The death of George Floyd in 2020 sparked intense emotion, and increased recognition of the need to take active measures in matters of race within science and academia. This piece considers the field’s immediate actions with regard to Black representation at neuroscience conferences, and whether we are rising to the occasion in an area under our control.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Change history
10 December 2021
In the version of this Comment initially published, an unfortunate composition error in the sentence now reading “It is worth noting that several (but not all) of these conferences were diverse in other ways” was present (“noting” appeared as “nothing”) and has been corrected in this file as of 10 December 2021.
References
Civil Rights Act of 1964 78 Stat. 241 (1964).
Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 82 Stat.73 (1968).
Civil Rights Act of 1991 PL. 102–166 (1991).
SfN Statement on Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity https://www.sfn.org/publications/latest-news/2020/06/02/sfn-statement-on-diversity,-inclusion,-and-equity (2020).
Cell Editorial Team Cell 181, 1443–1444 (2020).
Nature 582, 147 (2020).
Hofstra, B. et al. The diversity-innovation paradox in science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9284–9291 (2020).
Walker, R. Early Am. Stud. 19, 601–640 (2021).
Brandt, A. M. Racism and Research: The Case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (The Hastings Center, 1978).
Truog, R. D., Kesselheim, A. S. & Joffe, S. Science 337, 37–38 (2012).
Hardeman, R. R., Medina, E. M. & Kozhimannil, K. B. N. Engl. J Med. 375, 2113–2115 (2016).
Pollock, A. R. D. et al. Catalyst 3, 1–38 (2017).
Jones, C. P. Ethn. Dis. 28, 231–234 (2018).
Burke, L. #ShutDownSTEM Inside Higher Ed https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/06/11/scientists-strike-black-lives-more-inclusive-academia (2020).
Society for Neuroscience Black Lives Matter and Neuroscience: Why This Moment Matters https://neuronline.sfn.org/diversity/black-lives-matter-and-neuroscience (2020).
Ramos, R. L., Alvina, K. & Martinez, L. R. J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ. 16, A6–A13 (2017).
NCES Characteristics of Postsecondary Faculty https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/csc (2020).
Gibbs, K. D., Basson, J., Xierali, I. M. & Broniatowski, D. A. Elife 5, e21393 (2016).
Valantine, H. A., Lund, P. K. & Gammie, A. E. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 15, 3 (2016).
Hodes, R. J. Diversity in Scientific Meetings and Conferences Optimizes Research Innovations https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/diversity-scientific-meetings-and-conferences-optimizes-research-innovations (National Institute on Aging, 2019).
Nat. Methods 16, 563 (2019).
Platt, M. O. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 783–784 (2020).
Pendergrass, A. et al. Guide to Organizing Inclusive Scientific Meetings: Where to Start (500 Women Scientists, 2019).
Crutcher, B. N. Liberal Educ. 100, 2 (2014).
Forrester, N. Nature 585, S65–S67 (2020).
Foxx, A. J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14931–14936 (2019).
Acknowledgements
I thank my colleagues on the ASNR Executive Board and the ASNR Program Committee, and the many colleagues who have reached out and asked me questions about what they can do.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Neuroscience thanks Sheena Josselyn, Bianca Marlin, Lucina Uddin, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Table.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wheaton, L.A. Racial equity and inclusion still lacking in neuroscience meetings. Nat Neurosci 24, 1645–1647 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00964-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00964-9
This article is cited by
-
Confronting racially exclusionary practices in the acquisition and analyses of neuroimaging data
Nature Neuroscience (2023)