Abstract
The social cost of carbon (SCC) is a key tool in climate policy. The SCC expresses in monetary terms the social impact of the emission of a ton of CO2 in a given year. The SCC is calculated using a ‘social welfare function’ (SWF): a method for assessing social welfare. The dominant SWF in climate policy is the discounted-utilitarian SWF. Individuals’ well-being numbers (utilities) are summed, and the values for later generations are reduced (‘discounted’). This SWF has been criticized for ignoring the distribution of well-being and including an arbitrary time preference. Here, we use a ‘prioritarian’ SWF, with no time discount, to calculate the SCC. This SWF gives extra weight (‘priority’) to worse-off individuals. Prioritarianism is a well-developed concept in ethics and welfare economics, but has been rarely used in climate scholarship. We find substantial differences between the discounted-utilitarian and non-discounted prioritarian SCCs.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nordhaus, W. D. A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies (Yale Univ. Press, 2008).
Dietz, S. & Asheim, G. B. Climate policy under sustainable discounted utilitarianism. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 63, 321–335 (2012).
Botzen, W. J. W. & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. Specifications of social welfare in economic studies of climate policy: overview of criteria and related policy insights. Environ. Resour. Econ. 58, 1–33 (2014).
Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Kaplow, L. The Theory of Taxation and Public Economics (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).
Boadway, R. W. & Bruce, N. Welfare Economics (B. Blackwell, 1984).
Adler, M. D. Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).
Weymark, J. A. in The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy (eds Adler, M. D. & Fleurbaey, M.) 126–159 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016).
Broome, J. The ethics of climate change. Sci. Am. 298, 96–102 (2008).
Mirrlees, J. A. & Stern, N. H. Fairly good plans. J. Econ. Theory 4, 268–288 (1972).
Pigou, A. C. The Economics of Welfare (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).
Harrod, R. F. Towards a Dynamic Economics (Macmillan, 1948).
Solow, R. M. Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Rev. Econ. Stud. 41, 29–45 (1974).
Anand, S. & Sen, A. Human development and economic sustainability. World Dev. 28, 2029–2049 (2000).
Arrow, K. J. et al. Should governments use a declining discount rate in project analysis? Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 8, 145–163 (2014).
Dasgupta, P. Discounting climate change. J. Risk Uncertain. 37, 141–169 (2008).
Ramsey, F. P. A mathematical theory of saving. Econ. J. 38, 543–559 (1928).
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice (Harvard Univ. Press, 1999).
Adler, M. D. & Treich, N. Prioritarianism and climate change. Environ. Resour. Econ. 62, 279–308 (2015).
Parfit, D. Another defence of the priority view. Utilitas 24, 399–440 (2012).
Holtug, N. Persons, Interests, and Justice (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).
Holtug, N. in The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory (eds Hirose, I. & Olson, J.) 267–284 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).
Tungodden, B. The value of equality. Econ. Philos. 19, 1–44 (2003).
Porter, T. In defence of the priority view. Utilitas 24, 349–364 (2012).
Williams, A. The priority view bites the dust? Utilitas 24, 315–331 (2012).
Brown, C. Priority or sufficiency... or both? Econ. Philos. 21, 199–220 (2005).
Parfit, D. in The Ideal of Equality (eds Clayton, M. & Williams, A.) 81–125 (Palgrave, 2000).
Bossert, W. & Weymark, J. A. in Handbook of Utility Theory (eds Barberà, S., Hammond, P. J. & Seidl, C.) 1099–1177 (Springer, 2004).
Blackorby, C., Bossert, W. & Donaldson, D. J. Population Issues in Social Choice Theory, Welfare Economics, and Ethics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).
Kolstad, C. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 207–282 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Pizer, W. et al. Using and improving the social cost of carbon. Science 346, 1189–1190 (2014).
Greenstone, M., Kopits, E. & Wolverton, A. Developing a social cost of carbon for US regulatory analysis: a methodology and interpretation. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 7, 23–46 (2013).
Tol, R. S. The social cost of carbon. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 3, 419–443 (2011).
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. & Botzen, W. J. W. Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: a critical survey. Ecol. Econ. 114, 33–46 (2015).
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. & Botzen, W. J. W. A lower bound to the social cost of CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 253–258 (2014).
Nordhaus, W. D. Economic aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11721–11726 (2010).
Pindyck, R. S. Climate change policy: What do the models tell us? J. Econ. Lit. 51, 860–872 (2013).
Weitzman, M. L. A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. J. Econ. Lit. 45, 703–724 (2007).
Ferreira, F. H. G. et al. A global count of the extreme poor in 2012: data issues, methodology, and initial results. J. Econ. Inequal. 14, 141–172 (2016).
Anthoff, D., Hepburn, C. & Tol, R. S. Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change. Ecol. Econ. 68, 836–849 (2009).
Nordhaus, W. D. A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change. J. Econ. Lit. 45, 686–702 (2007).
Dennig, F., Budolfson, M. B., Fleurbaey, M., Siebert, A. & Socolow, R. H. Inequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15827–15832 (2015).
Stern, N. The economics of climate change. Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 1–37 (2008).
Drupp, M., Freeman, M., Groom, B. & Nesje, F. Discounting Disentangled Working Paper 172 (Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, 2015); http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Working-Paper-172-Drupp-et-al.pdf
Samuelson, P. A. Foundations of Economic Analysis (Harvard Univ. Press, 1983).
Nordhaus, W. D. Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change (MIT Press, 1994).
Gollier, C. The Economics of Risk and Time (MIT Press, 2004).
Adler, M. D. in The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy (eds Adler, M. D. & Fleurbaey, M.) 476–517 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016).
Broome, J. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty, and Time (Wiley-Blackwell, 1995).
Fleurbaey, M. in The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy (eds Adler, M. D. & Fleurbaey, M.) 453–475 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016).
Boadway, R. in The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy (eds Adler, M. D. & Fleurbaey, M.) 47–81 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2016).
Johansson-Stenman, O. On the value of life in rich and poor countries and distributional weights beyond utilitarianism. Environ. Resour. Econ. 17, 299–310 (2000).
Cowell, F. A. & Gardiner, K. Welfare weights Economic Research Paper 202 (Office of Fair Trading, 1999); http://darp.lse.ac.uk/papersDB/Cowell-Gardiner_(OFT).pdf
Brunnermeier, M. K. & Nagel, S. Do wealth fluctuations generate time-varying risk aversion? Micro-evidence on individuals. Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 713–736 (2008).
Chiappori, P.-A. & Paiella, M. Relative risk aversion is constant: evidence from panel data. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 9, 1021–1052 (2011).
Szpiro, G. G. Measuring risk aversion: an alternative approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 68, 156–159 (1986).
Epstein, L. G. & Zin, S. E. Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: an empirical analysis. J. Polit. Econ. 99, 263–286 (1991).
Attanasio, O. P., Banks, J. & Tanner, S. Asset holding and consumption volatility. J. Polit. Econ. 110, 771–792 (2002).
Chetty, R. A new method of estimating risk aversion. Am. Econ. Rev. 96, 1821–1834 (2006).
Quiggin, J. Stern and his critics on discounting and climate change: An editorial essay. Climatic Change 89, 195–205 (2008).
Kreps, D. M. Notes on the Theory of Choice (Westview Press, 1988).
Cockburn, J., Duclos, J.-Y. & Zabsonré, A. Is global social welfare increasing? A critical-level enquiry. J. Public Econ. 118, 151–162 (2014).
Millner, A. On welfare frameworks and catastrophic climate risks. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 65, 310–325 (2013).
Stanton, E. A. Negishi welfare weights in integrated assessment models: the mathematics of global inequality. Climatic Change 107, 417–432 (2011).
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation through the Network for Sustainable Climate Risk Management (SCRiM) under NSF cooperative agreement GEO-1240507 as well as the Penn State Center for Climate Risk Management. V.B. gratefully acknowledges funding from the European Research Council under the European Community’s program ‘Ideas’ (ERC-2013-StG/ERC grant agreement no. 336703, project RISICO, ‘Risk and uncertainty in developing and implementing climate change policies’). We thank F. Errickson and K. Ruckert for excellent research assistance and N. Tuana and R. Lempert for valuable inputs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to developing the analytic framework, interpreting results and drafting the text. D.A. wrote code to calculate SCC values in RICE, and G.G. prepared the figures.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 428 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adler, M., Anthoff, D., Bosetti, V. et al. Priority for the worse-off and the social cost of carbon. Nature Clim Change 7, 443–449 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3298
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3298
This article is cited by
-
Justice considerations in climate research
Nature Climate Change (2024)
-
Attention to values helps shape convergence research
Climatic Change (2022)
-
Evaluating the distributional fairness of alternative adaptation policies: a case study in Vietnam’s upper Mekong Delta
Climatic Change (2022)
-
Estimating a social cost of carbon for global energy consumption
Nature (2021)
-
Utilitarian benchmarks for emissions and pledges promote equity, climate and development
Nature Climate Change (2021)