Abstract
CAPTAIN WHARTON in his interesting paper satisfactorily explains a condition of reef-growth previously little known and but imperfectly understood. I was pleased to learn that Mr. Bourne's long-expected account of Diego Garcia will soon be published. His remarks concerning the directing influence of currents agree closely with those of Semper (“Animal Life,” vol. xxxi. Internat. Sci. Ser. p. 228). Of the importance of this agency there can, I think, be no doubt; but solution is also an important agency within the lagoon, and one more capable of actual demonstration than the directing force of the currents. But amongst the supporters of the anti-subsidence theory of Murray there is a difference of opinion as to the relative importance to be attached to solution; and we cannot accept the name of “theory of solution” for the new view if it is intended to exclude the other agencies that previously cause the death of the coral, such as the repressive influence of sand, the diminished food-supply, the tidal scour, &c. With this exclusive meaning, the name “theory of solution” would contradict itself, and we should be regarding the problem in much the same light as if we were solely to contemplate the mystery of our own existence from the point of view of the undertaker.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GUPPY, H. Coral Formations. Nature 37, 462 (1888). https://doi.org/10.1038/037462b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/037462b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.