Abstract
THE writer of a very long and exhaustive article on “The Heart,” occupying forty-one pages in Rees's “Cyclopædia,” quotes, among other authorities, Bichat, who says “that the blood, when it has arrived at the veins, is no longer influenced by the heart's action; consequently these vessels have no pulsation” ... “that the blood's return in the veins is involved in an obscurity;” and he propounds as a “contrast” “the fact of general pulsation in the arteries, the absence of this in the veins.” The writer of the article states that “many authors, particularly Haller, considering that this [the venous] system has no agent of propulsion, have ascribed to the veins some peculiar structure” of which the evidence is insufficient; also “that there is no analogy to the course of the blood in the arteries where the action of the heart produces the whole effect,” and adds: “There is much obscurity on the subject, as well as in the course of the blood in the general veins; and every judicious mind cannot fail to observe that there is a great vacuum to be filled up.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HIPPISLEY, J. Pulsation in the Veins . Nature 32, 389–390 (1885). https://doi.org/10.1038/032389c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/032389c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.