Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Chronic kidney disease

Automated eGFR reporting: good for the patient?

The automated reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate has increased the number of patients being referred to nephrologists, but is chronic kidney disease being incorrectly diagnosed in individuals who have normal serum creatinine levels?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Age- and sex-standardized number of new nephrologist consults in Ontario, Canada, from January 2003 through September 2007.

References

  1. Jain, A. K. et al. When laboratories report estimated glomerular filtration rates in addition to serum creatinines, nephrology consults increase. Kidney Int. 76, 318–323 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Noble, E. et al. The impact of automated eGFR reporting and education on nephrology service referrals. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 23, 3845–3850 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Plantinga, L. C. et al. Patient awareness of chronic kidney disease: trends and predictors. Arch. Intern. Med. 168, 2268–2275 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. den Hartog, J. R., Reese, P. P., Cizman, B. & Feldman, H. I. The costs and benefits of automatic estimated glomerular filtration rate reporting. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4, 419–427 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Israni, R. K., Shea, J. A., Joffe, M. M. & Feldman, H. I. Physician characteristics and knowledge of CKD management. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 54, 238–247 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O'Hare, A. M. et al. Mortality risk stratification in chronic kidney disease: one size for all ages? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17, 846–853 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rule, A. D. et al. Measured and estimated GFR in healthy potential kidney donors. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 43, 112–119 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rule, A. D. et al. Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 141, 929–937 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rule, A. D. et al. For estimating creatinine clearance measuring muscle mass gives better results than those based on demographics. Kidney Int. 75, 1071–1078 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brantsma, A. H. et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcome in subjects with K/DOQI stage 1–3 chronic kidney disease: the importance of urinary albumin excretion. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 23, 3851–3858 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew D. Rule.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rule, A., Hickson, L. Automated eGFR reporting: good for the patient?. Nat Rev Nephrol 5, 673–675 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2009.174

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2009.174

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing