Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Kranthi and Stone reply

Nature Plants volume 6, pages 1321–1322 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 17 November 2020

The Original Article was published on 12 October 2020

The Original Article was published on 12 October 2020

This article has been updated

replying to M. Qaim Nature Plants https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00788-8 (2020)

replying to I. Plewis Nature Plants https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00789-7 (2020)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Change history

  • 17 November 2020

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

  1. Qaim, M. Bt cotton, yields and farmers’ benefits. Nat. Plants https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00788-8 (2020).

  2. Qaim, M. & Zilberman, D. Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Science 299, 900–902 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Qaim, M., Subramanian, A., Naik, G. & Zilberman, D. Adoption of Bt cotton and impact variability: insights from India. Rev. Agric. Econ. 28, 48–58 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kathage, J. & Qaim, M. Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11652–11656 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krishna, V. V. & Qaim, M. Bt cotton and sustainability of pesticide reductions in India. Agric. Syst. 107, 47–55 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dhurua, S. & Gujar, G. T. Field-evolved resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), from India. Pest Manag. Sci. 67, 898–903 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stone, G. D. Towards a general theory of agricultural knowledge production: environmental, social and didactic learning. Cult. Agric. Food Environ. 38, 5–17 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stone, G. D., Flachs, A. & Diepenbrock, C. Rhythms of the herd: long term dynamics in seed choice by Indian farmers. Technol. Soc. 36, 26–38 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stone, G. D. Agricultural deskilling and the spread of genetically modified cotton in Warangal. Curr. Anthropol. 48, 67–103 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Plewis, I. Adopting hybrid Bt cotton: using interrupted time-series analysis to assess its effects on farmers in Northern India. Rev. Agrarian Stud. 9, 2 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plewis, I. Modelling long-term impacts of Bt cotton. Nat. Plants https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00789-7 (2020).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Cotton Advisory Committee, Washington D.C., USA

    K. R. Kranthi & Glenn Davis Stone

  2. Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Glenn Davis Stone

Authors
  1. K. R. Kranthi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Glenn Davis Stone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.R.K. and G.D.S. wrote this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn Davis Stone.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kranthi, K.R., Stone, G.D. Kranthi and Stone reply. Nat. Plants 6, 1321–1322 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00790-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00790-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene