Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Quantitative profiling of posttranslational modifications of pathological tau via sarkosyl fractionation and mass spectrometry

Abstract

Tau protein aggregation is associated with posttranslational modifications (PTMs) in 75% of all dementia cases. The distribution of tau pathology and the presence of specific tau phosphorylation sites of interest are typically visualized and measured using antibodies. However, previous knowledge of the target epitopes is required. Additionally, antibodies can be used in a semi-quantitative manner but cannot be used to determine the absolute amount of tau or the extent of the modifications at specific sites or domains. Here we present a discovery assay that characterizes the global qualitative and quantitative tau modification landscape of a sample without a priori knowledge. Our workflow uses sarkosyl fractionation to extract the pathological tau species from sample-limited brain specimens, followed by mass spectrometry (MS) to characterize and quantify tau PTMs. The two-step MS-based proteomics approach includes an exploratory tau PTM analysis and a targeted full-length expressed stable isotope-labeled tau assay, which monitors specific unmodified tau peptides using a heavy isotope-labeled internal standard as a reference. This enables the absolute quantification of the respective tau peptides and the total tau amount in the sample, thus providing the modification extent of tau PTMs. This approach provides precise, comprehensive, qualitative and quantitative tau PTM profiling of the sample. It also enables the detailed molecular comparison of tau across multiple experiments, including a comparison between neurodegenerative diseases, stages of the disease, human patient heterogeneity and characterization of animal models. The approach is useful for studying the molecular features of pathological tau in neurodegeneration. The procedure requires 7–8 d and is suitable for users with expertise in targeted and untargeted MS-based protein analysis.

Key points

  • A biochemical approach for the characterization of pathological protein aggregates, in which an untargeted mass spectrometry proteomics approach is used to map tau modifications, followed by a full-length expressed stable isotope-labeled tau (FLEXITau) assay that monitors unmodified tau peptides in a targeted manner, enabling posttranslational modification (PTM) quantification.

  • The approach improves on the use of targeted antibodies for detecting specific modifications as it can be used without prior knowledge of either PTM type or PTM site.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of the comprehensive MS-based workflow to identify and quantify the modification profile of pathological Tau species.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Proteomics data from studies that applied this workflow are available via ProteomeXchange (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) with the dataset identifiers PXD033965, PXD020517, PXD020483, PXD020482, PXD020538 and PXD020717.

References

  1. Arakhamia, T. et al. Posttranslational modifications mediate the structural diversity of tauopathy strains. Cell 184, 6207–6210 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mair, W. et al. FLEXITau: quantifying post-translational modifications of Tau protein in vitro and in human disease. Anal. Chem. 88, 3704–3714 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Naseri, N. N., Wang, H., Guo, J., Sharma, M. & Luo, W. The complexity of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 705, 183–194 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schaffert, L. N. & Carter, W. G. Do post-translational modifications influence protein aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review. Brain Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10040232 (2020).

  5. Wenger, K. et al. Common mouse models of tauopathy reflect early but not late human disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 18, 10 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wesseling, H. et al. Tau PTM profiles identify patient heterogeneity and stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 183, 1699–1713 e1613 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, Z. et al. Cleavage of tau by asparagine endopeptidase mediates the neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 20, 1254–1262 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dujardin, S. et al. Tau molecular diversity contributes to clinical heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 26, 1256–1263 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. MacLean, B. et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 966–968 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 AG071858 and U01 NS110438). We thank the Rainwater Charitable Foundation and the Ellison Foundation for their interest and support of tauopathy research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Methodology: K.W., A.V., M.K., H.S. and J.A.S. Writing: K.W., A.V., M.K., H.S. and J.A.S. Visualization: K.W. and J.A.S. Funding acquisition: J.A.S. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith A. Steen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Cristian Lasagna-Reeves, Martin Larsen and Danielle Swaney for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Mair, W. et al. Anal. Chem. 88, 3704–3714 (2016): https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04509

Wenger, K. et al. Mol. Neurodegener. 18, 10 (2023): https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-023-00601-y

Wesseling, H. et al. Cell 183, 1699–1713.e13 (2020): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.029

Dujardin, S. et al. Nat. Med. 26, 1256–1263 (2020): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0938-9

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Fig. 1.

Supplementary Table 1

Transition list including monitored precursors and fragments of the FLEXITau assay.

Supplementary Data 1

Sequence of FLEXITau expression vector and the corresponding protein product.

Supplementary Data 2

Skyline library for FLEXITau data evaluation containing all monitored precursors and fragments of the FLEXITau assay.

Supplementary Data 3

Example for evaluating FLEXITau data, including the calculation of absolute total tau amount and the relative modification extent.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wenger, K., Viode, A., Kumar, M. et al. Quantitative profiling of posttranslational modifications of pathological tau via sarkosyl fractionation and mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 19, 1235–1251 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00939-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00939-z

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing