Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Advances in imaging for urologic procedures

Abstract

Improvements in imaging and device engineering have led to the rapid development of advanced, minimally invasive techniques in urologic care. While imaging advances have had a major effect in the areas of diagnosis, surgical planning and therapeutic assessment, the focus of this Review is on developments in intraoperative imaging that are currently making an impact in urology and are likely to provide additional opportunities to urologists in the years to come. While previous image-guided urologic procedures have mostly utilized two-dimensional X-ray images, it is expected that new technologies will involve the use of three- and four-dimensional multi-modality imaging, molecular imaging, and robot-assisted image-guidance techniques. Application of these procedures will bring together the complementary disciplines of endourology and interventional radiology in the development of multidisciplinary, cooperative approaches to providing optimal treatments and outcomes for urologic disease.

Key Points

  • Advances in imaging are having an increasing role in guiding procedures and operations in urologic diseases

  • New rotational fluoroscopy with fluoroscopic C-arms can create CT-like images to guide procedures

  • Endoscopic ultrasonography, ultrasound contrast agents and 4D imaging can improve visualization to help guide therapies

  • Real-time CT imaging offers 'live' CT to guide procedures

  • Thermal monitoring with MRI can provide feedback for thermal ablation procedures

  • Molecular imaging will provide more specific and physiologic information to guide procedures

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A rotational fluoroscopy image of a hepatic artery injection
Figure 2: Fusion of previously acquired prostate MR and live endorectal ultrasound images during an ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hellawell GO et al. (2005) Radiation exposure and the urologist: what are the risks? J Urol 174: 948–952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Valentin J (2000) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 30: 7–67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yusuf TE et al. (2006) International survey of knowledge of indications for EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 63: 107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kondabolu S et al. (2004) The role of endoluminal ultrasonography in urology: current perspectives. Int Braz J Urol 30: 96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horiuchi K et al. (2000) High-frequency endoluminal ultrasonography for staging transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Urology 56: 404–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saga Y et al. (2004) Comparative study of novel endoluminal ultrasonography and conventional transurethral ultrasonography in staging of bladder cancer. Int J Urol 11: 597–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitterberger M et al. (2006) Dynamic transurethral sonography and 3-dimensional reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter and urethra: initial experience in continent and incontinent women. J Ultrasound Med 25: 315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolecki R and Schirmer B (1998) Intraoperative and laparoscopic ultrasound. Surg Clin North Am 78: 251–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilbert BR et al. (1988) Intraoperative sonography: application in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 139: 582–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell SC et al. (1996) Intraoperative evaluation of renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study of the role of ultrasonography and histopathological frozen sections. J Urol 155: 1191–1195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Choyke PL et al. (2001) Intraoperative ultrasound during renal parenchymal sparing surgery for hereditary renal cancers: a 10-year experience. J Urol 165: 397–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ukimura O et al. (2006) Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: impact on surgical margins. J Urol 175: 1304–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lees W (2001) Ultrasound imaging in three and four dimensions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 22: 85–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Claudon M et al. (2002) Advances in ultrasound. Eur Radiol 12: 7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitterberger M et al. (2007) Three-dimensional ultrasonography of the urinary bladder: preliminary experience of assessment in patients with haematuria. BJU Int 99: 111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dolkart L et al. (2005) Four-dimensional ultrasonographic guidance for invasive obstetric procedures. J Ultrasound Med 24: 1261–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson DB et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation of radiofrequency ablation of the kidney: reliable imaging of the thermolesion. J Endourol 19: 248–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Halpern EJ et al. (2005) Detection of prostate carcinoma with contrast-enhanced sonography using intermittent harmonic imaging. Cancer 104: 2373–2383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pelzer A et al. (2005) Prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 4 to 10 ng/ml using a combined approach of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted and systematic biopsy. J Urol 173: 1926–1929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haag P et al. (2006) Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound to deliver an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide targeting the human androgen receptor into prostate tumours. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 102: 103–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Daly B and Templeton PA (1999) Real-time CT fluoroscopy: evolution of an interventional tool. Radiology 211: 309–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Keat N (2001) Real-time CT and CT fluoroscopy. Br J Radiol 74: 1088–1090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Katada K et al. (1996) Guidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experience. Radiology 200: 851–856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Heck SL et al. (2006) Accuracy and complications in computed tomography fluoroscopy-guided needle biopsies of lung masses. Eur Radiol 16: 1387–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Daly B et al. (1999) Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT fluoroscopy guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173: 637–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta A et al. (2006) Computerized tomography guided percutaneous renal cryoablation with the patient under conscious sedation: initial clinical experience. J Urol 175: 447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Silverman SG et al. (1999) CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology 212: 673–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nazarian S et al. (2006) Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla. Circulation 114: 1277–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chan DY et al. (2001) Image-guided therapy in urology. J Endourol 15: 105–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rickers C et al. (2005) Cardiovascular interventional MR imaging: a new road for therapy and repair in the heart. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13: 465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hama Y et al. (2007) MR lymphangiography using dendrimer-based contrast agents: a comparison at 1.5 T and 3.0T. Magn Reson Med 57: 431–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Silverman SG et al. (2005) Renal tumors: MR imaging-guided percutaneous cryotherapy–initial experience in 23 patients. Radiology 236: 716–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Denis de Senneville B et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance temperature imaging. Int J Hyperthermia 21: 515–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Germain D et al. (2001) MR monitoring of tumour therapy. MAGMA 13: 47–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Krieger A et al. (2005) Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52: 306–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Muntener M et al. (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging compatible robotic system for fully automated brachytherapy seed placement. Urology 68: 1313–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Anastasiadis AG et al. (2006) MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol 50: 738–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Barnes AS et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy-guided transperineal prostate biopsy and brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer. Urology 66: 1319

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ménard C et al. (2005) An interventional magnetic resonance imaging technique for the molecular characterization of intraprostatic dynamic contrast enhancement. Mol Imaging 4: 63–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Susil RC et al. (2006) Transrectal prostate biopsy and fiducial marker placement in a standard 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. J Urol 175: 113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schöder H and Larson SM (2004) Positron emission tomography for prostate, bladder, and renal cancer. Semin Nucl Med 34: 274–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Li G et al. (2006) The use of MN/CA9 gene expression in identifying malignant solid renal tumors. Eur Urol 49: 401–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Atkins M et al. (2005) Carbonic anhydrase IX expression predicts outcome of interleukin 2 therapy for renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11: 3714–3721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Solomon SB (1999) Interactive images in the operating room. J Endourol 13: 471–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen B Solomon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Stephen B Solomon has received grant/research support from General Electric.

Jonathan Coleman and Rodrigo Nascimento declared no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, J., Nascimento, R. & Solomon, S. Advances in imaging for urologic procedures. Nat Rev Urol 4, 498–504 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0883

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0883

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing