Is there an inherent conflict between public debate and free scientific inquiry? Patrick L. Taylor argues that earning public trust is essential to defending scientific freedoms.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Jasanoff, S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 2005).
http://www.vcu.edu/lifesci/images2/ls_survey_2006_report.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, P. Rules of engagement. Nature 450, 163–164 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/450163a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/450163a
This article is cited by
-
Analytical chemistry as a tool for suppressing chemophobia: an introduction to the 5E-principle
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly (2018)
-
Using electronic health records to drive discovery in disease genomics
Nature Reviews Genetics (2011)
-
Scientific Self-Regulation—So Good, How Can it Fail?
Science and Engineering Ethics (2009)