Abstract
ACCORDING to the regulations of the Cambridge Local Examinations, 1883, junior students can alone take botany, while senior students must take elementary biology instead. What has been the result? Taking the Regent's Park centre as a typical example, for it is a single school of several hundred girls, and sends up probably more than any other school in England, we find that from 1872 to 1882, inclusive, 273 senior students entered, and 191, or 70 per cent, passed in botany. In 1883, however, none were sent up at all. If we ask, What is the object of teaching science in schools? the answer is obviously for its educational value. Now this can only be acquired by practical study. Botany is eminently qualified for affording this use, whereas zoology is not. The lady principal of the school in question will not entertain the idea of teaching any branch of science if it cannot be taught practically, and very pertinently asks, “How can I get two to three hundred frogs, and make my girls dissect them? In the first place, the parents would not allow it.” Consequently biology becomes a dead letter, and botany is discountenanced by the Syndicate for the elder girls.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HENSLOW, G. Biology v Botany. Nature 30, 537–538 (1884). https://doi.org/10.1038/030537c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/030537c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.