Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Associations between childhood ethnoracial minority density, cortical thickness, and social engagement among minority youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis

Abstract

An ethnoracial minority density (EMD) effect in studies of psychotic spectrum disorders has been observed, whereby the risk of psychosis in ethnoracial minority group individuals is inversely related to the proportion of minorities in their area of residence. The authors investigated the relationships among area-level EMD during childhood, cortical thickness (CT), and social engagement (SE) in clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) youth. Data were collected as part of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study. Participants included 244 ethnoracial minoritized (predominantly Hispanic, Asian and Black) CHR-P youth and ethnoracial minoritized healthy controls. Among youth at CHR-P (n = 164), lower levels of EMD during childhood were associated with reduced CT in the right fusiform gyrus (adjusted β = 0.54; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.91) and right insula (adjusted β = 0.40; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.74). The associations between EMD and CT were significantly moderated by SE: among youth with lower SE (SE at or below the median, n = 122), lower levels of EMD were significantly associated with reduced right fusiform gyrus CT (adjusted β = 0.72; 95% CI 0.29 to 1.14) and reduced right insula CT (adjusted β = 0.57; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.97). However, among those with greater SE (n = 42), the associations between EMD and right insula and fusiform gyrus CT were not significant. We found evidence that lower levels of ethnic density during childhood were associated with reduced cortical thickness in regional brain regions, but this association may be buffered by greater levels of social engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Associations between childhood EMD and cortical thickness of ROIs selected a priori from The Stimulation Discrepancy Deprivation Model (n = 244).
Fig. 2

References

  1. Belleau EL, Treadway MT, Pizzagalli DA. The impact of stress and major depressive disorder on hippocampal and medial prefrontal cortex morphology. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;85:443–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanacora G, Yan Z, Popoli M. The stressed synapse 2.0: pathophysiological mechanisms in stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022;23:86–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lenart-Bugla M, Szcześniak D, Bugla B, et al. The association between allostatic load and brain: a systematic review. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022;145:105917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alleva E, Santucci D. Psychosocial vs. “physical” stress situations in rodents and humans. Physiol Behav. 2001;73:313–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sandi C, Haller J. Stress and the social brain: behavioural effects and neurobiological mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:290–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hodges T, McCormick C. Stress and social development in adolescence in a rodent model, in Routledge International Handbook of Social Neuroendocrinology. London, Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. p. 479–503.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patel D, Kas MJ, Chattarji S, et al. Rodent models of social stress and neuronal plasticity: relevance to depressive-like disorders. Behavioural Brain Research. 2019;369:111900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ulmer Yaniv A, Salomon R, Waidergoren S, et al. Synchronous caregiving from birth to adulthood tunes humans’ social brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:e2012900118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shaw GA, Dupree JL, Neigh GN: Adolescent maturation of the prefrontal cortex: Role of stress and sex in shaping adult risk for compromise [Internet]. Genes, Brain and Behavior 2020; 19 [cited 2023 Apr 5] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12626.

  10. Aberizk K, Collins MA, Addington J, et al. Life event stress and reduced cortical thickness in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis and healthy control subjects. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022;7:171–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. LoPilato AM, Goines K, Addington J, et al. Impact of childhood adversity on corticolimbic volumes in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2019;213:48–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Machlin L, Egger HL, Stein CR, et al. Distinct associations of deprivation and threat with alterations in brain structure in early childhood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023;S0890-8567(23):00061–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Copeland WE, Keeler G, Angold A, et al. Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress in childhood. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:577–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hatch SL, Dohrenwend BP. Distribution of traumatic and other stressful life events by race/ethnicity, gender, SES and age: a review of the research. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;40:313–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Muscatell KA, Alvarez GM, Bonar AS, et al. Brain–body pathways linking racism and health. American Psychologist. 2022;77:1049–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Faris REL, Dunham HW. Mental disorders in urban areas: an ecological study of schizophrenia and other psychoses. Oxford, England: Univ. Chicago Press; 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkbride JB, Errazuriz A, Croudace TJ, et al. Incidence of schizophrenia and other psychoses in England, 1950-2009: a systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bécares L, Dewey ME, Das-Munshi J. Ethnic density effects for adult mental health: systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies. Psychol Med. 2018;48:2054–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baker SJ, Jackson M, Jongsma H, et al. The ethnic density effect in psychosis: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2021;219:632–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Veling W. Ethnic minority position and risk for psychotic disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013;26:166–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Crush E, Arseneault L, Jaffee SR, et al. Protective factors for psychotic symptoms among poly-victimized children. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2018;44:691–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anglin DM, Ereshefsky S, Klaunig MJ, et al. From womb to neighborhood: a racial analysis of social determinants of psychosis in the United States. AJP. 2021;178:599–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Anglin DM, Espinosa A, Addington J, et al. Childhood Area-Level Ethnic Density in the U.S. and Psychosis Risk among Ethnoracial Minoritized Individuals in the NAPLS2 Cohort. JAMA Psychiatry. 2023; In press.

  24. Bécares L, Nazroo J, Stafford M. The buffering effects of ethnic density on experienced racism and health. Health Place. 2009;15:670–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Das-Munshi J, Becares L, Dewey ME, et al. Understanding the effect of ethnic density on mental health: multi-level investigation of survey data from England. BMJ. 2010;341:c5367.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Vargas T, Conley RE, Mittal VA. Chronic stress, structural exposures and neurobiological mechanisms: A stimulation, discrepancy and deprivation model of psychosis. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2020;152:41–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kearns A, Whitley E. Perceived neighborhood ethnic diversity and social outcomes: context-dependent effects within a postindustrial city undergoing regeneration. J Urban Aff. 2018;40:186–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Heinrichs M, Baumgartner T, Kirschbaum C, et al. Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:1389–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Norman GJ, Hawkley LC, Cole SW, et al. Social neuroscience: The social brain, oxytocin, and health. Social Neurosci. 2012;7:18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Petrovic P, Kalisch R, Singer T, et al. Oxytocin attenuates affective evaluations of conditioned faces and amygdala activity. J Neurosci. 2008;28:6607–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Petrovic P, Kalisch R, Pessiglione M, et al. Learning affective values for faces is expressed in amygdala and fusiform gyrus. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008;3:109–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Yao S, Zhao W, Geng Y, et al. Oxytocin facilitates approach behavior to positive social stimuli via decreasing anterior insula activity. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018;21:918–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen Y, Becker B, Zhang Y, et al. Oxytocin increases the pleasantness of affective touch and orbitofrontal cortex activity independent of valence. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020;39:99–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Li X-H, Matsuura T, Xue M, et al. Oxytocin in the anterior cingulate cortex attenuates neuropathic pain and emotional anxiety by inhibiting presynaptic long-term potentiation. Cell Reports. 2021;36:109411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Riem MME, Van IJzendoorn MH, Tops M, et al. Oxytocin effects on complex brain networks are moderated by experiences of maternal love withdrawal. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;23:1288–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Spitzer M, Fischbacher U, Herrnberger B, et al. The neural signature of social norm compliance. Neuron. 2007;56:185–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Adolphs R. The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:693–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Eisenberger NI. The neural bases of social pain: evidence for shared representations with physical pain. Psychosomatic Med. 2012;74:126–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pantelis C, Velakoulis D, McGorry PD, et al. Neuroanatomical abnormalities before and after onset of psychosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal MRI comparison. The Lancet. 2003;361:281–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Borgwardt S, Mcguire P, Aston J, et al. Reductions in frontal, temporal and parietal volume associated with the onset of psychosis. Schizophrenia Res. 2008;106:108–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fornito A, Yung AR, Wood SJ, et al. Anatomic abnormalities of the anterior cingulate cortex before psychosis onset: an MRI study of ultra-high-risk individuals. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;64:758–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sun D, Phillips L, Velakoulis D, et al. Progressive brain structural changes mapped as psychosis develops in ‘at risk’ individuals. Schizophrenia Res. 2009;108:85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Takahashi T, Wood SJ, Yung AR, et al. Progressive gray matter reduction of the superior temporal gyrus during transition to psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jung WH, Kim JS, Jang JH, et al. Cortical thickness reduction in individuals at ultra-high-risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia Bull. 2011;37:839–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ziermans TB, Schothorst PF, Schnack HG, et al. Progressive structural brain changes during development of psychosis. Schizophrenia Bull. 2012;38:519–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cannon TD, Chung Y, He G, Sun D, Jacobson A, van Erp TGM, et al. Progressive reduction in cortical thickness as psychosis develops: a multisite longitudinal neuroimaging study of youth at elevated clinical risk. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77:147–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Collins MA, Ji JL, Chung Y, et al.: Accelerated cortical thinning precedes and predicts conversion to psychosis: The NAPLS3 longitudinal study of youth at clinical high-risk [Internet]. Mol Psychiatry 2022; [cited 2023 Mar 10] Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-022-01870-7.

  48. Del ReEC, Stone WS, Bouix S, et al. Baseline cortical thickness reductions in clinical high risk for psychosis: brain regions associated with conversion to psychosis versus non-conversion as assessed at one-year follow-up in the Shanghai-at-risk-for-psychosis (SHARP) study. Schizophr Bull. 2021;47:562–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shell AM, Peek MK, Eschbach K. Neighborhood Hispanic composition and depressive symptoms among Mexican-descent residents of Texas City, Texas. Soc Sci Med. 2013;99:56–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ku BS, Aberizk K, Addington J, et al. The association between neighborhood poverty and hippocampal volume among individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: the moderating role of social engagement. Schizophr Bull. 2022;48:1032–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Toga AW, Thompson PM. Mapping brain asymmetry. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:37–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Taylor RL, Cooper SR, Jackson JJ, et al. Assessment of neighborhood poverty, cognitive function, and prefrontal and hippocampal volumes in children. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2023774.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ku BS, Addington J, Bearden CE, et al. The associations between area-level residential instability and gray matter volumes from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS) consortium. Schizophr Res. 2022;241:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Esteves M, Ganz E, Sousa N, et al. Asymmetrical brain plasticity: physiology and pathology. Neuroscience. 2021;454:3–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. McGlashan T, Walsh B, Woods S: The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome: Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-Up [Internet]. Oxford University Press, 2010. Available from https://books.google.com/books?id=FXM\_utb3D8EC.

  56. Addington J, Cadenhead KS, Cornblatt BA, et al. North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 2): Overview and recruitment. Schizophrenia Research. 2012;142:77–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Addington J, Piskulic D, Liu L, et al. Comorbid diagnoses for youth at clinical high risk of psychosis. Schizophrenia Research. 2017;190:90–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. NIMH Genetics Initiative. Family Interview for Genetic Studies. Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Georgopoulos G, Stowkowy J, Liu L, et al. The role of a family history of psychosis for youth at clinical high risk of psychosis. Early Intervent Psychiatry. 2019;13:251–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. US Cities Database [Internet]. Simple Maps Available from: Simplemaps.Com.

  61. Selected housing characteristics, 1995–2000 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. US Census Bureau, 2002.

  62. Bécares L, Shaw R, Nazroo J, et al. Ethnic density effects on physical morbidity, mortality, and health behaviors: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:e33–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Nagendra A, Halverson TF, Pinkham AE, et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and racial disparities in schizophrenia: An exploration of domains of functioning. Schizophrenia Res. 2020;224:95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Karcher NR, Schiffman J, Barch DM. Environmental risk factors and psychotic-like experiences in children aged 9–10. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021;60:490–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Falcón LM, Todorova I, Tucker K. Social support, life events, and psychological distress among the Puerto Rican population in the Boston area of the United States. Aging Mental Health. 2009;13:863–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Rodríguez-Galán MB, Falcón LM. Patterns of Social Activity Engagement Among Older Hispanics and Their Relationship to Sociodemographic and Health Variables. Activit Adapt Aging. 2010;34:251–75.

    Google Scholar 

  67. MRI Acquisition [Internet]. ADNI 2021; Available from: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/methods/mri-tool/mri-analysis/.

  68. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis. NeuroImage. 1999;9:179–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Fischl B. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex. 2004;14:11–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage. 2006;31:968–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Finney N, Jivraj S. Ethnic group population change and neighbourhood belonging. Urban Stud. 2013;50:3323–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Bécares L, Cormack D, Harris R. Ethnic density and area deprivation: neighbourhood effects on Māori health and racial discrimination in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Soc Sci Med. 2013;88:76–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Bach P, Frischknecht U, Bungert M, et al. Effects of social exclusion and physical pain in chronic opioid maintenance treatment: fMRI correlates. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;29:291–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Mwilambwe-Tshilobo L, Spreng RN. Social exclusion reliably engages the default network: a meta-analysis of Cyberball. Neuroimage. 2021;227:117666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Putcha D, Brickhouse M, O’Keefe K, et al. Hippocampal hyperactivation associated with cortical thinning in Alzheimer’s disease signature regions in non-demented elderly adults. J Neurosci. 2011;31:17680–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Hull R, Vaid J. Bilingual language lateralization: A meta-analytic tale of two hemispheres*. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45:1987–2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Keenan JP, Thangaraj V, Halpern AR, et al. Absolute pitch and planum temporale. Neuroimage. 2001;14:1402–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Platek SM, Wathne K, Tierney NG, et al. Neural correlates of self-face recognition: an effect-location meta-analysis. Brain Research. 2008;1232:173–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Jung S, Kim J-H, Kang N-O, et al. Fusiform gyrus volume reduction associated with impaired facial expressed emotion recognition and emotional intensity recognition in patients with schizophrenia spectrum psychosis. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2021;307:111226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. O’Doherty J, Winston J, Critchley H, et al. Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:147–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Singer T, Seymour B, O’Doherty J, et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science. 2004;303:1157–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Van Bavel JJ, Packer DJ, Cunningham WA. The neural substrates of in-group bias: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Psychol Sci. 2008;19:1131–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Van Bavel JJ, Packer DJ, Cunningham WA. Modulation of the fusiform face area following minimal exposure to motivationally relevant faces: evidence of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard). J Cognit Neurosci. 2011;23:3343–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Marsh LE, de C Hamilton AF. Dissociation of mirroring and mentalising systems in autism. NeuroImage. 2011;56:1511–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Farrow TFD, Jones SC, Kaylor-Hughes CJ, et al. Higher or lower? The functional anatomy of perceived allocentric social hierarchies. NeuroImage. 2011;57:1552–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Rilling JK, Goldsmith DR, Glenn AL, et al. The neural correlates of the affective response to unreciprocated cooperation. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46:1256–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Zink CF, Tong Y, Chen Q, et al. Know your place: neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron. 2008;58:273–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Augustine J. Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Res Rev. 1996;22:229–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Iacoboni M, Dapretto M. The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:942–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Bud Craig AD. How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Critchley HD, Wiens S, Rotshtein P, et al. Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:189–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Phelps EA, O’Connor KJ, Cunningham WA, et al. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. J Cognit Neurosci. 2000;12:729–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Richeson JA, Baird AA, Gordon HL, et al. An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:1323–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Richeson JA, Todd AR, Trawalter S, et al. Eye-gaze direction modulates race-related amygdala activity. Group Processes Intergroup Relat. 2008;11:233–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Kaplan JT, Aziz-Zadeh L, Uddin LQ, et al. The self across the senses: an fMRI study of self-face and self-voice recognition. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci. 2008;3:218–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Falk EB, Spunt RP, Lieberman MD. Ascribing beliefs to ingroup and outgroup political candidates: neural correlates of perspective-taking, issue importance and days until the election. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012;367:731–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Ida Gobbini M, Leibenluft E, Santiago N, et al. Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces. NeuroImage. 2004;22:1628–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Chiao JY, Adams RB, Tse PU, et al. Knowing Who’s Boss: fMRI and ERP Investigations of Social Dominance Perception. Group Processes Intergroup Relat. 2008;11:201–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. McEwen BS, Morrison JH. The brain on stress: vulnerability and plasticity of the prefrontal cortex over the life course. Neuron. 2013;79:16–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Smieskova R, Fusar-Poli P, Aston J, et al. Insular volume abnormalities associated with different transition probabilities to psychosis. Psychol Med. 2012;42:1613–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. ENIGMA Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Working Group, Jalbrzikowski M, Hayes RA, et al. Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis: An ENIGMA Working Group Mega-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78:753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Bhugra D, Becker MA. Migration, cultural bereavement and cultural identity. World Psychiatry. 2005;4:18–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Ku BS, Addington J, Bearden CE, et al. Associations Between Childhood Area-Level Social Fragmentation Maladaptation to School and Social Functioning Among Healthy Youth and Those at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2023; In press.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grants U01 MH081902 to TDC, P50 MH066286 to CEB, U01 MH081857 to BAC, U01 MH82022 to SWW, U01 MH066134 to JA, U01 MH081944 to KSC, R01 U01 MH066069 to DOP, R01 MH076989 to DHM, U01 MH081988 to EFW, and K23 MH129684 to BSK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: BK, JA, CB, KC, TC, BC, BD, MK, DM, DP, WS, MT, SW, EW; data collection: BK, JA, CB, KC, TC, BC, MK, DM, DP, WS, MT, SW, EW; analysis and interpretation of results: BK, MC, DA, AD; draft manuscript preparation: BK, MC, DA, AD, BD, EW; or revise critically for important intellectual content: JA, CB, KC, TC, BC, MK, DM, DP, WS, MT, SW. All authors reviewed the results, approved the final version of the manuscript, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benson S. Ku.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

TDC has served as a consultant for Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals and Lundbeck A/S. DHM has served as a consultant for Aptinyx, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Cadent Therapeutics, and Greenwich Biosciences. DOP has served as a consultant for Sunovion and Alkermes, has received research support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, and has received royalties from American Psychiatric Association Publishing. SWW has received investigator-initiated research support from Pfizer and sponsor-initiated research support from Auspex and Teva; he has served as a consultant for Biomedisyn (unpaid), Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Merck and as an unpaid consultant to DSM-5; he has been granted a patent for a method of treating prodromal schizophrenia with glycine; and he has received royalties from Oxford University Press. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ku, B.S., Collins, M., Anglin, D.M. et al. Associations between childhood ethnoracial minority density, cortical thickness, and social engagement among minority youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis. Neuropsychopharmacol. 48, 1707–1715 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01649-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01649-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links