Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Techniques and Methods

Edograms: recording the microstructure of meal intake in humans—a window on appetite mechanisms

International Journal of Obesity volume 44, pages 2347–2357 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

This article has been updated

Abstract

Early attempts at the objective measurement of food intake in humans followed many heuristic pioneer studies in laboratory animals, which revealed how homeostatic and hedonic factors interact to shape the daily eating patterns. Early studies in humans examined the characteristics of intake responses at discrete ingestive events. Described for the first time in 1969, the edogram consisted of a parallel recording of chewing and swallowing responses during standardized lunches, allowing parameters of the “microstructure of meals” to be quantified under varying conditions of deprivation or sensory stimulation, in parallel with overall meal size, meal duration, and eating rate. Edographic studies showed consistent changes in the microstructure of meals in response to palatability level (increased eating rate, decreased chewing time and number of chews per food unit, shorter intrameal pauses, and increased prandial drinking under improved palatability). Longer premeal deprivation affected the eating responses at the beginning of meals (decreased chewing time and number of chews per food unit) but not at the end. Eating rate decelerated during the course of meals in normal-weight participants but not in participants with obesity. These observations largely agreed with contemporary works using other objective measurement methods. They were confirmed and expanded in later studies, notably in the investigation of satiation mechanisms affecting weight control. Importantly, research has demonstrated that the parameters of the microstructure of meals not only reflect the influence of stimulatory/inhibitory factors but can, per se, exert a causal role in satiation and satiety. The early edographic recording instruments were improved over the years and taken out of laboratory settings in order to address the measurement of spontaneous intake responses in free-living individuals. Much remains to be done to make these instruments entirely reliable under the immense variety of situations where food consumption occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The edogram is a simultaneous recording of chewing and swallowing activity during the intake of standardized food units.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 30 August 2020

    This article was amended to correct a typesetting error in Figure 1.

References

  1. Bellisle F. Food intake and physiological regulation: the means and the end. In: Meiselman HL, editor. Handbook of eating and drinking. Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75388-1_128-1.

  2. WHO. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.

  3. Butland B, Jebb S, Kopelman P, McPherson K, Thomas S, Mardell J, et al. Foresight. Tackling obesities: future choices. Project report. London: Government Office for Science; 2007.

  4. De Castro JM. The control of food intake of free-living humans: putting the pieces back together. Physiol Behav. 2010;100:446–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramsay DS, Woods SC. Physiological regulation: how it really works. Cell Metab. 2016;24:361–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Berthoud HR. 70th anniversary: body weight regulation—food, gut and brain signaling. Plenary lecture II. The neurobiology of food intake in an obesogenic environment. Proc Nutr Soc. 2012;71:478–87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Blundell JE, Rogers PJ, Hill AJ. Evaluation of the satiating power of foods: implications for acceptance and consumption. In: Solms J, Booth DA, Pangbourne RM, Raunhardt O, editors. Food acceptance and nutrition. London: Academic Press; 1987. p. 205–19.

  8. Blundell JE, de Graaf K, Hulshof T, Jebb S, Livingstone B, Lluch A, et al. Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of food. Obes Rev. 2010;11:251–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kant AK, Graubard BI. Secular trends in patterns of self-reported food consumption of adult Americans: NHANES 1971–1975 to 1999–2002. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:1215–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Herz M. Einige Bemerkungen über das saugen der Kinder. Jahrbuch Kinderh. 1865;7:46.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kron RE, Stein M, Goddard KA. A method of measuring sucking behavior of newborn infants. Psychosom Med. 1963;25:181–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hashim SA, Van Itallie TB. An automatically monitored food dispensing apparatus for the study of food intake in man. Fed Proc. 1964;23:82–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hashim SA, Van Itallie TB. Studies in normal and obese subjects with a monitored food dispensing device. N Y Acad Sci. 1965;131:654–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jordan HA, Wieland WF, Zebley SP, Stellar E, Stunkard AJ. Direct measurement of food intake in man: a method for the objective study of eating behavior. Psychosom Med. 1966;28:836–42.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pudel V. Food-dispenser: eine methode zur untersuchung des spontanen appetitverhaltens. Zeitschrift fur Ernahrungswissenschaft. 1971;10:382–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer JE, Pudel V. Experimental studies on food intake in obese and normal weight subjects. Psychosom Res. 1972;16:305–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kissileff HR, Klingsberg G, Van Itallie TB. Universal eating monitor for continuous recording of solid or liquid consumption in man. Am J Physiol. 1980;238:R14–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guss JL, Kissileff HR. Microstructural analysis of human ingestive patterns: from description to mechanistic hypotheses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000;24:261–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pierson A, Le Magnen J. Quantitative study of the process of regulation of feeding responses in man. Physiol Behav. 1969;4:61–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pierson A, Le Magnen J. Study of food textures by recording of chewing and swallowing movements. J Texture Stud. 1970;1:327–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bellisle F, Le Magnen J. The analysis of human feeding patterns: the edogram. Appetite. 1980;1:141–50.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bellisle F, Le Magnen J. The structure of meals in humans: eating and drinking patterns in lean and obese subjects. Physiol Behav. 1981;27:649–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bellisle F, Lucas F, Amrani R, Le Magnen J. Deprivation, palatability and the micro-structure of meals in human subjects. Appetite. 1984;5:85–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Castro JM. A microregulatory analysis of spontaneous fluid intake by humans: evidence that the amount of liquid ingested and its timing is mainly governed by feeding. Physiol Behav. 1988;43:705–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McKiernan F, Houchins JA, Mattes RD. Relationships between human thirst, hunger, drinking, and feeding. Physiol Behav. 2008;94:700–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Spiegel TA, Shrager EE, Stellar E. Responses of lean and obese subjects to preloads, deprivation, and palatability. Appetite. 1989;13:45–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kissileff HR, Thornton J, Becker E. A quadratic equation describes the cumulative food intake curve in man. Appetite. 1982;3:255–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bobroff EM, Kissileff HR. Effects of change in palatability on food intake and the cumulative food intake curve in man. Appetite. 1986;6:85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yeomans MR, Gray RW, Mitchell CJ, True S. Independent effects of palatability and within-meal pauses on intake and appetite ratings in human volunteers. Appetite. 1997;29:61–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Laessle RG, Lehrke SL, Dückers S. Laboratory eating behavior in obesity. Appetite. 2007;49:399–404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. de Wijk RA, Zijlstra N, Mars M, de Graaf C, Prinz JF. The effects of food viscosity on bite size, bite effort and food intake. Physiol Behav. 2008;95:527–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bolhuis DP, Forde CG, Cheng Y, Hu H, Martin N, de Graaf C. Slow food: sustained impact of harder foods on the reduction of energy intake over the course of the day. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e93370.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bolhuis DP, Lakemond CM, de Wijk RA, Luning PA, de Graaf C. Both a higher number of sips and a longer oral transit time reduce ad libitum intake. Food Qual Prefer. 2014;32:234–40.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Forde CG, van Kuijk N, Thaler T, de Graaf C, Martin N. Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation. Appetite. 2013;60:208–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ioakimidis I, Zandian M, Eriksson-Marklund L, Bergh C, Grigoriadis A, Södersten P. Description of chewing and food intake over the course of a meal. Physiol Behav. 2011;104:761–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Robinson E, Almiron-Roig E, Rutters F, de Graaf C, Forde CG, Smith CT, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of eating rate on energy intake and hunger. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:123–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yarmolinsky DA, Zuker CS, Ryba NJ. Common sense about taste: from mammals to insects. Cell. 2009;139:234–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kokkinos A, le Roux CW, Alexiadou K, Tentolouris N, Vincent RP, Kyriaki D, et al. Eating slowly increases the postprandial response of the anorexigenic gut hormones, peptide YY and glucagon-like peptide-1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:333–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li J, Zhang N, Hu L, Li Z, Li R, Li C, et al. Improvement in chewing activity reduces energy intake in one meal and modulates plasma gut hormone concentrations in obese and lean young Chinese men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:709–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rolls BJ, Rolls ET, Rowe EA. Sensory specific satiety in man. Psysiol Behav. 1981;27:137–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hetherington M, Havermans RC. Sensory-specific satiation and satiey. In: Blundell JE, Bellisle F, editors. Satiation, satiety and the control of food intake. Oxford: Woodhead Publishing Ltd; 2013. p. 253–69.

  42. Ferriday D, Bosworth ML, Lai S, Godinot N, Martin N, Martin AA, et al. Effects of eating rate on satiety: a role for episodic memory? Physiol Behav. 2015;152:389–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu Y, Hollis JH. Increasing the number of chews before swallowing reduces meal size in normal-weight, overweight, and obese adults. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114:926–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Smit HJ, Kemsley EK, Tapp HS, Henry CJK. Does prolonged chewing reduce food intake? Fletcherism revisited. Appetite. 2011;57:295–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Higgs S, Jones A. Prolonged chewing at lunch decreases later snack intake. Appetite. 2013;62:91–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zandian M, Ioakimidis I, Bergh C, Brodin U, Södersten P. Decelerated and linear eaters: effect of eating rate of food intake and satiety. Physiol Behav. 2009;96:270–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Spiegel TA, Kaplan JM, Tomassini A, Stellar E. Bite size, ingestion rate, and meal size in lean and obese women. Appetite. 1993;21:131–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zijlstra N, de Wijk RA, Mars M, Stafleu A, de Graaf C. Effect of bite size and oral processing time of a semisolid food on satiation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90:269–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Krop EM, Hetherington MM, Nekitsing C, Miquel S, Postelnicu L, Sarkar A. Influence of oral processing on appetite and food intake—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Appetite. 2018;125:253–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kissileff HR, Zimmerli EJ, Torres MI, Devlin MJ, Walsh BT. Effect of eating rate on binge size in bulimia nervosa. Physiol Behav. 2008;93:481–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ford AL, Bergh C, Södersten P, Sabin MA, Hollinghurst S, Hunt LP, et al. Treatment of childhood obesity by retraining eating behaviour: randomized controlled trial. Br Med J. 2010;340:b5388.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Faith MS, Dievald LK, Crabbe S, Burgess B, Berkowitz RI. Reduced eating pace (RePace) behavioral intervention for children prone to or with obesity: does the turtle win the race? Obesity. 2019;27:121–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hawton K, Ferriday D, Rogers P, Toner P, Brooks J, Holly J, et al. Slow down: behavioural and physiological effects of reducing eating rate. Nutrients. 2019;11:50. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu1010050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Blundell JE. Making claims: functional foods for managing appetite and weight. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010;6:53–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Devezeaux de Lavergne M, Derks JAM, Ketel EC, de Wijk RA, Stieger M. Eating behaviour explains differences between individuals in dynamic texture perception of sausages. Food Qual Prefer. 2015;41:189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ohkuma T, Hirakawa Y, Nakamura U, Kiyohara Y, Kitazono T, Ninomiya T. Association between eating rate and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2015;39:1589–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Woods SC. Metabolic signals and food intake. Forty years of progress. Appetite. 2013;71:440–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Woods SC. The control of food intake: behavioral versus molecular perspectives. Cell. 2013;9:489–98.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mattfeld RS, Muth ER, Hoover A. A comparison of bite size and BMI in a cafeteria setting. Physiol Behav. 2017;181:38–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Weijzen PLG, Smeets PAM, de Graaf C. Sip-size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation. Br J Nutr. 2009;102:1091–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hermsen S, Mars M, Higgs S, Frost JH, Hermans RCJ. Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body weight: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16:90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0857-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Bellisle F. The value of studying laboratory meals. In: Meiselman HL, editor. Context: the effects of environment on product design and evaluation. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier; 2019. p. 209–25.

  63. Kim JY, Kissileff HR. The effect of social setting on response to a preloading manipulation in non-obese women and men. Appetite. 1996;27:25–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Meiselman HL. Obstacles to studying real people eating real meals in real situations. Appetite. 1992;19:84–6.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Stellar E, Shrager EE. Chews and swallows and the micro-structure of eating. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985;42:973–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Mattfeld RS, Muth ER, Hoover A. Measuring the consumption of individual solid and liquid bites using a table embedded scale during unrestricted eating. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017;21:1711–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2016.2632621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Fontana JM, Higgins JA, Schuckers SC, Bellisle F, Pan Z, Melanson EL, et al. Energy intake estimation from counts of chews and swallows. Appetite. 2014;85:14–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Higgs S, Woodward M. Television watching during lunch increases afternoon snack intake of young women. Appetite. 2009;52:39–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ellithorpe ME, Eden A, Hahn L, Ulusoy E, Yang CL, Tucker RM. Meal-concurrent media use is associated with increased dietary intake with no evidence of next meal compensation in free-living adults. Obesity. 2019;27:1418–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Gonçalves RFM, Barreto DA, Monteiro PI, Zangeronimo MG, Castelo PM, van der Bilt A, et al. Smartphone use while eating increases caloric ingestion. Physiol Behav. 2019;204:93–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kahneman D, Schkade DA, Fischler C, Krueger AB, Krilla A. The structure of well-being in two cities: life satisfaction and experienced happiness in Columbus, Ohio and Rennes, France. In: Diener E, Helliwell JF, Kahneman D, editors. International differences in well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 16–33.

  72. Bellisle F. Cultural resistance to an obesogenic world: infrequently examined differences in lifestyle between France and America. Nutr Today. 2017;52:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Le Magnen J. Neurobiology of feeding and nutrition. San Diego: Academic Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Woods SC, May-Zhang AA, Begg DP. How and why do gastrointestinal peptides influence food intake? Physiol Behav. 2018;193:218–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Rosembaum M, Sy M, Pavlovitch K, Leibel RL, Hirsch J. Leptin reverses weight loss-induced changes in regional neural activity responses to visual food stimuli. J Clin Investig. 2008;118:2583–91.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Hoebel BG, Teitelbaum P. Hypothalamic control of feeding and self-stimulation. Science. 1966;149:452–3.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Martin CK, Correa BJ, Han H, Allen HR, Rood JC, Champagne CM, et al. Validity of the remote food photography method (RFPM) for estimating energy and nutrient intake in near real-time. Obesity. 2012;20:891–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Ptomey LT, Willis EA, Honas JJ, Mayo MS, Washburn RA, Herrmann SD, et al. Validity of energy intake estimated by digital photography plus recall in overweight and obese young adults. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115:1392–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Blundell JE, Gibbons C, Beaulieu K, Casanova N, Duarte C, Finlayson G, et al. The drive to eat in homo sapiens: energy expenditure drives energy intake. Physiol Behav. 2020;219:112846.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Sclafani A. From appetite set point to appetition: 50 years of ingestive behavior research. Physiol Behav. 2018;192:210–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nutritional Epidemiology Team (EREN), Université Paris 13, INSERM U1153, INRA U1125, CNAM, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, F-93017, Bobigny, France

    France Bellisle

Authors
  1. France Bellisle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to France Bellisle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bellisle, F. Edograms: recording the microstructure of meal intake in humans—a window on appetite mechanisms. Int J Obes 44, 2347–2357 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-00653-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-00653-w

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links