Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Cancer biomarkers

HDAC6 score: to treat or not to treat?

Developing approaches to identify patients who may benefit from specific treatments is an important area of research. A study now defines an HDAC6 score to predict the response of patients with breast cancer to the HDAC6 inhibitor ricolinostat and characterizes its anti-tumor effects with preclinical mechanistic work and a phase 1b clinical trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: High HDAC6 score reveals sensitivity to HDCA6 inhibition.

References

  1. Bates, S. E. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 650–663 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Luu, T. H. et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 7138–7142 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Whittaker, S. J. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 4485–4491 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choudhary, C. et al. Science 325, 834–840 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaur, S., Rajoria, P. & Chopra, M. Cell. Oncol. (Dordr.) 45, 779–829 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawaguchi, Y. et al. Cell 115, 727–738 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Santo, L. et al. Blood 119, 2579–2589 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hontecillas-Prieto, L. et al. Front. Genet. 11, 578011 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeleke, T. Z. et al. Nat. Cancer https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-022-00489-5 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Putcha, P. et al. Breast Cancer Res. 17, 149 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kutil, Z. et al. FASEB J. 33, 4035–4045 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hai, Y. & Christianson, D. W. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 741–747 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Llombart, V. & Mansour, M. R. EBioMedicine 75, 103756 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Banik, D. et al. Cancer Res. 80, 3649–3662 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fukumoto, T. et al. Cancer Res. 79, 5482–5489 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Plass.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hey, J., Llamazares Prada, M. & Plass, C. HDAC6 score: to treat or not to treat?. Nat Cancer 4, 156–158 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-022-00494-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-022-00494-8

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer