Abstract
FROM Mr. Hannay's letter (NATURE, vol. xxii. p. 483) and from private communications I have received it appears there has been a little misconception as to the manner in which I judged of the temperature of the ice in the experiment referred to in NATURE, ibid., 435. Mr. Hannay's theory, that the ice was protected from the hot glass by an intervening layer of vapour, at first occurred to myself and to others as the true explanation of the phenomenon, but that this explanation will not serve in the present case is, I think, proved by the fact that a thermometer was imbedded in the ice and rose to temperatures varying in different experiments between 120° and 180° C., at which points the ice had either all volatilised or had become detached from the bulb. This appears improbable from our present ideas concerning latent heat, but it is nevertheless a fact. If I can make the necessary arrangements it is my intention to show the experiment at an early meeting of the Chemical Society, when it will be open to criticism.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CARNELLEY, T. Ice at High Temperatures. Nature 22, 510–511 (1880). https://doi.org/10.1038/022510b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/022510b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.