Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Miscellany
  • Published:

Notes

Abstract

THE voluminous correspondence connected with the management of Kew Gardens, printed by order of Parliament, was issued at the close of last week. In the debate in the House of Lords on Monday, introduced by Lord Derby, the essential points of the controversy were hardly touched; and pending the debate in the House of Commons on Sir John Lubbock's motion, which was not reached on Tuesday evening, it is obviously premature to enter into the various discussions which are prompted by the contents of the Parliamentary papers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Notes . Nature 6, 268–270 (1872). https://doi.org/10.1038/006268a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/006268a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing