Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Avoid the reproduction of coloniality in decolonial studies in ecology

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 7, pages 306–309 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Calls to decolonize disciplines and institutions circulate in the scientific community. In ecology, only the surface of the colonial structure has been scratched. We propose that two gaps must be filled to decolonize the ‘decolonial turn’ itself: recognition of decolonial theories produced in the Global South and a deeper historical and socioeconomic analysis of forms of production and validation of knowledge in ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Guidance for decolonializing research in ecology.

References

  1. Lander, E. A. A colonialidade do saber: eurocentrismo e ciencias sociais. Perspectivas latino-americanas (CLACSO, 2005).

  2. Césaire, A. Guaraguao 20, 157–193 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fanon, F. Black Skin, White Masks (Pluto, 1986).

  4. Mbembe, A. Arts Humanit. High. Educ. 15, 29–45 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rivera Cusicanqui, S. Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: una reflexión sobre prácticas y discursosdescolonizadores (Tinta Limón, 2010).

  6. Castro-Gómez, S. & Grosfoguel, R. El Giro Decolonial (Siglo del hombre, 2007).

  7. Grosfoguel, R. Rev. (Fernand Braudel Center) 25, 203–224 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quijano, A. Int. Sociol. 15, 215–232 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Visvanathan, S. in Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement (eds Leach, M. et al.) 83–97 (Zed Books, 2005).

  10. Spivak, G. C. Can the Subaltern Speak? (Routledge, 1994).

  11. Bhargava, R. Glob. Policy 4, 413–417 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhambra, G. K. Crit. Times 4, 73–89 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sousa Santos, B. Rev. (Fernand Braudel Center) 30, 45–89 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maas, B. et al. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12797 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nuñez, M. A. et al. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 4–9 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohammed, R. S. et al. Am. Nat. 200, 140–155 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rau, J. et al. Ecol. Austral 27, 312–496 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raja, N. B. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 145–154 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Trisos, C. H., Auerbach, J. & Katti, M. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1205–1212 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eichhorn, M. P., Baker, K. & Griffiths, M. Front. Biogeogr. 12, 1–7 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baker, K., Eichhorn, M. P. & Griffiths, M. Biotropica 51, 288–292 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brandt, S. et al. Ecol. Evol. 10, 12450–12456 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. McGill, B. M. et al. Ecol. Evol. 11, 3636–3645 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Melles, S. J. et al. Ecoscience 26, 323–340 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Adebisi, F. Decolonisation is not about ticking a box: it must disrupt. criticallegalthinking.com, https://criticallegalthinking.com/2020/03/12/decolonisation-is-not-about-ticking-a-box/ (12 March 2020).

  26. Güttler, N. Ber. Wiss. 42, 235–258 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Worster, D. J. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas, 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994).

  28. Nicolson, M. Hist. Sci. 26, 183–200 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lewinsohn, T. M. Filos. História Biol. 11, 347–381 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Raby, M. The Study of Ecology in Latin America and the Caribbean (Oxford Univ Press, 2021).

  31. Mignolo, W. D. Coloniality at Large: Time and the Colonial Difference (Taylor & Francis, 2020).

  32. Simpson, D. Y., Beatty, A. E. & Ballen, C. J. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 4–8 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith, L. T. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (Zed Books, 2013).

  34. Grosfoguel, R. Tabula Rasa 24, 123–143 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior – Brazil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001. M.N.C.H. received a PhD studentship from CAPES. C.R.F. was supported by CNPq (PQ 306812/2017-7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil

    María N. Clerici Hirschfeld & Carlos Roberto Fonseca

  2. Instituto Latino-Americano de Ciências da Vida e da Natureza, Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil

    Luiz R. R. Faria

Authors
  1. María N. Clerici Hirschfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luiz R. R. Faria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos Roberto Fonseca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María N. Clerici Hirschfeld.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hirschfeld, M.N.C., Faria, L.R.R. & Fonseca, C.R. Avoid the reproduction of coloniality in decolonial studies in ecology. Nat Ecol Evol 7, 306–309 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01971-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01971-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene