At a time when food security is being threatened by climate change and population growth, regulatory systems must be designed to encourage innovation through all available technological means. Proposed changes to the concept of essential derivation will classify all mono-parental varieties as essentially derived, threatening the use of new breeding technologies to deliver crop improvement.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. The international convention for the protection of new varieties of plants. UPOV https://www.upov.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/upov_pub_221.pdf (1991).
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. The international convention for the protection of new varieties of plants. UPOV https://www.upov.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/upov_pub_295.pdf (1978).
Sanderson, J. Plants, People and Practices: The Nature and History of the UPOV Convention 1st edn, Vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
Harvey, J. The UPOV convention - the scope of protection and its general provisions. UPOV https://www.upov.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/upov_pub_697.pdf (1990).
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. Explanatory notes on essentially derived varieties under the 1991 act of the UPOV convention. UPOV https://www.upov.int/edocs/expndocs/en/upov_exn_edv.pdf (2017).
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. Explanatory notes on essentially derived varieties under the 1991 act of the UPOV convention (revision) - with comments prior to WG-EDV/4. UPOV https://www.upov.int/edocs/mdocs/upov/en/wg_edv_4/upov_exn_edv_3_draft_2_with_comments_prior_to_wg_edv_4.pdf (2021).
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. Guidance on the use of biochemical and molecular markers in the examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS). UPOV https://www.upov.int/edocs/tgpdocs/en/tgp_15.pdf (2020).
Lawson, C. Eur. Intellect. Prop. Rev. 36, 499 (2014).
Sanderson, J. Law Context 24, 34 (2006).
Commonwealth Consolidated Acts. Plant Breeder’s Rights Act 1994. Australasian Legal Information Institute https://go.nature.com/3wulICw (1994).
Li, J. et al. Nat. Plants 8, 611–616 (2022).
Yu, Q. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1581–1588 (2021).
Yang, C. J. et al. Commun. Biol. 4, 302 (2021).
Kupferschmied, P. Comments from Switzerland in reply to Circular E-21/231 concerning document UPOV/EXN/EDV/3 Draft 3. Federal Office for Agriculture, Swiss Confederation https://www.upov.int/edocs/mdocs/upov/en/c_56/upov_circ_e_21_231_edv_comments_ch.pdf (2021).
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. Frequently asked questions. UPOV https://www.upov.int/about/en/faq.html (2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MacDonald, H., Henry, R.J. Balancing incentives for innovation in new plant varieties. Nat. Plants 8, 1206–1208 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01246-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01246-3