Abstract
Cigarette consumption and smoking cessation are influenced in part by genes. Personality traits have also been implicated in the aetiology of smoking. Neuroticism, a personality trait with a heritable component, correlates well with anxiety and depression, increasing the risk of being a smoker and decreasing the chance of smoking cessation. Several prior studies in non-British populations have given conflicting results as to whether some genetic polymorphisms affect the relationship between smoking and neuroticism. This study investigated the influence of serotonin transporter (5HTTLPR) genotypes on a composite measure of neuroticism and cigarette consumption/smoking cessation in a British population. Although neuroticism was significantly associated with cigarette consumption and smoking cessation, genotype did not affect this relationship. Our results do not support initial interest in utilising 5HTTLPR genotypes in combination with neuroticism ratings for predicting outcome in smoking cessation clinical settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cigarette consumption and smoking cessation are influenced in part by genes (Carmelli et al. 1992; Heath et al. 1995). Personality traits have also been implicated in the aetiology of smoking (Patton et al. 1997).
Neuroticism, a personality trait with a heritable component (Eaves et al. 1999; Lake et al. 2000), correlates well with anxiety, depression, impulsivity and vulnerability (Eysenck and Eysenck 1975), increasing the risk of being a smoker and decreasing the chance of smoking cessation (Breslau et al. 1993b; McCrae et al. 1978). Depressive disorder, which is a clinical correlate of high neuroticism (Hirschfeld and Klerman 1979), has been associated with cigarette consumption and smoking cessation failure in several cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (Anda et al. 1990; Borrelli et al. 1996; Breslau et al. 1991, 1993a, 1998; Breslau 1995; Covey et al. 1990; Glassman et al. 1990). Initial attempts to discover the basis of this association focused on theories that smoking cessation leads to depression (Covey et al. 1990, 1997) or that depressed individuals smoked to improve mood (Breslau et al. 1993a). Kendler and et al. (1993b) brought some clarification in a study of 1,566 female twins, demonstrating that the association is most likely accounted for by common familial factors, probably genetic, that predisposed individuals to both traits.
The serotonin transporter gene (SERT), located on chromosome 17q11 + 2 (Heils et al. 1996; Lesch et al. 1994), has received attention as a candidate in influencing the relationship between smoking and neuroticism. Serotonin influences mood, and the serotonin transporter is the principal site of action of some antidepressants, particularly the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (Schloss and Williams 1998). Smoking initially activates nicotinic receptors, which then release serotonin from neurons (Li et al. 1998). Additionally, dopamine, a key neurotransmitter thought to be central to reward-driven addictive behaviours is influenced by serotonergic processes (Picciotto and Corrigall 2002). Both these processes are thought to mediate reward and lead to reinforcement of the addictive behaviour. A 44-base pair insertion-deletion polymorphism in the promoter region (5HTTLPR) was shown to alter transcription levels of SERT (Heils et al. 1996). The role of the mature protein is to clear serotonin from the synaptic cleft and recycle it back into the presynaptic neuron, regulating available serotonin in the brain. The deletion or short allele is responsible for reduced transcription compared to the insertion or long allele. These findings suggest that this polymorphism influences functional aspects of the mature serotonin transporter.
Previous studies have supported SERT’s role in neuroticism (Greenberg et al. 2000; Katsuragi et al. 1999; Lesch et al. 1996; Murakami et al. 1999; Ricketts et al. 1998), although not all have done so (Ebstein et al. 1997; Jorm et al. 1998; Middeldorp et al. 2007; Willis-Owen et al. 2005). A recent meta-analysis by Munafo et al. (2004) found that possession of at least one copy of the short allele was associated with an increased risk of being a current smoker, suggesting that the short allele of SERT may be associated with reduced risk of successful smoking cessation. To our knowledge, no study to date has investigated the relationship between SERT variation and level of cigarette consumption.
The possibility of a joint influence of variation in SERT and neuroticism in influencing smoking behaviour was initially examined by Hu et al. (2000) and, on an independent sample, by Lerman et al. (2000). Hu et al. (2000) concluded that neuroticism was positively correlated with current smoking and negatively associated with smoking cessation in individuals and siblings with short 5HTTLPR genotypes, but not in those with long 5HTTLPR genotypes. Individuals with both a short 5HTTLPR genotype and a high level of neuroticism had the greatest difficulty in quitting smoking. Later, Brody et al. (2005) examined the influence of SERT in moderating the relationship between smoking and neuroticism, in particular attempting to replicate the findings of Hu et al. (2000) and Lerman et al. (2000). Measures of neuroticism in this study were depression proneness inventory (Alloy et al. 1987), a ten-item self-report questionnaire, and the inventory to diagnose depression-lifetime (Zimmerman and Coryell 1987). No joint influence of the short 5HTTLPR genotype and neuroticism was found in this study. Furthermore, a recent study by Kremer and colleagues (Kremer et al. 2005) found that the long 5HTTLPR allele was associated with smoking and that novelty seeking mediated the effect of SERT on smoking in those with the long 5HTTLPR allele. Four studies to date have focused on the influence of SERT variants on the relationship between neuroticism and smoking and the key features of these are outlined in Table 1.
It has been suggested that neuroticism and personality scores in combination with the 5HTTLPR genotype might in future predict the clinical efficacy of certain smoking cessation drugs (Hu et al. 2000), thereby reducing side-effects and costs associated with poorly matched treatments. Several prior studies in non-British populations (outlined in Table 1) have given conflicting results as to whether different genetic variations affect the relationship between smoking and neuroticism. This study investigated the influence of serotonin transporter (5HTTLPR) genotypes on a composite measure of neuroticism and cigarette consumption/smoking cessation in a British population.
Aims
Our study aimed to investigate the potential of using personality traits and serotonin genotype as a combined therapeutic screening tool, ultimately within clinical smoking cessation services. To do this, we investigated two hypotheses. First, that there would be an association between 5HTTLPR genotype and cigarette consumption and/or smoking cessation. Second, that the 5HTTLPR genotype would affect the relationship between a novel composite index of neuroticism (G) and cigarette consumption and/or smoking cessation and G (Sham et al. 2000).
Materials and methods
Individuals were recruited as part of a larger project, the GENESiS study (Sham et al. 2000), which examined quantitative trait loci that contribute towards anxiety and depressive disorders. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and a total of 35,223 adult responses were collected for the GENESiS study. Included in the questionnaire completed by all participants was a self-report measure of smoking behaviour, completed by 99% of the respondents (34,946).
Smoking questionnaire
Are you a smoker? (please mark the box relevant to you)
-
No
-
Ex-regular
-
Social smoker
-
Light smoker (10 or less a day)
-
Moderate smoker (11–20 a day)
-
Heavy smoker (more than 20 a day)
The genotyping sample for this study consisted of 1,158 unrelated individuals selected from the 0 to 10th percentile and the 90–100th percentile in the original GENESiS study. All study participants completed a structured questionnaire stratifying them into those reporting non-smoker status (n = 770), “ex-regular smoker”(n = 90), “social smoker” (n = 35), “light smoker” (10 or less cigarettes per day, n = 57), “moderate smoker” (11–20 cigarettes a day, n = 120), “heavy smoker” (more than 20 cigarettes a day, n = 42). For the purposes of smoking cessation studies, a “current smoker” group was formed comprising of the light, moderate and heavy smoker groups (n = 219) and compared with the “ex-regular smoker” group (n = 90). For the purposes of cigarette consumption studies, those in the current smoker group were stratified into two groups depending on the number of cigarettes smoked, coded as <10/day, “light group” (n = 92, comprising of “social” and “light” groups), > 10 cigs/day, “heavy group” (n = 162 comprising of “moderate” and “heavy” groups), based on a previous study which used a used a similar division (McKinney et al. 2000).
We used a neuroticism measure referred to as G in the Genesis project. G is comprised of a composite score of measurements collected from several well-validated and standardised instruments for the measurement of anxiety and depression related traits, other personality traits, and psychosocial adversity: The General Health Questionnaire (12-item version; GHQ12) was used as a test of general mental health symptoms (Goldberg et al. 1997). The short form of the neuroticism scale from the revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ-N) was used as a measure of trait anxiety (Eysenck et al. 1985). Short forms of two subscales were used from the Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire to measure levels of anxious arousal (MASQ-AA), and high positive affect (Watson et al. 1995) (MASQ-HPA) (a detailed description is provided in the original GENESiS study; Sham et al. 2000). G was developed to represent a score that reflected the ‘shared genetic liability’ to depression and anxiety because there is evidence to suggest that, at a genetic and clinical level, depression and anxiety are closely related (Kendler et al. 1987, 1992; Roy et al. 1995). The maximum possible heritability estimate of the composite index in this sample was estimated at 42%, a result comparable to estimates given for neuroticism and depression (Kendler et al. 1993a; Sullivan et al. 2000).
Recessive, co-dominant and dominant models of interaction between genotype and neuroticism (Genotype × G) were applied. In the recessive model, individuals having two copies of the hypothesised risk allele (short allele, 5HTTLPR) and who were members of the high G group were coded as 1. Individuals possessing other genotypes and all those in the low G group were coded as 0. In the co-dominant model, those in the high G group possessing one short allele were coded as 1 and those in the high G group with 2 short alleles were coded as 2. All others were coded as 0. In the dominant model, those in the high G group possessing one or two short alleles were coded as 1. All others were coded as 0.The individuals selected for this study were sent cotton buds to collect buccal cells with instructions on how to perform the collection. On receipt of the returned samples, DNA was extracted according to a well-validated technique (Freeman et al. 2003). Primer sequences for the 5HTTLPR genotyping have been previously described (Gelernter et al. 1997). Electrophoresis was performed on an ABI3100 (PE Biosystems) using standard manufacturer guidelines and the resulting genotypes were analysed with GENEMAPPER™ version 3.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package STATA version 8. In order to test the association of 5HTTLPR genotype and both smoking cessation and cigarette consumption, a chi-square test was performed. Mean G scores with corresponding confidence intervals were also calculated according to smoking cessation and the rate of cigarette consumption. The STATA 8 package also enabled a series of logistic regressions equations to be run with smoking cessation and cigarette consumption as dependent variables (each examined as separate variables), and with independent variables of 5-HTTLPR, G and the interaction term 5HTTLPR*G. The package facilitated the reporting of odds ratios, corresponding 95% confidence intervals and p-values.
Power calculations
We performed power calculations for smoking cessation and cigarette consumption to estimate the relevance of p-values produced from this dataset. The genetic power calculator (http://statgen.iop.kcl.ac.uk/gpc/cc2.html) was utilised, in particular methodology for discrete traits in case control studies. Prevalences were assumed to be 0.29 (90/219) for smoking cessation and 0.64 (162/254) for “heavy group” smoker status (cigarette consumption). A heterozygous odds ratio of 3 and a homozygous risk of 5 assuming a risk allele frequency of 0.43 (from Lerman et al. 2000) was defined as the level of clinical relevance for major-effect genes.
Results
In total, we collected 1,158 DNA samples from unrelated individuals selected from the 0 to 10th (n = 563, ‘controls’) and 90–100th (n = 595, ‘cases’), percentiles of a distribution of G. The female-to-male ratio is 1.7 to 1, with 378 female and 217 male cases and 353 female and 210 male controls. G ranged from 1.4 to 3.0 standard deviations from the mean in the cases and from −1.2 to −2.9 standard deviations from the mean in the controls. The median age of the sample is 45, ranging from 20 to 67. The mean G score is 0.06. The possibility of population stratification by latent class analysis using the program L-POP (Purcell 2003) in over 400 microsatellites in approximately 724 individuals has been previously assessed in this sample (Nash 2005). No evidence of stratification was found in this population. The power calculations demonstrated that the sample size needed to ascertain the significance of association of 5HTTLPR and the smoking behaviours with an alpha value of 0.05 and 80% power was 52 for smoking cessation and 15 for cigarette consumption. This power calculation confirmed that our sample size was large enough to detect association with an acceptable level of confidence.
Self-reported smoking behaviours, G scores and serotonin transporter genotypes were determined. The serotonin transporter genotype distributions were consistent with those found in previous studies of the serotonin transporter (Brody et al. 2005; Hu et al. 2000) and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was confirmed (Table 2).
Potential association of genotype on cigarette consumption and/or smoking cessation
We found no association between 5HTTLPR S genotypes and cigarette consumption (Table 3).
There was also no main effect of genotype on smoking cessation (current smokers vs ex-regular smokers) (Table 4)
Effects of G (a novel measure of neuroticism) on cigarette consumption and/or smoking cessation
The mean G score was less in the <10 cigarettes/day than the >10 cigarettes/day groups (Table 5).
We then performed a series of logistic regression equations with the dependent variable of cigarette consumption (2 groups, <10 cigarettes/day (light)/> 10 cigarettes a day (heavy). A positive association was found between G and the rate of cigarette consumption (OR = 1.37, CI = 1.174–1.621, p < 0.001). However, there was no observed association between the rate of cigarette consumption and the interaction term 5HTTLPR*G for the recessive, dominant (not presented) and co-dominant (presented in Table 6).
In terms of the relationship between G and cessation, there was no main effect of 5HTTLPR genotype on smoking cessation (CI = 0.72–1.41, p = 0.98). Mean G scores were significantly higher in those who were continuing to smoke compared to those who had ceased smoking (Table 7). We examined the effect of genotype and G on the tendency to cease smoking once becoming a regular smoker in a logistic regression model. G had a main negative effect on smoking cessation (OR = 1.40, CI 1.28–1.53, p < 0.001). A recessive and dominant model investigating the interaction term of neuroticism and genotype revealed no evidence of an interaction between the 5HTTLPR × neuroticism interaction term and smoking cessation (Table 8).
Discussion
In our British Caucasian sample, we found that our results concur with those of previous studies for the basic relationship between neuroticism and smoking. As our neuroticism (G) scores increased, participants were more likely to consume more cigarettes and less likely to have ceased smoking. However, we found no association of 5HTTLPR genotypes with either cigarette consumption or smoking cessation. Crucially, there were no interactive effects of 5HTTLPR genotypes and G scores influencing cigarette consumption or smoking cessation. These results fail to replicate the positive finding from Hu et al. (2000) and Lerman et al. (2000). Our findings are in accordance with those of Brody et al. (2005) where the authors found no association between 5HTTLPR genotype, neuroticism and smoking cigarette consumption/smoking cessation. In a related randomised nicotine replacement trial, Munafo et al. (2006) also failed to find an association between 5HTTLPR genotype and smoking cessation.
Our measure of neuroticism is novel, and provided a new opportunity to test important associations between 5HTTLPR genotypes, neuroticism and smoking where previously there has been little consensus. The current study population is British Cauacasian; studies to date have been based in either the US (Hu et al. 2000; Lerman et al. 2000) or Israel (Kremer et al. 2005). Kremer et al. (2005) highlighted how genetic population differences and differences in personality factors might explain opposing results regarding which 5HTTLPR allele is associated with smoking behaviours. Hu et al. (2000) found a negative association between short 5HTTLPR genotype and smoking cessation, supporting the hypothesis that the S genotypes conferred increased risk for smoking cessation and, furthermore, there was a positive interaction with neuroticism in those individuals possessing the S genotypes. However, the Israeli study (Kremer et al. 2005) found the opposite association of the l allele with smoking status and neuroticism. The results of the Israeli group are consistent with those of two previous studies on smoking behaviour by Japanese groups, implicating the l allele in smoking behaviours.
The heterogeneity of neuroticism measures between studies may account for a lack of concensus between results. Kremer et al. (2005) drew attention to the fact that, in North American studies where individuals scored high on neuroticism measures, the 5HTTLPR short allele tended to be associated with smoking behaviours. They noted that in the only other non-US study (in Israel), the 5HTTLPR long allele was associated with smoking variables in individuals scoring high on extraversion or sensation seeking.
Our sample used G as a measure of neuroticism, a novel composite score comprising of four questionnaires. We also selected individuals from the extremes of G from an overall sample of over 35,000 individuals. This is the first study of its kind to use the combination of questionnaires (EPQ-N, GHQ-12, MASQ-AA and MASQ-HPA) to derive a gross neuroticism/anxiety score (G) and to investigate the relationship of this score to smoking phenotypes. Kremer and colleagues have argued as to why the level of dependence in different samples is unlikely to be an important confounder in population-based smoking studies. They cite the considerable variation in levels of nicotine dependence across studies without any observed connection with genotype as adequate evidence (Arinami et al. 1999; Hu et al. 2000; Ishikawa et al. 1999; Lerman et al. 1998, 2000).
We failed to find an association between cigarette consumption and the serotonin transporter gene, and found no evidence of the serotonin transporter gene influencing the relationship between smoking cessation/cigarette consumption and neuroticism as measured by G. We therefore conclude that the interaction of the 5HTTLPR genotype and neuroticism (as measured by G) does not influence cigarette consumption or smoking cessation in unrelated individuals selected from a large community sample. We also found no evidence of an association between serotonin transporter variants and cigarette consumption/smoking cessation. Consequently, our study does not support initial interest in utilising serotonin transporter genotypes in combination with neuroticism ratings for predicting outcome in the smoking cessation clinical settings.
References
Alloy LB, Hartlage S, Metalsky GI, Abramson LY (1987) The Depression Proneness inventory: A brief, face valid scale of vulnerability to depressive reactions in response to stress. Unpublished manuscript, Temple University, Philadelphia
Anda RF, Williamson DF, Escobedo LG, Mast EE, Giovino GA, Remington PL (1990) Depression and the dynamics of smoking. A national perspective. JAMA 264:1541–1545
Arinami T, Ohtsuki T, Yamakawa-Kobayashi K, Amemiya H, Fujiwara H, Kawata K, Ishiguro H, Hamaguchi H (1999) A synergistic effect of serotonin transporter gene polymorphism and smoking in association with CHD. Thromb Haemost 81:853–856
Borrelli B, Niaura R, Keuthen NJ, Goldstein MG, DePue JD, Murphy C, Abrams DB (1996) Development of major depressive disorder during smoking-cessation treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 57:534–538
Breslau N (1995) Psychiatric comorbidity of smoking and nicotine dependence. Behav Genet 25:95–101
Breslau N, Kilbey M, Andreski P (1991) Nicotine dependence, major depression, and anxiety in young adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry 48:1069–1074
Breslau N, Kilbey MM, Andreski P (1993a) Nicotine dependence and major depression. New evidence from a prospective investigation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 50:31–35
Breslau N, Kilbey MM, Andreski P (1993b) Vulnerability to psychopathology in nicotine-dependent smokers: an epidemiologic study of young adults. Am J Psychiatry 150:941–946
Breslau N, Peterson EL, Schultz LR, Chilcoat HD, Andreski P (1998) Major depression and stages of smoking. A longitudinal investigation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55:161–166
Brody CL, Hamer DH, Haaga DA (2005) Depression vulnerability, cigarette smoking, and the serotonin transporter gene. Addict Behav 30:557–566
Carmelli D, Swan GE, Robinette D, Fabsitz R (1992) Genetic influence on smoking–a study of male twins. N Engl J Med 327:829–833
Covey LS, Glassman AH, Stetner F (1990) Depression and depressive symptoms in smoking cessation. Compr Psychiatry 31:350–354
Covey LS, Glassman AH, Stetner F (1997) Major depression following smoking cessation. Am J Psychiatry 154:263–265
Eaves L, Heath A, Martin N, Maes H, Neale M, Kendler K, Kirk K, Corey L (1999) Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the Virginia 30,000 study of twins and their relatives. Twin Res 2:62–80
Ebstein RP, Gritsenko I, Nemanov L, Frisch A, Osher Y, Belmaker RH (1997) No association between the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region polymorphism and the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) temperament of harm avoidance. Mol Psychiatry 2:224–226
Eysenck H, Eysenck S (1975) Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. Hodder and Stoughton, London
Eysenck SBG, Eysenck HJ, Barrett P (1985) A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Pers Individ Dif 6:21–29
Freeman B, Smith N, Curtis C, Huckett L, Mill J, Craig IW (2003) DNA from buccal swabs recruited by mail: evaluation of storage effects on long-term stability and suitability for multiplex polymerase chain reaction genotyping. Behav Genet 33:67–72
Gelernter J, Kranzler H, Cubells JF (1997) Serotonin transporter protein (SLC6A4) allele and haplotype frequencies and linkage disequilibria in African- and European-American and Japanese populations and in alcohol-dependent subjects. Hum Genet 101:243–246
Glassman AH, Helzer JE, Covey LS, Cottler LB, Stetner F, Tipp JE, Johnson J (1990) Smoking, smoking cessation, and major depression. JAMA 264:1546–1549
Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, Rutter C (1997) The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med 27:191–197
Greenberg BD, Li Q, Lucas FR, Hu S, Sirota LA, Benjamin J, Lesch KP, Hamer D, Murphy DL (2000) Association between the serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism and personality traits in a primarily female population sample. Am J Med Genet 96:202–216
Heath AC, Madden PA, Slutske WS, Martin NG (1995) Personality and the inheritance of smoking behavior: a genetic perspective. Behav Genet 25:103–117
Heils A, Teufel A, Petri S, Stober G, Riederer P, Bengel D, Lesch KP (1996) Allelic variation of human serotonin transporter gene expression. J Neurochem 66:2621–2624
Hirschfeld RM, Klerman GL (1979) Personality attributes and affective disorders. Am J Psychiatry 136:67–70
Hu S, Brody CL, Fisher C, Gunzerath L, Nelson ML, Sabol SZ, Sirota LA, Marcus SE, Greenberg BD, Murphy DL, Hamer DH (2000) Interaction between the serotonin transporter gene and neuroticism in cigarette smoking behavior. Mol Psychiatry 5:181–188
Ishikawa H, Ohtsuki T, Ishiguro H, Yamakawa-Kobayashi K, Endo K, Lin YL, Yanagi H, Tsuchiya S, Kawata K, Hamaguchi H, Arinami T (1999) Association between serotonin transporter gene polymorphism and smoking among Japanese males. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:831–833
Jorm AF, Henderson AS, Jacomb PA, Christensen H, Korten AE, Rodgers B, Tan X, Easteal S (1998) An association study of a functional polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene with personality and psychiatric symptoms. Mol Psychiatry 3:449–451
Katsuragi S, Kunugi H, Sano A, Tsutsumi T, Isogawa K, Nanko S, Akiyoshi J (1999) Association between serotonin transporter gene polymorphism and anxiety-related traits. Biol Psychiatry 45:368–370
Kendler KS, Heath AC, Martin NG, Eaves LJ (1987) Symptoms of anxiety and symptoms of depression. Same genes, different environments? Arch Gen Psychiatry 44:451–457
Kendler KS, Neale MC, Kessler RC, Heath AC, Eaves LJ (1992) Major depression and generalized anxiety disorder. Same genes, (partly) different environments? Arch Gen Psychiatry 49:716–722
Kendler KS, Neale MC, Kessler RC, Heath AC, Eaves LJ (1993a) A longitudinal twin study of personality and major depression in women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 50:853–862
Kendler KS, Neale MC, MacLean CJ, Heath AC, Eaves LJ, Kessler RC (1993b) Smoking and major depression. A causal analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 50:36–43
Kremer I, Bachner-Melman R, Reshef A, Broude L, Nemanov L, Gritsenko I, Heresco-Levy U, Elizur Y, Ebstein RP (2005) Association of the serotonin transporter gene with smoking behavior. Am J Psychiatry 162:924–930
Lake RI, Eaves LJ, Maes HH, Heath AC, Martin NG (2000) Further evidence against the environmental transmission of individual differences in neuroticism from a collaborative study of 45,850 twins and relatives on two continents. Behav Genet 30:223–233
Lerman C, Caporaso NE, Audrain J, Main D, Boyd NR, Shields PG (2000) Interacting effects of the serotonin transporter gene and neuroticism in smoking practices and nicotine dependence. Mol Psychiatry 5:189–192
Lerman C, Shields PG, Audrain J, Main D, Cobb B, Boyd NR, Caporaso N (1998) The role of the serotonin transporter gene in cigarette smoking. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7:253–255
Lesch KP, Balling U, Gross J, Strauss K, Wolozin BL, Murphy DL, Riederer P (1994) Organization of the human serotonin transporter gene. J Neural Transm Gen Sect 95:157–162
Lesch KP, Bengel D, Heils A, Sabol SZ, Greenberg BD, Petri S, Benjamin J, Muller CR, Hamer DH, Murphy DL (1996) Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science 274:1527–1531
Li X, Rainnie DG, McCarley RW, Greene RW (1998) Presynaptic nicotinic receptors facilitate monoaminergic transmission. J Neurosci 18:1904–1912
McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr., Bosse R (1978) Anxiety, extraversion and smoking. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 17:269–273
McKinney EF, Walton RT, Yudkin P, Fuller A, Haldar NA, Mant D, Murphy M, Welsh KI, Marshall SE (2000) Association between polymorphisms in dopamine metabolic enzymes and tobacco consumption in smokers. Pharmacogenetics 10:483–491
Middeldorp CM, de Geus EJ, Beem AL, Lakenberg N, Hottenga JJ, Slagboom PE, Boomsma DI (2007) Family based association analyses between the serotonin transporter gene polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and neuroticism, anxiety and depression. Behav Genet 37:294–301
Munafo M, Clark T, Johnstone E, Murphy M, Walton R (2004) The genetic basis for smoking behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob Res 6:583–597
Munafo MR, Johnstone EC, Wileyto EP, Shields PG, Elliot KM, Lerman C (2006) Lack of association of 5-HTTLPR genotype with smoking cessation in a nicotine replacement therapy randomized trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:398–400
Murakami F, Shimomura T, Kotani K, Ikawa S, Nanba E, Adachi K (1999) Anxiety traits associated with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region in the Japanese. J Hum Genet 44:15–17
Nash M (2005) Elucidation of quantitative trait loci for depression and anxiety. King’s College London, pp 139–166
Patton D, Barnes GE, Murray RP (1997) A personality typology of smokers. Addict Behav 22:269–273
Picciotto MR, Corrigall WA (2002) Neuronal systems underlying behaviors related to nicotine addiction: neural circuits and molecular genetics. J Neurosci 22:3338–3341
Purcell S (2003) Sample selection and complex effects in quantitative trait loci analysis. Dissertation, University of London
Ricketts MH, Hamer RM, Sage JI, Manowitz P, Feng F, Menza MA (1998) Association of a serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism with harm avoidance behaviour in an elderly population. Psychiatr Genet 8:41–44
Roy MA, Neale MC, Pedersen NL, Mathe AA, Kendler KS (1995) A twin study of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression. Psychol Med 25:1037–1049
Schloss P, Williams DC (1998) The serotonin transporter: a primary target for antidepressant drugs. J Psychopharmacol 12:115–121
Sham PC, Sterne A, Purcell S, Cherny S, Webster M, Rijsdijk F, Asherson P, Ball D, Craig I, Eley T, Goldberg D, Gray J, Mann A, Owen M, Plomin R (2000) GENESiS: creating a composite index of the vulnerability to anxiety and depression in a community-based sample of siblings. Twin Res 3:316–322
Sullivan PF, Neale MC, Kendler KS (2000) Genetic epidemiology of major depression: review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 157:1552–1562
Watson D, Weber K, Assenheimer JS, Clark LA, Strauss ME, McCormick RA (1995) Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales. J Abnorm Psychol 104:3–14
Willis-Owen SA, Turri MG, Munafo MR, Surtees PG, Wainwright NW, Brixey RD, Flint J (2005) The serotonin transporter length polymorphism, neuroticism, and depression: a comprehensive assessment of association. Biol Psychiatry 58:451–456
Zimmerman M, Coryell W (1987) The inventory to diagnose depression, lifetime version. Acta Psychiatr Scand 75:495–499
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Gara, C., Knight, J., Stapleton, J. et al. Association of the serotonin transporter gene, neuroticism and smoking behaviours. J Hum Genet 53, 239–246 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10038-007-0243-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10038-007-0243-1
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Common and Unique Biological Pathways Associated with Smoking Initiation/Progression, Nicotine Dependence, and Smoking Cessation
Neuropsychopharmacology (2010)
-
Lack of association between serotonin transporter gene polymorphism 5-HTTLPR and smoking among Polish population: a case-control study
BMC Medical Genetics (2008)