Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Temperature effect on erosion-induced disturbances to soil organic carbon cycling

Subjects

Abstract

Erosion exerts control on soil organic carbon (SOC) and both erosion and SOC are affected by climate. To what extent temperature controls the coupling between these erosion–C interactions remains unclear. Using 137Cs and SOC inventories from catchments spanning different climates, we find that increasing decomposition rates with temperature result in the efficient replacement of SOC laterally lost by erosion in eroding areas but lower preservation of deposited SOC in depositional areas. When combined at the landscape level, the erosion-induced C sink strength per unit lateral SOC flux increases with temperature from 0.19 g C (g C)−1 at 0 °C to 0.24 g C (g C)−1 at 25 °C. We estimated that the global C sink of 0.050 Pg C yr−1 induced by water erosion on croplands increases by 7% because of climate change. Our results reveal a negative feedback loop between climate change and erosion-induced disturbance to SOC cycling.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Variation of SOC cycling metrics on eroding croplands with temperature.
Fig. 2: Temperature effects on SOC cycling metrics on eroding croplands at the global scale.
Fig. 3: Spatial variation of SOC cycling metrics on eroding croplands.
Fig. 4: Response of SOC cycling in eroding croplands to climate change.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The SOC stock of the top 1 m generated by the Harmonized World Soil Database is available at https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/data-hub/soil-maps-and-databases/harmonized-world-soil-database-v12/en/. The SOC stock of the top 1 m generated by the Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database is available at https://bolin.su.se/data/ncscd/tiff.php. The MODIS NPP dataset is available at http://files.ntsg.umt.edu/data/NTSG_Products/MOD17/GeoTIFF/MOD17A3/. The land use data generated by the History database of the Global Environment (HYDE) is available at https://dataportaal.pbl.nl/downloads/HYDE/. The mean annual temperature provided by the Climatic Research Unit is available at https://www.uea.ac.uk/web/groups-and-centres/climatic-research-unit/data. The mean annual precipitation provided by the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre is available at https://opendata.dwd.de/climate_environment/GPCC/html/fulldata-monthly_v2018_doi_download.html. The MODIS potential evapotranspiration (PET) data are available at http://files.ntsg.umt.edu/data/NTSG_Products/MOD16/MOD16A3.105_MERRAGMAO/. The mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation as well as the surface soil moisture (0–10 cm) of historical simulations and future projections generated by global climate models of coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP6) are available at https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/projects/cmip6/. The basemap data used to create figures were downloaded at http://naturalearthdata.com/downloads/. The 137Cs inventory and SOC stock data are available from the corresponding author on request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The codes of C–erosion coupling model programmed in MATLAB are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7224539 (ref. 59).

References

  1. Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304, 1623–1627 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amundson, R. et al. Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science 348, 1261071 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crowther, T. W. et al. Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming. Nature 540, 104–108 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nottingham, A. T., Meir, P., Velasquez, E. & Turner, B. L. Soil carbon loss by experimental warming in a tropical forest. Nature 584, 234–237 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Xue, K. et al. Tundra soil carbon is vulnerable to rapid microbial decomposition under climate warming. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 595–600 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Houghton, R. A. & Nassikas, A. A. Global and regional fluxes of carbon from land use and land cover change 1850–2015. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 31, 456–472 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hicks Pries, C. E., Castanha, C., Porras, R. C. & Torn, M. S. The whole-soil carbon flux in response to warming. Science 355, 1420–1423 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davidson, E. A. & Janssens, I. A. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440, 165–173 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahecha, M. D. et al. Global convergence in the temperature sensitivity of respiration at ecosystem level. Science 329, 838–840 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carvalhais, N. et al. Global covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 514, 213–217 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koven, C. D., Hugelius, G., Lawrence, D. M. & Wieder, W. R. Higher climatological temperature sensitivity of soil carbon in cold than warm climates. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 817–822 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sistla, S. A. et al. Long-term warming restructures Arctic tundra without changing net soil carbon storage. Nature 497, 615–618 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorrepaal, E. et al. Carbon respiration from subsurface peat accelerated by climate warming in the subarctic. Nature 460, 616–619 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Karhu, K. et al. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration rates enhanced by microbial community response. Nature 513, 81–84 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Knorr, W., Prentice, I. C., House, J. I. & Holland, E. A. Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature 433, 298–301 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Galy, V., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B. & Eglinton, T. Global carbon export from the terrestrial biosphere controlled by erosion. Nature 521, 204–207 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stallard, R. F. Terrestrial sedimentation and the carbon cycle: coupling weathering and erosion to carbon burial. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 12, 231–257 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Regnier, P. et al. Anthropogenic perturbation of the carbon fluxes from land to ocean. Nat. Geosci. 6, 597–607 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Montgomery, D. R. Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13268–13272 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cerdan, O. et al. Rates and spatial variations of soil erosion in Europe: a study based on erosion plot data. Geomorphology 122, 167–177 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Oost, K. et al. The impact of agricultural soil erosion on the global carbon cycle. Science 318, 626–629 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chappell, A., Baldock, J. & Sanderman, J. The global significance of omitting soil erosion from soil organic carbon cycling schemes. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 187–191 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Raymond, P. A. et al. Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503, 355–359 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lauerwald, R., Laruelle, G. G., Hartmann, J., Ciais, P. & Regnier, P. A. G. Spatial patterns in CO2 evasion from the global river network. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 534–554 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gudasz, C. et al. Temperature-controlled organic carbon mineralization in lake sediments. Nature 466, 478–481 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Marotta, H. et al. Greenhouse gas production in low-latitude lake sediments responds strongly to warming. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 467–470 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rommens, T. et al. Soil erosion and sediment deposition in the Belgian loess belt during the Holocene: establishing a sediment budget for a small agricultural catchment. Holocene 15, 1032–1043 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Phillips, J. D. Fluvial sediment budgets in the North Carolina Piedmont. Geomorphology 4, 231–241 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Trimble, S. W. & Crosson, P. U.S. Soil erosion rates—myth and reality. Science 289, 248–250 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Harden, J. W. et al. Dynamic replacement and loss of soil carbon on eroding cropland. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 885–901 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Billings, S. A., Buddemeier, R. W., Richter, D. D., Van Oost, K. & Bohling, G. A simple method for estimating the influence of eroding soil profiles on atmospheric CO2. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 24, GB2001 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Berhe, A. A., Harden, J. W., Torn, M. S. & Harte, J. Linking soil organic matter dynamics and erosion-induced terrestrial carbon sequestration at different landform positions. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 113, G04039 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nadeu, E., Berhe, A. A., de Vente, J. & Boix-Fayos, C. Erosion, deposition and replacement of soil organic carbon in Mediterranean catchments: a geomorphological, isotopic and land use change approach. Biogeosciences 9, 1099–1111 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, Z. et al. The fate of buried organic carbon in colluvial soils: a long-term perspective. Biogeosciences 11, 873–883 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, Z., Van Oost, K. & Govers, G. Predicting the long-term fate of buried organic carbon in colluvial soils. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 65–79 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. VandenBygaart, A. J., Kroetsch, D., Gregorich, E. G. & Lobb, D. Soil C erosion and burial in cropland. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 1441–1452 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Burdige, D. J. Burial of terrestrial organic matter in marine sediments: a re-assessment. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB4011 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sobek, S. et al. Organic carbon burial efficiency in lake sediments controlled by oxygen exposure time and sediment source. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 2243–2254 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Doetterl, S. et al. Erosion, deposition and soil carbon: a review of process-level controls, experimental tools and models to address C cycling in dynamic landscapes. Earth Sci. Rev. 154, 102–122 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, Z. et al. Human-induced erosion has offset one-third of carbon emissions from land cover change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 345–349 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jobbágy, E. G. & Jackson, R. B. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol. Appl. 10, 423–436 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Meyer, N., Welp, G. & Amelung, W. The temperature sensitivity (Q10) of soil respiration: controlling factors and spatial prediction at regional scale based on environmental soil classes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 32, 306–323 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou, T., Shi, P., Hui, D. & Luo, Y. Global pattern of temperature sensitivity of soil heterotrophic respiration (Q10) and its implications for carbon–climate feedback. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 114, G02016 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Doetterl, S., Van Oost, K. & Six, J. Towards constraining the magnitude of global agricultural sediment and soil organic carbon fluxes. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 37, 642–655 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kosmas, C. et al. The effects of tillage displaced soil on soil properties and wheat biomass. Soil Tillage Res. 58, 31–44 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Dercon, G. et al. Spatial variability in crop response under contour hedgerow systems in the Andes region of Ecuador. Soil Tillage Res. 86, 15–26 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lugato, E., Lavallee, J. M., Haddix, M. L., Panagos, P. & Cotrufo, M. F. Different climate sensitivity of particulate and mineral-associated soil organic matter. Nat. Geosci. 14, 95–300 (2021).

  48. Borrelli, P. et al. Land use and climate change impacts on global soil erosion by water (2015–2070). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 21994–22001 (2020).

  49. Min, S.-K., Zhang, X., Zwiers, F. W. & Hegerl, G. C. Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470, 378–381 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Li, Z. & Fang, H. Impacts of climate change on water erosion: a review. Earth Sci. Rev. 163, 94–117 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sutton, R. T. & Hawkins, E. ESD ideas: global climate response scenarios for IPCC assessments. Earth Syst. Dynam. 11, 751–754 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Walker, T. W. N. et al. Microbial temperature sensitivity and biomass change explain soil carbon loss with warming. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 885–889 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Berner, R. A., Lasaga, A. C. & Garrels, R. M. The carbonate–silicate geochemical cycle and its effect on atmospheric carbon dioxide over the past 100 million years. Am. J. Sci. 283, 641–683 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gaillardet, J., Dupré, B., Louvat, P. & Allègre, C. J. Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers. Chem. Geol. 159, 3–30 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Quine, T. A. & Van Oost, K. Quantifying carbon sequestration as a result of soil erosion and deposition: retrospective assessment using caesium-137 and carbon inventories. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2610–2625 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Van Oost, K. et al. Legacy of human-induced C erosion and burial on soil–atmosphere C exchange. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19492–19497 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Van Oost, K. et al. Landscape-scale modeling of carbon cycling under the impact of soil redistribution: the role of tillage erosion. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB4014 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gerwitz, A. & Page, E. R. An empirical mathematical model to describe plant root systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 11, 773–781 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, Z. Erosion-C model. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7224539 (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Z.W., G.T. and J.Q. are funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42171025 and 41971031). A.N. is funded by the MCIN/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ (grant no. PID2019-104857RB-I00 and PID2019-103946RJ-100).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.W. and Y.Z. conceived the research, performed the analysis and co-wrote the paper. G.G., G.T., T.A.Q., J.Q., A.N., H.F., Q.T. and K.V.O. assisted in the interpretation of the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Climate Change thanks Asmeret Berhe, Julian Campo, Amaury Frankl, Priyanka Singh and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Locations of the cropland sites in this study.

The numbers in squares denote the identification of the catchment. Details of the study sites are provided in Supplementary Table 1.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Relationships between normalized SOC stocks and soil redistribution rates for the cropland sites.

Negative values of soil redistribution rates indicate erosion, while the positive values indicate deposition. The SOC stock of each soil profile is normalized by being divided by the SOC stock of the reference sites (as denoted with red asterisks) not subjected to erosion or deposition. The regression lines are set to pass through the reference value so that the sensitivity of normalized SOC stocks to the variation of soil distribution rates can be assessed by comparing the slopes of these linear regression lines. The number in parentheses denote the identification of the catchment, which is shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 SOC cycling in eroding croplands in scenarios of various C input rates.

a, Variation of SOC stocks with soil redistribution rates. b, Variation of the normalized SOC stocks with soil redistribution rates. c, Variation of replace ratios of lost SOC due to erosion in the eroding area with soil redistribution rates and variation of burial efficiencies of deposited SOC in the depositional area with soil redistribution rates. d, Variation of the erosion-induced C sink per unit lateral C flux with C input rates. In a, b and c, the negative values of soil redistribution rates indicate erosion, while the positive values indicate deposition. In b, the SOC stock of each soil profile is normalized by being divided by the SOC stock of the reference sites not subjected to erosion or deposition. For a hillslope with a given soil redistribution pattern, variations in normalized SOC stocks, C replacement and burial efficiency and the C sink strength per unit of lateral SOC flux are independent of the C input rate.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 SOC cycling in eroding croplands in scenarios of various C decomposition rates.

a, Variation of SOC stocks with soil redistribution rates. b, Variation of the normalized SOC stocks with soil redistribution rates. c, Variation of replace ratios of lost SOC due to erosion in the eroding area with soil redistribution rates and variation of burial efficiencies of deposited SOC in the depositional area with soil redistribution rates. d, Variation of the erosion-induced total C sink per unit lateral C flux with C decomposition rates. In a, b and c, the negative values of soil redistribution rate indicate erosion, while the positive values indicate deposition. In b, the SOC stock of each soil profile is normalized by being divided by the SOC stock of the reference sites not subjected to erosion or deposition.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 SOC cycling in eroding croplands in scenarios of varying temperature.

a, Variation of SOC stocks with soil redistribution rates. b, Variation of the normalized SOC stocks with soil redistribution rates. c, Variation of replacement ratio of lost SOC due to erosion in the eroding area with soil redistribution rates and variation of burial efficiency of deposited SOC in the depositional area with soil redistribution rates. d, Variation of the erosion-induced C sink per unit lateral C flux with temperature. In a, b and c, the negative values of soil redistribution rate indicate erosion, while the positive values indicate deposition. In b, the SOC stock of each soil profile is normalized by being divided by the SOC stock of the reference sites not subjected to erosion or deposition.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Relationships between erosion and climatic factors in croplands derived from a global estimation of agricultural erosion21.

a, Soil erosion rate versus mean annual precipitation. b, Mean annual precipitation versus mean annual temperature. c, Soil erosion rate versus mean annual temperature. d, C erosion rate versus mean annual temperature.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 The effects of soil moisture on the relationships between temperature and various SOC cycling metrics.

a, The relationship between soil moisture and the coefficient denoting the sensitivity of lateral SOC fluxes caused by erosion to the variation of mean annual temperature. Details of the regression between lateral SOC fluxes by erosion and temperature under various soil moisture conditions are displayed in Supplementary Fig. 3. b, The relationship between soil moisture and the coefficient denoting the sensitivity of SOC decomposition rates to the variation of mean annual temperature. Details of the regression between SOC decomposition rates and temperature under various soil moisture conditions are displayed in Supplementary Fig. 4. c, The relationship between soil moisture and the coefficient denoting the sensitivity of the C sink strength per unit lateral SOC flux to the variation of mean annual temperature. Details of the regression between the C sink strength per unit lateral SOC flux and temperature under various soil moisture conditions are displayed in Supplementary Fig. 5. d, The relationship between soil moisture and the coefficient denoting the sensitivity of the C sink strength per unit cropland area to the variation of mean annual temperature. Details of the regression between the C sink strength per unit cropland area and temperature under various soil moisture conditions are displayed in Supplementary Fig. 6.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Tables 1–4 and Figs. 1–9.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Govers, G. et al. Temperature effect on erosion-induced disturbances to soil organic carbon cycling. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 174–181 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01562-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01562-8

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing