The accusation that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has produced a report that is biased by a conflict of interest is unfounded.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Teske, S., et al. Energy Efficiency 4, 409–433 (2010).
IPCC Review of the IPCC Processes and Procedures: Task Group on Conflict of Interest Policy – Background Paper IPCC-XXXIII/Doc. 11, Add.1. (IPCC, 2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edenhofer, O. Different views ensure IPCC balance. Nature Clim Change 1, 229–230 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1178
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1178
This article is cited by
-
Marginalization of end-use technologies in energy innovation for climate protection
Nature Climate Change (2012)