Abstract
OF the great value of Prof. Rosenbusch's work on petrology, so excellently reviewed by Dr. Hatch, to which your correspondent “A. B.” draws attention, there can be no doubt, so far as it is regarded as a storehouse of information; but whether the system of classification proposed therein will not tend to retard rather than to further progress is a question on which I am at present more than doubtful. The two points to which Dr. Hatch and your correspondent draw attention as inherent weaknesses—viz. the “dyke rocks,” and the subdivision of the “effusive rocks” into palæo-volcanic and neo-volcanic—appear to me such serious defects, that to praise a system which largely rests on them is like complimenting a viaduct by saying that it is an excellent viaduct but two of its piers unfortunately have a bad foundation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BONNEY, T. Prof. Rosenbusch's Work on Petrology. Nature 37, 556–557 (1888). https://doi.org/10.1038/037556d0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/037556d0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.