Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Fuel of the Sun

Abstract

IN your impression of October 6 Mr. Murphy adds another to the frequent attempts that are still made to galvanise the expiring hypothesis that attributes the solar heat and light to a meteoric bombardment. Many very strong and sufficient objections have been already brought against it, but as Mr. Murphy states that he is “not mathematician enough to form any opinion on the merits of the controversy,” I will add two arguments which to my mind are quite sufficient to annihilate this explanation—both of which may be sufficiently understood without mathematics, and neither of which have I ever seen fairly stated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WILLIAMS, W. The Fuel of the Sun. Nature 3, 26–27 (1870). https://doi.org/10.1038/003026a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/003026a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing