Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Are isolated ocular motor nerve palsies in the elderly truly ‘low risk’ for abnormal neuro-imaging outcomes?

Abstract

Background

Neurologically isolated ocular motor nerve palsies often present a management dilemma. Neuroimaging is more likely to be offered to patients <50 years without coexisting ischaemic risk factors as their risk of sinister underlying causes is thought to be higher. However, populations are rapidly ageing and advanced neuroimaging is now more widely available. We thus investigated the incidence of abnormal neuroimaging outcomes in the traditionally low-risk older patient group.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of 353 patients presenting with isolated ocular motor nerve palsies to a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology service in Singapore over a four-year (2015 to 2019) period. Clinical data was obtained through manual review of case records. Common aetiologies, age-based differences in prevalence of causes and abnormal neuroimaging outcomes were statistically analysed.

Results

Abnormal neuroimaging outcomes were significantly greater in the younger cohort only when age segregation was performed at 60 years of age. In a multivariate analysis, acute onset rather than ischaemic risk factors were independently predictive of normal neuroimaging outcomes. After adjusting for prior cancer risk and clinical bias from presumed ischaemic palsies, abnormal neuroimaging outcomes were seen in 14.1% ≥ 50 yrs, 10.9% ≥ 60 yrs and 15.1% ≥ 70 yrs.

Conclusions

In patients presenting with isolated ocular motor nerve palsies, acute onset may be a more reliable indicator of an ischaemic palsy rather than advanced age or presence of ischaemic risk factors. If onset is not acute, neuroimaging should be considered irrespective of age and coexisting ischaemic risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Aetiologies and neuroimaging outcomes of isolated ocular motor nerve palsies by age group.
Fig. 2: Abnormal neuroimaging yield using different age cutoffs.
Fig. 3: Proposed protocol for management of isolated ocular motor nerve palsises.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Pineles SL, Velez FG. Isolated ocular motor nerve palsies. J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil [Internet]. 2018;68:70–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Galtrey CM, Schon F, Nitkunan A. Microvascular non-arteritic ocular motor nerve palsies - what we know and how should we treat? Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2015;39:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tamhankar MA, Biousse V, Ying GS, Prasad S, Subramanian PS, Lee MS, et al. Isolated third, fourth, and sixth cranial nerve palsies from presumed microvascular versus other causes: a prospective study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chou KL, Galetta SL, Liu GT, Volpe NJ, Bennett JL, Asbury AK, et al. Acute ocular motor mononeuropathies: prospective study of the roles of neuroimaging and clinical assessment. J Neurol Sci. 2004;219:35–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murchison AP, Gilbert ME, Savino PJ. Neuroimaging and acute ocular motor mononeuropathies: a prospective study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:301–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Park KA, Oh SY, Min JH, Kim BJ, Kim Y. Cause of acquired onset of diplopia due to isolated third, fourth, and sixth cranial nerve palsies in patients aged 20 to 50 years in Korea: a high resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurol Sci [Internet]. 2019;407:116546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akagi T, Miyamoto K, Kashii S, Yoshimura N. Cause and prognosis of neurologically isolated third, fourth, or sixth cranial nerve dysfunction in cases of oculomotor palsy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2008;52:32–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Richards BW, Jones FR, Younge BR. Causes and prognosis in 4,278 cases of paralysis of the oculomotor, trochlear, and abducens cranial nerves. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:489–96.

  9. Volpe NJ, Lee AG. Do patients with neurologically isolated ocular motor cranial nerve palsies require prompt neuroimaging? J Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2014;34:301–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keane JR. Fourth nerve palsy: Historical review and study of 215 inpatients. Neurology. 1993;43:2439-43.

  11. Margolin E, Lam CTY. Approach to a patient with diplopia in the emergency department. J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2018;54:799–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Development Core Team R. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria. 2011.

  13. Kung N, Van Stavern G. Isolated ocular motor nerve palsies. Semin Neurol. 2015; 35:539–48.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SYC analysed the data and wrote the manuscript together with SS. JX collected the data. ST, DM, JL and SS conceptualised and helped to supervise the project with SS primarily supervising. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. We thank and acknowledge Prof Umapathi N Thirugnanam for critical comments on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shweta Singhal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chan, SY.C., Hsu, J.CL., Tow, S.L.C. et al. Are isolated ocular motor nerve palsies in the elderly truly ‘low risk’ for abnormal neuro-imaging outcomes?. Eye 38, 773–777 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02775-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02775-7

Search

Quick links