Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Reducing the carbon footprint of cataract surgery: co-creating solutions with a departmental Delphi process

Eye volume 38, pages 1349–1354 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background

Climate change is arguably the greatest threat to global health of the 21st century. Although cataract surgery is a major contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, recent literature review identified a paucity of evidence-based strategies for improving the environmental impact of cataract services. Our study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a departmental Delphi process for improving cataract services’ environmental sustainability.

Methods

All members of ophthalmology theatre teams in a UK teaching hospital were invited to participate in a three-stage Delphi process. Team members were surveyed for suggestions for reducing the department’s environmental impact. Suggested interventions were refined during a plenary face-to-face discussion and ranked. The highest ranked interventions were combined into a mutually agreed action plan. Data on the economic and environmental cost of cataract services was collected prior to and six months after the Delphi process using the Eyefficiency mobile application.

Results

Twenty-three interventions were suggested by a range of staff cadres. Interventions were ranked by 24 team members. The 2nd, 4th, 5th, 8th and 11th ranked interventions were combined into an “Eco-packs” project in collaboration with suppliers (Bausch + Lomb), saving 675 kg of waste and 350 kg of CO2 equivalent annually.

Conclusions

The Delphi process is an effective method for provoking departmental engagement with the sustainability agenda that we would encourage all ophthalmology departments to consider utilising. The baseline per case CO2 equivalent measured in our department was reproducible and could serve as a maximum benchmark to be improved upon.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Photograph showing the changes to the phacoemulsifcation packs following the Delphi process.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, Ball S, Bell S, Bellamy R, et al. Managing the health effects of climate change. Lancet Univ Coll Lond Inst Glob Health Comm Lancet. 2009;373:1693–733.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Watts N, Amann M, Arnell N, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Beagley J, Belesova K, et al. The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises. Lancet. 2020;397:129–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Watts N, Amann M, Arnell N, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Belesova K, Boykoff M, et al. The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate. Lancet. 2019;394:1836–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pichler P-P, Jaccard IS, Weisz U, Weisz H. International comparison of health care carbon footprints. Environ Res Lett. 2019;14:064004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tennison I, Roschnik S, Ashby B, Boyd R, Hamilton I, Oreszczyn T, et al. Health care’s response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. Lancet Planet Heal. 2021;5:e84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. NHS England, NHS Improvement. Delivering a “Net Zero” National Health Service. 2020. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/greenernhs/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2020/10/delivering-a-net-zero-national-health-service.pdf.

  7. National Health Service Digital. Hospital Outpatient Activity. 2018-19. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/hospital-outpatient-activity/2018-19.

  8. Donachie PHJ, Sarrow JM. National Ophthalmology Database Audit: Year 5 Annual Report – The Fourth Prospective Report of the National Ophthalmology Database Audit. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. 2020.

  9. MacNeill AJ, Lillywhite R, Brown CJ. The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. Lancet Planet Heal. 2017;1:e360–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morris DS, Wright T, Somner JEA, Connor A. The carbon footprint of cataract surgery. Eye. 2013;27:495–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Buchan JC, Norman P, Shickle D, Cassels-Brown A, MacEwen C. Failing to plan and planning to fail. Can we predict the future growth of demand on UK Eye Care Services? Eye. 2019;33:1029–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Buchan JC, Thiel CL, Steyn A, Somner J, Venkatesh R, Burton MJ, et al. Addressing the environmental sustainability of eye health-care delivery: a scoping review. Lancet Planet Heal. 2022;6:e524–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:979–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mathewson PA, Williams GP, Watson SL, Hodson J, Bron AJ, Rauz S. Defining ocular surface disease activity and damage indices by an International Delphi Consultation. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:97–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Douglas RS, Tsirbas A, Gordon M, Lee D, Khadavi N, Garneau HC, et al. Development of criteria for evaluating clinical response in thyroid eye disease using a modified delphi technique. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1155–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Buchan JC, Dean WH, Foster A, Burton MJ. What are the priorities for improving cataract surgical outcomes in Africa? Results of a Delphi exercise. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:1409–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hatemi G, Merkel PA, Hamuryudan V, Boers M, Direskeneli H, Aydin SZ, et al. Outcome measures used in clinical trials for Behçet syndrome: a systematic review. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:599–612.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Goel H, Wemyss TA, Harris T, Steinbach I, Stancliffe R, Cassels-Brown A, et al. Improving productivity, costs and environmental impact in International Eye Health Services: using the “Eyefficiency” cataract surgical services auditing tool to assess the value of cataract surgical services. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021;6:e000642.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Thiel CL, Cassels-Brown A, Goel H, Stancliffe R, Steinbach I, Thomas P, et al. Utilizing off-the-shelf LCA methods to develop a ‘triple bottom line’ auditing tool for global cataract surgical services. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020;158:104805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Latta M, Shaw C, Gale J. The carbon footprint of cataract surgery in Wellington. N Z Med J. 2021;134:13–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Health Research Authority. Do I need NHS REC review? Available from: http://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/ethics/. Accessed 22nd December 2023.

  22. Watts N, Adger WN, Agnolucci P, Blackstock J, Byass P, Cai W, et al. Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health. Lancet. 2015;386:1861–914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McGill B, Corbett L, Grunseit AC, Irving M, O’hara BJ. Co-produce, co-design, co-create, or co-construct—who does it and how is it done in chronic disease prevention? A scoping review. Healthc. 2022;10:647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, Department for Environmental Food and Rural Affairs. Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors 2023. 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2023. Accessed 22nd December 2023.

  25. Public Health England. Atlas of variation in risk factors and healthcare for vision in England. 2021. Available from: https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/atlas-of-variation.

  26. Bell CM, Hatch WV, Cernat G, Urbach DR. Surgeon volumes and selected patient outcomes in cataract surgery. A population-based analysis. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:405–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dean WH, Gichuhi S, Buchan JC, Makupa W, Mukome A, Otiti-Sengeri J, et al. Intense simulation-based surgical education for manual small-incision cataract surgery: the ophthalmic learning and improvement initiative in cataract surgery randomized clinical trial in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139:9–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dean WH, Buchan J, Gichuhi S, Philippin H, Arunga S, Mukome A, et al. Simulation-based surgical education for glaucoma versus conventional training alone: the GLAucoma Simulated Surgery (GLASS) trial. A multicentre, multicountry, randomised controlled, investigator-masked educational intervention efficacy trial in Kenya, So. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;106:863–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK

    Jonathan Malcolm, Amy Dodd, Mohammad Shaikh, Andrew Cassels-Brown & John C. Buchan

  2. International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK

    John C. Buchan

  3. Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database, 18 Stephenson Way, London, NW1 2HD, UK

    John C. Buchan

Authors
  1. Jonathan Malcolm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy Dodd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Shaikh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew Cassels-Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John C. Buchan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JB and ACB conceptualised study. JB was Delphi process coordinator. MS and AD collected Eyefficiency data. All authors contributed to data analysis. JM and JB drafted and revised manuscript. All authors offered comments and agreed the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Malcolm.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malcolm, J., Dodd, A., Shaikh, M. et al. Reducing the carbon footprint of cataract surgery: co-creating solutions with a departmental Delphi process. Eye 38, 1349–1354 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02902-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02902-4

Search

Advanced search

Quick links