as to educational methods. In my opinion it is a grievous error to present any subject of study to University students under two aspects, that of “pass” and that of “honours.” Whatever is worth doing at all (in academic exercises) is worth doing well, and no regulations sanctioned by any University Senate—however philanthropic, incompetent, and imperial—can make the perennial iteration of the statements in a cram-book concerning six plants and six animals a satisfactory substitute for the study of zoological and botanical science, or anything but a pernicious torturing of the youthful mind.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis's “Biology”. Nature 38, 149 (1888). https://doi.org/10.1038/038149c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/038149c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.