Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Science and Society
  • Published:

Scientific R&D: time to revise the rules?

Abstract

For several decades scientific R&D has been failing communities around the world, especially in developing countries, by not producing an adequate level of benefits (for example, improved health and living standards) and essential public goods (for example, the provision of safe water, sanitation and energy). It is time for a complete overhaul of the R&D process, with a comprehensive review of the mechanisms by which R&D is financed, how and where the work and results are published and disseminated, how the results and knowledge are exploited, and how ownership is decided. This is particularly important for public goods, for which there is often no market or prospect of commercial return or profit.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Top R&D spenders.
Figure 2: Sources of funding for R&D in the United States.
Figure 3: Industry R&D expenditure 1991–2001.
Figure 4: Government R&D expenditure 1991–2001.
Figure 5: R&D funding from overseas.

References

  1. OECD. Science, Technology and Innovation for the 21st Century. Meeting of the OECD Committee for Scientific & Technological Policy – Final Communique. [online], (2004).

  2. Preamble article 5. Declaration on science and the use of scientific knowledge. World Conference on Science. [online], (1999).

  3. van Tulder, R. Who holds the reins of power in the global economy? The power of core companies. European Business Forum Debate. [online], (2003).

  4. UNDP. Human Development Report. [online], (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).

  5. Mayor, F. Science for the 21st Century: a new commitment. [online], (UNESCO Office of Public Information, 1999).

  6. UNESCO. World Science Report. (ed. Moore, H.) (Elsevier, UK, 1998).

  7. Armbrecht, F. M. R. Jr. R&D and innovation in industry. AAAS Report XXVIII: research and development [online], (2004).

  8. OECD; Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2003. [online], (2003).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links

FURTHER INFORMATION

World Science Conference Framework for Action

OECD

UNESCO

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crump, A. Scientific R&D: time to revise the rules?. Nat Rev Microbiol 2, 914–919 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1026

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1026

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing