Abstract
Objectives
To identify the risk factors of orbital exenteration and to evaluate the prognosis of exenterated patients with conjunctival melanoma (CM).
Methods
79 consecutive CM patients treated at our centre from January 2000 to September 2021 were included. The demographic, clinical and pathological characteristics were compared between eye-sparing patients and orbital exenteration patients. Main outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DFS) and disease specific survival (DSS) were assessed in exenterated patients.
Results
The mean follow-up period was 46 ± 39 months. Risk factors for orbital exenteration were identified as worse cT category (OR, 50.75; 95% CI, 5.40–477.07; P = 0.001) and greater tumour thickness (OR, 1.27; CI, 1.04–1.55; P = 0.02). Of the 32 patients who underwent orbital exenteration, three (9.4%) had local recurrence; six (18.8%) experienced regional metastasis; sixteen (50.0%) suffered distant metastasis and fifteen (46.9%) died of metastatic disease. In patients who received orbital exenteration, palpebral conjunctiva involvement (PFS: P < 0.01; DFS: P < 0.05; DSS: P = 0.04), histological ulceration (PFS: P = 0.03; DFS: P = 0.01; DSS: P = 0.03) and regression (PFS: P = 0.01; DFS: P < 0.01; DSS: P = 0.04) were identified as risk factors for poor prognosis. Caruncle involvement (P = 0.01) was also associated with increased risk of melanoma related mortality in exenterated patients.
Conclusions
Histopathological factors should be taken into account when formulating surgical plans for orbital exenteration and when evaluating patients’ prognosis following exenteration. For CM patients with caruncle or palpebral conjunctiva involvement, orbital exenteration should be considered for unresectable disease.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 18 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $14.39 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Seregard S. Conjunctival melanoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:321–50.
Zhou C, Wang Y, Jia R, Fan X. Conjunctival melanoma in Chinese patients: local recurrence, metastasis, mortality, and comparisons with caucasian patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:5452–5459.
Missotten GS, Keijser S, De Keizer RJ, De Wolff-Rouendaal D. Conjunctival melanoma in the Netherlands: a nationwide study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:75–82.
Zembowicz A, Mandal RV, Choopong P. Melanocytic lesions of the conjunctiva. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134:1785–92.
Tuomaala S, Eskelin S, Tarkkanen A, Kivelä T. Population-based assessment of clinical characteristics predicting outcome of conjunctival melanoma in whites. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3399–408.
Abt NB, Zhao J, Huang Y, Eghrari AO. Prognostic factors and survival for malignant conjunctival melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma over four decades. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019;40:577–582.
Shields JA, Shields CL, De Potter P. Surgical management of circumscribed conjunctival melanomas. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;14:208–15.
Thariat J, Salleron J, Maschi C, Fevrier E, Lassalle S, Gastaud L, et al. Oncologic and visual outcomes after postoperative proton therapy of localized conjunctival melanomas. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14:239.
Zeng Y, Hu C, Shu L, Pan Y, Zhao L, Pu X, et al. Clinical treatment options for early-stage and advanced conjunctival melanoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;66:461–470.
Karim R, Conway RM. Conservative resection and adjuvant plaque brachytherapy for early-stage conjunctival melanoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;39:293–8.
Grimes JM, Shah NV, Samie FH, Carvajal RD, Marr BP. Conjunctival melanoma: current treatments and future options. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21:371–381.
Rahman I, Cook AE, Leatherbarrow B. Orbital exenteration: a 13 year Manchester experience. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1335–40.
Shields JA, Shields CL, Demirci H, Honavar SG, Singh AD. Experience with eyelid-sparing orbital exenteration: the 2000 Tullos O. Coston Lecture. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;17:355–61.
Paridaens AD, McCartney AC, Minassian DC, Hungerford JL. Orbital exenteration in 95 cases of primary conjunctival malignant melanoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:520–8.
Ma R, Ren H, Zhou X, Gan L, Xu B, Guo J, et al. Orbital exenteration for conjunctival melanoma: comparison of long-term outcome between individualised and conventional techniques. Eye (Lond). 2021;35:3410–18.
Shields JA, Shields CL, Gündüz K, Cater J. Clinical features predictive of orbital exenteration for conjunctival melanoma. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;16:173–8.
Goldberg RA, Kim JW, Shorr N. Orbital exenteration: results of an individualized approach. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:229–36.
Martel A, Oberic A, Moulin A, Zografos L, Bellini L, Almairac F, et al. Orbital exenteration and conjunctival melanoma: a 14-year study at the Jules Gonin Eye Hospital. Eye (Lond). 2020;34:1897–1902.
Paridaens AD, Minassian DC, McCartney AC, Hungerford JL. Prognostic factors in primary malignant melanoma of the conjunctiva: a clinicopathological study of 256 cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:252–9.
Shields CL, Markowitz JS, Belinsky I, Schwartzstein H, George NS, Lally SE, et al. Conjunctival melanoma: outcomes based on tumor origin in 382 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:389–95.e1-2.
Nahon-Estève S, Bertolotto C, Picard-Gauci A, Gastaud L, Baillif S, Hofman P, et al. Small but challenging conjunctival melanoma: new insights, paradigms and future perspectives. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:5691.
Balch CM, Wilkerson JA, Murad TM, Soong SJ, Ingalls AL, Maddox WA. The prognostic significance of ulceration of cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 1980;45:3012–7.
Tas F, Erturk K. Primary tumour ulceration in cutaneous melanoma: its role on TNM stages. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021;51:192–198.
Savar A, Esmaeli B, Ho H, Liu S, Prieto VG. Conjunctival melanoma: local-regional control rates, and impact of high-risk histopathologic features. J Cutan Pathol. 2011;38:18–24.
Esmaeli B, Rubin ML, Xu S, Goepfert RP, Curry JL, Prieto VG, et al. Greater tumor thickness, ulceration, and positive sentinel lymph node are associated with worse prognosis in patients with conjunctival melanoma: implications for future AJCC classifications. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43:1701–1710.
Aung PP, Nagarajan P & Prieto VG. Regression in primary cutaneous melanoma: etiopathogenesis and clinical significance. Lab Invest. 2017;97:657–68.
Cartron AM, Aldana PC, Khachemoune A. Reporting regression in primary cutaneous melanoma. Part 2: prognosis, evaluation and management. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020;45:818–823.
Scholz SL, Hérault J, Stang A, Griewank KG, Meller D, Thariat J, et al. Proton radiotherapy in advanced malignant melanoma of the conjunctiva. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257:1309–1318.
Lodde GC, Jansen P, Möller I, Sucker A, Hassel JC, Forschner A, et al. Genetic characterization of advanced conjunctival melanoma and response to systemic treatment. Eur J Cancer. 2022;166:60–72.
Miura S, Onishi M, Watabe D & Amano H Conjunctival malignant melanoma treated successfully with BRAF inhibitor: encorafenib plus binimetinib. Dermatol Online J. 2022;28:17
Finger PT, Pavlick AC. Checkpoint inhibition immunotherapy for advanced local and systemic conjunctival melanoma: a clinical case series. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:83.
Sagiv O, Thakar SD, Kandl TJ, Ford J, Sniegowski MC, Hwu WJ, et al. Immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 inhibitors for 5 patients with conjunctival melanoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136:1236–1241.
Funding
This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81802702), The Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai (20DZ2270800 and 19JC1410202), Project of Biobank of Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital (YBKA201907), Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai (SHSMU-ZDCX20210902), “New Star of Medical College” Young Medical Talents Training Program in Shanghai in 2020, Young Medical Talents of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission in 2022 (2022YQ001) and The Fund for Excellent Young Scholars of Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine (JYYQ008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YML, RBJ and SQX were responsible for conception and design of the work. CYZ, SCJ, TYZ, HHS, and HT were responsible for data collection. CYZ, SCJ, and TYZ were responsible for data analysis and interpretation. CYZ drafted the original article. All authors revised the final version of the paper to be published.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zong, C., Jia, S., Zhu, T. et al. Risk factors and prognosis of orbital exenteration in conjunctival melanoma. Eye 37, 2272–2280 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02330-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02330-w