Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
Researchers are often keen to learn from the people who their work could help, but knowledge gaps and power dynamics on both sides can make it seem like an insurmountable task.
In this collection, we look at ways patients, communities and researchers have found innovative ways to work together and break down barriers. People with lived experience of disease offer advice to improve co-production of knowledge with patient partners, we explore the growing influence of patient representatives and patient groups on research policy and learn how an international group of scientists are learning how to make their research equitable from local communities around the world.
Secondary use of patient health data can be a boon for medical research and development, but only if researchers can cultivate patient trust in the system.
Patients with rare diseases, and the scientists who study those diseases, were long inhibited by geographic sparsity. But the social-media age has made it much easier for them to band together to leverage their experience and push forward change.
In recent years, patient research groups have spurred culture shifts in biomedical research and governance, with many health experts lauding the benefit of these groups’ being embedded in the research process. Some, however, question private-sector influence in these groups’ newfound power.
Reuse of patient data for research purposes could be very fruitful. However, too seldom are those whom the data are from—the patients—involved in how their data should be used.
Patients’ contributions to biomedical research have quickly been shifting from passive participant to active contributor. But what happens when the person with lived experience of the disease becomes the clinical researcher?
Melanoma Patient Network Europe has a lot of experience in connecting researchers with patients, including organizing patient-led conferences. The group’s founder explains how productive interaction can be transformative to research.
The Human Cell Atlas has been undergoing a massive effort to support global scientific equity. The co-leaders of its Equity Working Group share some lessons learned in the process.
A genetic study of angiosarcoma designed through an online patient-partnership model overcomes key barriers in rare-disease research and provides indicators of clinical approaches.
A framework of patient-partnered research allows patients with angiosarcoma to share their samples and clinical records securely to accelerate molecular characterization of tumors and identification of therapeutic approaches.