Key Points
-
Transcription at the operon level is discussed as a regulatory mechanism, and can be divided into two distinct phases: initiation and elongation. Initiation differs significantly between prokaryotes and eukaryotes, whereas elongation is very similar.
-
Elongation, and its regulatory control, can be described in thermodynamic and kinetic terms, and many of these mechanisms can now be considered in terms of defined structural interactions within the RNA polymerase of the transcription complex and with its various transcriptional cofactors.
-
The transcription complex can choose between several alternative reaction pathways at each template position. These pathways include continued elongation, as well as pyrophosphorolysis, editing, termination, and short- and long-term pausing.
-
These potential reaction pathways are in kinetic competition with one another, and the outcome of this competition at any given template position can be described in terms of the relative heights of the free energy of activation barriers that lead into these various pathways.
-
Transcription factors can selectively modulate these relative barrier heights, and can therefore potentially redirect transcription down any of these different pathways. Elongation is the default pathway, and transcription pauses of defined lengths and various structural origins are generally required to allow other reaction pathways to be used.
-
Much mechanistic and structural information is available concerning the elongation, editing, termination and pyrophosphorolysis pathways, and how the elongation complex chooses between them.
-
Understanding the mechanisms of regulation of transcript elongation in Escherichia coli can function as a model for transcriptional control in higher organisms and in various developmental and disease states.
Abstract
By thinking about the chemical and physical mechanisms that are involved in the stepwise elongation of RNA transcripts, we can begin to understand the way that these mechanisms are controlled within the cell to reflect the different requirements for transcription that are posed by various metabolic, developmental and disease states. Here, we focus on the mechanistic details of the single-nucleotide addition (or excision) cycle in the transcription process, as this is the level at which many regulatory mechanisms function and can be explained in quantitative terms.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Toulme, F. et al. GreA and GreB proteins revive backtracked RNA polymerase in vivo by promoting transcript trimming. EMBO J. 19, 6853–6859 (2000).
Mosrin-Huaman, C., Turnbough, C. L. Jr & Rahmouni, A. R. Translocation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase against a protein roadblock in vivo highlights a passive sliding mechanism for transcript elongation. Mol. Microbiol. 51, 1471–1481 (2004).
Bar-Nahum, G. & Nudler, E. Isolation and characterization of σ70-retaining transcription elongation complexes from Escherichia coli. Cell 106, 443–451 (2001).
Mukhopadhyay, J. et al. Translocation of σ70 with RNA polymerase during transcription: fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay for movement relative to DNA. Cell 106, 453–463 (2001).
von Hippel, P. H. Helicases become mechanistically simpler and functionally more complex. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 494–496 (2004).
von Hippel, P. H. & Delagoutte, E. A general model for nucleic acid helicases and their 'coupling' within macromolecular machines. Cell 104, 177–190 (2001).
Delagoutte, E. & von Hippel, P. H. Helicase mechanisms and the coupling of helicases within macromolecular machines. Part II: integration of helicases into cellular processes. Q. Rev. Biophys. 36, 1–69 (2003).
Zaychikov, E., Denissova, L. & Heumann, H. Translocation of the Escherichia coli transcription complex observed in the registers 11 to 20: 'jumping' of RNA polymerase and asymmetric expansion and contraction of the 'transcription bubble'. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 1739–1743 (1995).
Nudler, E., Avetissova, E., Markovtsov, V. & Goldfarb, A. Transcription processivity: protein–DNA interactions holding together the elongation complex. Science 273, 211–217 (1996).
Nudler, E., Gusarov, I., Avetissova, E., Kozlov, M. & Goldfarb, A. Spatial organization of transcription elongation complex in Escherichia coli. Science 281, 424–428 (1998).
Korzheva, N. et al. A structural model of transcription elongation. Science 289, 619–625 (2000).
Nudler, E., Mustaev, A., Lukhtanov, E. & Goldfarb, A. The RNA–DNA hybrid maintains the register of transcription by preventing backtracking of RNA polymerase. Cell 89, 33–41 (1997).
Sidorenkov, I., Komissarova, N. & Kashlev, M. Crucial role of the RNA:DNA hybrid in the processivity of transcription. Mol. Cell 2, 55–64 (1998).
Monforte, J. A., Kahn, J. D. & Hearst, J. E. RNA folding during transcription by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase analyzed by RNA self-cleavage. Biochemistry 29, 7882–7890 (1990).
Reeder, T. C. & Hawley, D. K. Promoter proximal sequences modulate RNA polymerase II elongation by a novel mechanism. Cell 87, 767–777 (1996).
Komissarova, N. & Kashlev, M. Transcriptional arrest: Escherichia coli RNA polymerase translocates backward, leaving the 3′ end of the RNA intact and extruded. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1755–1760 (1997).
Komissarova, N. & Kashlev, M. Functional topography of nascent RNA in elongation intermediates of RNA polymerase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14699–14704 (1998).
Yager, T. D. & von Hippel, P. H. A thermodynamic analysis of RNA transcript elongation and termination in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 30, 1097–1118 (1991). Presents a thermodynamic analysis of the formation of transcription complexes.
Pasman, Z. & von Hippel, P. H. Active Escherichia coli transcription elongation complexes are functionally homogeneous. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 505–519 (2002).
Zhang, G. et al. Crystal structure of Thermus aquaticus core RNA polymerase at 3.3 Å resolution. Cell 98, 811–824 (1999).
Ebright, R. H. RNA polymerase: structural similarities between bacterial RNA polymerase and eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. J. Mol. Biol. 304, 687–698 (2000).
Markov, D., Naryshkina, T., Mustaev, A. & Severinov, K. A zinc-binding site in the largest subunit of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase is involved in enzyme assembly. Genes Dev. 13, 2439–2448 (1999).
Vassylyev, D. G. et al. Crystal structure of a bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme at 2.6 Å resolution. Nature 417, 712–719 (2002).
King, R. A., Markov, D., Sen, R., Severinov, K. & Weisberg, R. A. A conserved zinc binding domain in the largest subunit of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase modulates intrinsic transcription termination and antitermination but does not stabilize the elongation complex. J. Mol. Biol. 342, 1143–1154 (2004).
Gnatt, A. L., Cramer, P., Fu, J., Bushnell, D. A. & Kornberg, R. D. Structural basis of transcription: an RNA polymerase II elongation complex at 3.3 Å resolution. Science 292, 1876–1882 (2001). Describes the structure of an elongating RNA polymerase including the transcription bubble, the RNA–DNA hybrid and the RNA-polymerase active site.
Epshtein, V. et al. Swing-gate model of nucleotide entry into the RNA polymerase active center. Mol. Cell 10, 623–634 (2002).
Westover, K. D., Bushnell, D. A. & Kornberg, R. D. Structural basis of transcription: separation of RNA from DNA by RNA polymerase II. Science 303, 1014–1016 (2004).
Cramer, P. et al. Architecture of RNA polymerase II and implications for the transcription mechanism. Science 288, 640–649 (2000).
Opalka, N. et al. Structure and function of the transcription elongation factor GreB bound to bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell 114, 335–345 (2003). Structural demonstration of the binding of GreB to RNA polymerase and the mechanism of RNA-chain cleavage during editing.
Cramer, P., Bushnell, D. A. & Kornberg, R. D. Structural basis of transcription: RNA polymerase II at 2.8 angstrom resolution. Science 292, 1863–1876 (2001).
Sosunov, V. et al. Unified two-metal mechanism of RNA synthesis and degradation by RNA polymerase. EMBO J. 22, 2234–2244 (2003). Provides evidence to support a two-metal-ion active site in RNA polymerase.
Kuznedelov, K., Korzheva, N., Mustaev, A. & Severinov, K. Structure-based analysis of RNA polymerase function: the largest subunit's rudder contributes critically to elongation complex stability and is not involved in the maintenance of RNA–DNA hybrid length. EMBO J. 21, 1369–1378 (2002).
Toulokhonov, I. & Landick, R. The flap domain is required for pause RNA hairpin inhibition of catalysis by RNA polymerase and can modulate intrinsic termination. Mol. Cell 12, 1125–1136 (2003).
von Hippel, P. H. & Delagoutte, E. Macromolecular complexes that unwind nucleic acids. Bioessays 25, 1168–1177 (2003).
Erie, D. A., Yager, T. D. & von Hippel, P. H. The single-nucleotide addition cycle in transcription: a biophysical and biochemical perspective. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 21, 379–415 (1992). Provides mechanistic details of the single-nucleotide-addition and -excision cycle.
Hopfield, J. J. Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 4135–4139 (1974).
Komissarova, N. & Kashlev, M. RNA polymerase switches between inactivated and activated states by translocating back and forth along the DNA and the RNA. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15329–15338 (1997).
Guajardo, R., Lopez, P., Dreyfus, M. & Sousa, R. NTP concentration effects on initial transcription by T7 RNAP indicate that translocation occurs through passive sliding and reveal that divergent promoters have distinct NTP concentration requirements for productive initiation. J. Mol. Biol. 281, 777–792 (1998).
Bai, L., Shundrovsky, A. & Wang, M. D. Sequence-dependent kinetic model for transcription elongation by RNA polymerase. J. Mol. Biol. 344, 335–349 (2004).
Erie, D. A., Hajiseyedjavadi, O., Young, M. C. & von Hippel, P. H. Multiple RNA polymerase conformations and GreA: control of the fidelity of transcription. Science 262, 867–873 (1993).
Thomas, M. J., Platas, A. A. & Hawley, D. K. Transcriptional fidelity and proofreading by RNA polymerase II. Cell 93, 627–637 (1998).
Borukhov, S., Polyakov, A., Nikiforov, V. & Goldfarb, A. GreA protein: a transcription elongation factor from Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 8899–8902 (1992).
Borukhov, S., Sagitov, V. & Goldfarb, A. Transcript cleavage factors from E. coli. Cell 72, 459–466 (1993).
Orlova, M., Newlands, J., Das, A., Goldfarb, A. & Borukhov, S. Intrinsic transcript cleavage activity of RNA polymerase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 4596–4600 (1995).
Laptenko, O., Lee, J., Lomakin, I. & Borukhov, S. Transcript cleavage factors GreA and GreB act as transient catalytic components of RNA polymerase. EMBO J. 22, 6322–6334 (2003).
Sosunova, E. et al. Donation of catalytic residues to RNA polymerase active center by transcription factor Gre. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15469–15474 (2003).
Neuman, K. C., Abbondanzieri, E. A., Landick, R., Gelles, J. & Block, S. M. Ubiquitous transcriptional pausing is independent of RNA polymerase backtracking. Cell 115, 437–447 (2003). Discusses the role of pauses in the regulation of transcription.
Shaevitz, J. W., Abbondanzieri, E. A., Landick, R. & Block, S. M. Backtracking by single RNA polymerase molecules observed at near-base-pair resolution. Nature 426, 684–687 (2003).
Artsimovitch, I. & Landick, R. Pausing by bacterial RNA polymerase is mediated by mechanistically distinct classes of signals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7090–7095 (2000).
Martin, F. H. & Tinoco, I. Jr. DNA–RNA hybrid duplexes containing oligo(dA:rU) sequences are exceptionally unstable and may facilitate termination of transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 2295–2299 (1980).
Wilson, K. S. & von Hippel, P. H. Stability of Escherichia coli transcription complexes near an intrinsic terminator. J. Mol. Biol. 244, 36–51 (1994).
Toulokhonov, I., Artsimovitch, I. & Landick, R. Allosteric control of RNA polymerase by a site that contacts nascent RNA hairpins. Science 292, 730–733 (2001).
Gusarov, I. & Nudler, E. The mechanism of intrinsic transcription termination. Mol. Cell 3, 495–504 (1999).
Komissarova, N., Becker, J., Solter, S., Kireeva, M. & Kashlev, M. Shortening of RNA:DNA hybrid in the elongation complex of RNA polymerase is a prerequisite for transcription termination. Mol. Cell 10, 1151–1162 (2002).
Yarnell, W. S. & Roberts, J. W. Mechanism of intrinsic transcription termination and antitermination. Science 284, 611–615 (1999).
Ryder, A. M. & Roberts, J. W. Role of the non-template strand of the elongation bubble in intrinsic transcription termination. J. Mol. Biol. 334, 205–213 (2003).
Santangelo, T. J., Mooney, R. A., Landick, R. & Roberts, J. W. RNA polymerase mutations that impair conversion to a termination-resistant complex by Q antiterminator proteins. Genes Dev. 17, 1281–1292 (2003).
Brennan, C. A., Dombroski, A. J. & Platt, T. Transcription termination factor rho is an RNA–DNA helicase. Cell 48, 945–952 (1987).
Jin, D. J., Burgess, R. R., Richardson, J. P. & Gross, C. A. Termination efficiency at rho-dependent terminators depends on kinetic coupling between RNA polymerase and rho. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1453–1457 (1992).
Walstrom, K. M., Dozono, J. M., Robic, S. & von Hippel, P. H. Kinetics of the RNA–DNA helicase activity of Escherichia coli transcription termination factor rho. 1. Characterization and analysis of the reaction. Biochemistry 36, 7980–7992 (1997).
Walstrom, K. M., Dozono, J. M. & von Hippel, P. H. Kinetics of the RNA–DNA helicase activity of Escherichia coli transcription termination factor rho. 2. Processivity, ATP consumption, and RNA binding. Biochemistry 36, 7993–8004 (1997).
Zhu, A. Q. & von Hippel, P. H. Rho-dependent termination within the trp t′ terminator. II. Effects of kinetic competition and rho processivity. Biochemistry 37, 11215–11222 (1998).
Zhu, A. Q. & von Hippel, P. H. Rho-dependent termination within the trp t′ terminator. I. Effects of rho loading and template sequence. Biochemistry 37, 11202–11214 (1998).
Walmacq, C., Rahmouni, A. R. & Boudvillain, M. Influence of substrate composition on the helicase activity of transcription termination factor Rho: reduced processivity of Rho hexamers during unwinding of RNA–DNA hybrid regions. J. Mol. Biol. 342, 403–420 (2004).
Greenblatt, J., McLimont, M. & Hanly, S. Termination of transcription by nusA gene protein of Escherichia coli. Nature 292, 215–220 (1981).
Li, J., Horwitz, R., McCracken, S. & Greenblatt, J. NusG, a new Escherichia coli elongation factor involved in transcriptional antitermination by the N protein of phage λ. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6012–6019 (1992).
Sullivan, S. L. & Gottesman, M. E. Requirement for E. coli NusG protein in factor-dependent transcription termination. Cell 68, 989–994 (1992).
Nehrke, K. W., Zalatan, F. & Platt, T. NusG alters rho-dependent termination of transcription in vitro independent of kinetic coupling. Gene Expr. 3, 119–133 (1993).
Mason, S. W. & Greenblatt, J. Assembly of transcription elongation complexes containing the N protein of phage λ and the Escherichia coli elongation factors NusA, NusB, NusG, and S10. Genes Dev. 5, 1504–1512 (1991).
Das, A. et al. Components of multiprotein–RNA complex that controls transcription elongation in Escherichia coli phage λ. Methods Enzymol. 274, 374–402 (1996).
Nodwell, J. R. & Greenblatt, J. Recognition of boxA antiterminator RNA by the E. coli antitermination factors NusB and ribosomal protein S10. Cell 72, 261–268 (1993).
Torres, M., Condon, C., Balada, J. M., Squires, C. & Squires, C. L. Ribosomal protein S4 is a transcription factor with properties remarkably similar to NusA, a protein involved in both non-ribosomal and ribosomal RNA antitermination. EMBO J. 20, 3811–3820 (2001).
Vogel, U. & Jensen, K. F. NusA is required for ribosomal antitermination and for modulation of the transcription elongation rate of both antiterminated RNA and mRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12265–12271 (1997).
Glasstone, S., Laidler, K. & Eyring, H. The Theory of Rate Processes (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1941).
von Hippel, P. H. & Yager, T. D. Transcript elongation and termination are competitive kinetic processes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 2307–2311 (1991). Sets up the transition-state approach to transcription kinetics.
von Hippel, P. H. & Pasman, Z. Reaction pathways in transcript elongation. Biophys. Chem. 101–102, 401–423 (2002). Provides a detailed discussion of the alternative reaction pathways in transcription.
Rees, W., Weitzel, S., Das, A. & von Hippel, P. Regulation of the elongation–termination decision at intrinsic terminators by antitermination protein N of phage λ. J. Mol. Biol. 273, 797–893 (1997).
Levin, J. R. & Chamberlin, M. J. Mapping and characterization of transcriptional pause sites in the early genetic region of bacteriophage T7. J. Mol. Biol. 196, 61–84 (1987).
Arndt, K. M. & Chamberlin, M. J. Transcription termination in Escherichia coli. Measurement of the rate of enzyme release from Rho-independent terminators. J. Mol. Biol. 202, 271–285 (1988).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to our colleagues at the University of Oregon and elsewhere for many stimulating discussions of the concepts presented here. The preparation of this article was supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health research grants (to P.H.v.H.) and by an American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship (to S.J.G.). P.H.v.H. is an American Cancer Society Research Professor of Chemistry.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Glossary
- PROMOTER
-
A DNA-binding site for RNA polymerase at which gene transcription can be initiated.
- TERMINATION
-
A reaction that occurs at terminator sites on the DNA template and that stops transcription by dissociating the transcription complex and releasing the nascent RNA into solution.
- TRANSCRIPTION BUBBLE
-
A stretch of 12–14 bp that is melted within the dsDNA as a consequence of transcription-complex formation. The transcription bubble exposes the DNA template strand that is then copied by RNA polymerase to form complementary RNA.
- RNA–DNA HYBRID
-
The double-stranded, 8–9-bp helix that forms within the transcription bubble when the 3′ end of the nascent RNA transcript interacts with the complementary sequence of the template.
- SIGMA FACTOR
-
(σ factor). A promoter-specific transcription factor in prokaryotes that binds to core RNA polymerase and directs the binding of the resulting holoenzyme to a specific promoter or family of promoters.
- FIDELITY
-
A measure of the accuracy with which the template sequence is copied into the complementary nascent RNA or DNA strand.
- PROCESSIVITY
-
A measure of the average number of nucleotides that a template-dependent polymerase incorporates into a growing RNA or DNA chain before dissociating from the template DNA. Regulation of the processivity of a polymerase might involve interactions of regulatory factors with its sliding-clamp domain.
- EDITING
-
The process of correcting a misincorporation event by cleaving a short oligonucleotide sequence that contains the misincorporated residue from the 3′ end of the elongating transcript.
- PYROPHOSPHOROLYSIS
-
A chemical process that results in the sequential removal of single nucleotides from the 3′ end of the nascent RNA. It represents the direct chemical reversal of the single-nucleotide-addition reaction.
- ANTITERMINATION
-
A process that decreases termination efficiency at a given terminator by increasing the rate of transcription by the RNA polymerase or by stabilizing the elongation complex, or both.
- SLIDING CLAMP
-
A domain or protein ring that forms part of the DNA-replication complex. It holds (or 'clamps') the replication polymerase to the DNA template at the primer–template junction within the replication fork. In transcription, this function is carried out by the 'pincer' domain of the 'crab-claw' region of the RNA polymerase. These pincers clamp the dsDNA downstream of the moving transcription bubble and control the processivity of the transcription complex.
- KINETIC COMPETITION
-
The competition that is seen between different reactions during a process that can proceed down several bifurcating reaction pathways, for which the outcome depends on the relative rate constants of the potentially competing reactions. Alteration (for example, by transcription-factor binding) of the relative heights of the free energy of activation barriers that lead into the various reaction pathways can change the outcome of the process.
- FREE ENERGY OF ACTIVATION BARRIER
-
An idea derived from transition-state theory that defines the input of free energy that is needed to allow a given reaction to proceed.
- BOLTZMANN DISTRIBUTION
-
Describes how the total energy (or free energy, in this case) that is available for a reaction is divided among the population of molecules or pathways that are available within the system.
- ISOENERGETIC REACTION PROCESS
-
A process in which the beginning and ending states have equivalent energies (or free energies).
- SLIDING–ZIPPERING
-
The diffusion-driven process through which the elongation complex — which comprises the transcription bubble, the RNA–DNA hybrid and the RNA polymerase — translocates backwards and forwards along (and through) the DNA genome.
- BACK-SLIDING
-
The process by which RNA polymerase might become detached from the 3′ end of the elongating RNA, and is translocated 'backwards' (upstream) by diffusion along the nucleic-acid framework towards the promoter, in response to regulatory signals or events during transcription elongation.
- EXONUCLEASE
-
An enzyme that catalyses the cleavage of a single residue from the end of an oligonucletide strand. The term 'exonuclease-like' indicates that the enzyme might remove more than one residue at a time from the end of the chain.
- MISINCORPORATION
-
The addition of an incorrect (as defined by the complementary DNA template) nucleotide at the 3′ end of the nascent transcript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greive, S., von Hippel, P. Thinking quantitatively about transcriptional regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6, 221–232 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1588
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1588
This article is cited by
-
Stochastic model of ERK-mediated progesterone receptor translocation, clustering and transcriptional activity
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Synthetic protein quality control to enhance full-length translation in bacteria
Nature Chemical Biology (2021)
-
Clusters of hairpins induce intrinsic transcription termination in bacteria
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Pause sequences facilitate entry into long-lived paused states by reducing RNA polymerase transcription rates
Nature Communications (2018)
-
CBR antimicrobials alter coupling between the bridge helix and the β subunit in RNA polymerase
Nature Communications (2014)