Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Law of Error

Abstract

EVERYONE interested in the theory of statistics is aware how strongly Quetelet was under the conviction that there is only one law of error (or curve of facility, to use the corresponding expression for the graphical representation of the law) prevalent for the departure from the mean of a number of magnitudes or measurements of any natural phenomenon. I have done what I can to protest against this doctrine as a theoretic assumption; and recently Mr. F. Galton and Mr. F. Y. Edgeworth have shown in some very interesting and valuable papers in the Philosophical Magazine and elsewhere how untenable it is, and how great is the importance of studying the properties of other laws of error than the symmetrical binomial, and its limiting form the exponential.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VENN, J. The Law of Error. Nature 36, 411–412 (1887). https://doi.org/10.1038/036411c0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/036411c0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing