Abstract
Patient–physician interactions significantly contribute to placebo effects and clinical outcomes. While the neural correlates of placebo responses have been studied in patients, the neurobiology of the clinician during treatment is unknown. This study investigated physicians’ brain activations during patient–physician interaction while the patient was experiencing pain, including a ‘treatment‘, ‘no-treatment’ and ‘control’ condition. Here, we demonstrate that physicians activated brain regions previously implicated in expectancy for pain–relief and increased attention during treatment of patients, including the right ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. The physician’s ability to take the patients’ perspective correlated with increased brain activations in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex, a region that has been associated with processing of reward and subjective value. We suggest that physician treatment involves neural representations of treatment expectation, reward processing and empathy, paired with increased activation in attention-related structures. Our findings further the understanding of the neural representations associated with reciprocal interactions between clinicians and patients; a hallmark for successful treatment outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Finniss DG, Benedetti F . Mechanisms of the placebo response and their impact on clinical trials and clinical practice. Pain 2005; 114: 3–6.
Kaptchuk TJ, Kelley JM, Conboy LA, Davis RB, Kerr CE, Jacobson EE et al. Components of placebo effect: randomised controlled trial in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. BMJ 2008; 336: 999–1003.
Pollo A, Amanzio M, Arslanian A, Casadio C, Maggi G, Benedetti F . Response expectancies in placebo analgesia and their clinical relevance. Pain 2001; 93: 77–84.
Rief W, Nestoriuc Y, Weiss S, Welzel E, Barsky AJ, Hofmann SG . Meta-analysis of the placebo response in antidepressant trials. J Affect Disord 2009; 118: 1–8.
Wechsler ME, Kelley JM, Boyd IO, Dutile S, Marigowda G, Kirsch I et al. Active albuterol or placebo, sham acupuncture, or no intervention in asthma. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 119–126.
McKay KM, Imel ZE, Wampold BE . Psychiatrist effects in the psychopharmacological treatment of depression. J Affect Disord 2006; 92: 287–290.
Bingel U, Lorenz J, Schoell E, Weiller C, Büchel C . Mechanisms of placebo analgesia: rACC recruitment of a subcortical antinociceptive network. Pain 2006; 120: 8–15.
Eippert F, Bingel U, Schoell ED, Yacubian J, Klinger R, Lorenz J et al. Activation of the opioidergic descending pain control system underlies placebo analgesia. Neuron 2009; 63: 533–543.
Kong J, Gollub RL, Rosman IS, Webb JM, Vangel MG, Kirsch I et al. Brain activity associated with expectancy-enhanced placebo analgesia as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 381–388.
Petrovic P, Kalso E, Petersson KM, Ingvar M . Placebo and opioid analgesia–imaging a shared neuronal network. Science 2002; 295: 1737–1740.
Wager TD, Rilling JK, Smith EE, Sokolik A, Casey KL, Davidson RJ et al. Placebo-induced changes in fMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain. Science 2004; 303: 1162–1167.
Zubieta J-K, Bueller JA, Jackson LR, Scott DJ, Xu Y, Koeppe RA et al. Placebo effects mediated by endogenous opioid activity on {micro}-opioid receptors. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 7754–7762.
Leuchter AF, Cook IA, Witte EA, Morgan M, Abrams M . Changes in brain function of depressed subjects during treatment with placebo. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 122–129.
Mayberg HS, Silva JA, Brannan SK, Tekell JL, Mahurin RK, McGinnis S et al. The functional neuroanatomy of the placebo effect. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 728–737.
Petrovic P, Dietrich T, Fransson P, Andersson J, Carlsson K, Ingvar M . Placebo in emotional processing—induced expectations of anxiety relief activate a generalized modulatory network. Neuron 2005; 46: 957–969.
de la Fuente-Fernandez R, Ruth T, Sossi V, Schulzer M, Calne D, Stoessl A . Expectation and dopamine release: mechanism of the placebo effect in Parkinson’s disease. Science 2001; 293: 1164–1166.
Petrovic P, Kalso E, Petersson KM, Andersson J, Fransson P, Ingvar M . A prefrontal non-opioid mechanism in placebo analgesia. Pain 2010; 150: 59–65.
Scott DJ, Stohler CS, Egnatuk CM, Wang H, Koeppe RA, Zubieta J-K . Individual differences in reward responding explain placebo-induced expectations and effects. Neuron 2009; 55: 325–336.
Bingel U, Wanigasekera V, Wiech K, Ni Mhuircheartaigh R, Lee MC, Ploner M et al. The effect of treatment expectation on drug efficacy: imaging the analgesic benefit of the opioid remifentanil. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3: 70ra14.
Benedetti F, Pollo A, Lopiano L, Lanotte M, Vighetti S, Rainero I . Conscious expectation and unconscious conditioning in analgesic, motor, and hormonal placebo/nocebo responses. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 4315–4323.
Colloca L, Benedetti F . How prior experience shapes placebo analgesia. Pain 2006; 124: 126–133.
Vase L, Robinson ME, Verne GN, Price DD . The contributions of suggestion, desire, and expectation to placebo effects in irritable bowel syndrome patients: an empirical investigation. Pain 2003; 105: 17–25.
Gracely R, Dubner R, Deeter W, Wolskee P . Clinicians’ expectations influence placebo analgesia. Lancet 1985; 1: 43.
Levine JD, Gordon NC . Influence of the method of drug administration on analgesic response. Nature 1984; 312: 755–756.
Nummenmaa L, Glerean E, Viinikainen M, Jaaskelainen IP, Hari R, Sams M . Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci Usa 2012; 109: 9599–9604.
Stephens G, Silbert L, Hasson U . Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 9599–9604.
Ochsner KN, Zaki J, Hanelin J, Ludlow DH, Knierim K, Ramachandran T et al. Your pain or mine? Common and distinct neural systems supporting the perception of pain in self and other. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2008; 3: 144–160.
Singer T, Seymour B, O’Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD . Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 2004; 303: 1157–1162.
Lieberman MD, Jarcho JM, Berman S, Naliboff BD, Suyenobu BY, Mandelkern M et al. The neural correlates of placebo effects: a disruption account. NeuroImage 2004; 22: 447–455.
Schweinhardt P, Seminowicz DA, Jaeger E, Duncan GH, Bushnell MC . The anatomy of the mesolimbic reward system: a link between personality and the placebo analgesic response. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 4882–4887.
Davis MH . A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog Selected Documents Psychol 1980; 10: 85.
Davis MH . Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983; 44: 113–126.
Wager TD, Scott DJ, Zubieta JK . Placebo effects on human mu-opioid activity during pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci Usa 2007; 104: 11056–11061.
Lamm C, Batson CD, Decety J . The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. J Cogn Neurosci 2007; 19: 42–58.
Schaefer M, Heinze H-J, Rotte M . Embodied empathy for tactile events: interindividual differences and vicarious somatosensory responses during touch observation. NeuroImage 2012; 60: 952–957.
Falk EB, Spunt RP, Lieberman MD . Ascribing beliefs to ingroup and outgroup political candidates: neural correlates of perspective-taking, issue importance and days until the election. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2012; 367: 731–743.
Decety J, Yang C-Y, Cheng Y . Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: an event-related brain potential study. NeuroImage 2011; 50: 1676–1682.
Cheng Y, Lin CP, Liu HL, Hsu YY, Lim KE, Hung D et al. Expertise modulates the perception of pain in others. Curr Biol 2007; 17: 1708–1713.
Kable JW, Glimcher PW . The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci 2007; 10: 1625–1633.
Petrovic P, Pleger B, Seymour B, Kloppel S, De Martino B, Critchley H et al. Blocking central opiate function modulates hedonic impact and anterior cingulate response to rewards and losses. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 10509–10516.
Baumgartner T, Knoch D, Hotz P, Eisenegger C, Fehr E . Dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice. Nat Neurosci 2011; 14: 1468–1474.
Buckholtz JW, Asplund CL, Dux PE, Zald DH, Gore JC, Jones OD et al. The neural correlates of third-party punishment. Neuron 2008; 60: 930–940.
Rankin KP . The Human Frontal Lobes: Functions and Disorders vol. 2. The Guilford Press: New York, 2007.
Posner MI . Attention: the mechanisms of conciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 2: 7390–7403.
Frith CD . The social brain? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2007; 362: 671–678.
Young L, Dodell-Feder D, Saxe R . What gets the attention of the temporo-parietal junction? An fMRI investigation of attention and theory of mind. Neuropsychologia 2010; 48: 2658–2664.
Saxe R, Xiao DK, Kovacs G, Perrett DI, Kanwisher N . A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions. Neuropsychologia 2004; 42: 1435–1446.
Craig AD . Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body. Ann NY Acad Sci 2011; 1225: 72–82.
Schultz W . Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward. Annu Rev Psychol 2006; 57: 87–115.
Decety J, Porges EC . Imagining being the agent of actions that carry different moral consequences: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2011; 49: 2994–3001.
Scott DJ, Stohler CS, Egnatuk CM, Wang H, Koeppe RA, Zubieta JK . Placebo and nocebo effects are defined by opposite opioid and dopaminergic responses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65: 220–231.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Jonathan Berrebi and Dr Chantal Berna who provided technical and clinical expertise for this study. We also thank Professor Martin Ingvar for the valuable theoretical contributions to the study design and Magnus Gyllenswärd for help with graphic illustrations. The work was supported by the Swedish Society for Medical Research (SSMF, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine) and the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research to K. Jensen, Swedish Research Council to P Petrovic, K24 AT004095 (NCCAM) and R01 AT004662 (NCCAM) to T Kaptchuk, P01 AT006663 (NCCAM) to Bruce Rosen, KO1AT003883 (NCCAM), R21AT004497 (NCCAM), R03AT218317 (NIDA), R01AT006364 (NCCAM) to J Kong, R01AT005280 (NCCAM) to R Gollub, M01-RR-01066 and UL1 RR025758-01 for Clinical Research Center Biomedical Imaging Core from National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), and P41RR14075 for Center for Functional Neuroimaging Technologies from NCRR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jensen, K., Petrovic, P., Kerr, C. et al. Sharing pain and relief: neural correlates of physicians during treatment of patients. Mol Psychiatry 19, 392–398 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2012.195
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2012.195
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Reward and empathy in the treating clinician: the neural correlates of successful doctor–patient interactions
Translational Psychiatry (2020)
-
Assessing the effects of an empathy education program using psychometric instruments and brain fMRI
Advances in Health Sciences Education (2020)
-
Socially transmitted placebo effects
Nature Human Behaviour (2019)
-
Empathy for Distress in Humans and Rodents
Neuroscience Bulletin (2018)