Bifurcating the population as either verbal or visual thinkers is one of the simplest ways to classify intelligence. Bruce Gibb argues that visual thinking is key to chemistry, and that teaching and testing must focus on this type of thinking rather than traditional approaches promoting verbal thinking skills.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Grandin, T. Visual Thinking: The Hidden Gifts of People Who Think in Pictures, Patterns, and Abstractions (Riverhead Books, 2022).
Gardner, H. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (Basic Books, 2011).
West, T. G. In The Mind’s Eye 3rd edn (Prometheus, 2009).
Hadamard, J. An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field 142–143 (Dover Publications, 1954).
Armstrong, T. The Power of Neurodiversity: Unleashing the Advantages of your Differently Wired Brain (Da Capo Press, 2010).
Ball, P. What does AI mean for chemistry? Chemistry World (6 February 2023); https://www.chemistryworld.com/features/what-does-ai-mean-for-chemistry/4016813.article
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibb, B.C. The implicit bias impeding chemistry. Nat. Chem. 15, 589–590 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01195-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01195-0
This article is cited by
-
Using spatial and logical-mathematical intelligence for information wayfinding
Nature Chemistry (2023)