Can the recent Discovery mission selections be used as tea leaves to understand the future directions of NASA? In an age of many programmes being used to advance administrative and programmatic goals, Discovery appears to be driven almost entirely by science and by NASA's goal of cheaper missions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
References
Announcement of Opportunity: New Frontiers 4 NNH16ZDA011O (NASA, 2017); http://go.nature.com/2mFqudJ
Announcement of Opportunity: Discovery 2014 NNH14ZDA014O (NASA, 2015); http://go.nature.com/2mBkK41
NASA selects two missions to explore the early Solar System. NASA (4 January 2017); http://go.nature.com/2mAYtDC
Levison, H. F. et al. in 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2061 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2016); http://go.nature.com/2lY4177
Elkins-Tanton, L. T. et al. in 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 1631 (Lunar and Planetary Institute, 2016); http://go.nature.com/2m20OEy
New Horizons receives mission extension to Kuiper belt, Dawn to remain at Ceres. NASA (1 July 2016); http://go.nature.com/2necnJ1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
A’Hearn, M. The future of NASA's missions. Nat Astron 1, 0095 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0095
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0095
This article is cited by
-
Small bodies looming large in planetary science
Nature Astronomy (2019)
-
China’s roadmap for planetary exploration
Nature Astronomy (2018)