Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

A novel biopsy method to increase yield of subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue

Abstract

Collection of abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) for research testing is traditionally performed using punch biopsy or needle aspiration techniques, yielding small amounts of very superficial SAT (100–500 mg). Although liposuction techniques can be used to obtain large amounts of SAT, these approaches can compromise the integrity of the adipose tissue. Therefore, we investigated a novel method using a 6-mm Bergström side-cutting biopsy needle to acquire suitable amounts of intact abdominal SAT for multiple complex studies such as flow cytometry, RNA extraction, ex vivo expression of molecular and post-translational protein mediators, and histology. Fifty biopsies were obtained from 29 participants using a Bergström biopsy needle, applying transient manual suction and shearing large pieces of fat within the inner-cutting trochar. Eighteen of the biopsies were performed under ultrasound guidance, whereby we successfully sampled deep SAT (dSAT) from below Scarpa’s fascia. The average weight of SAT sampled was 1.5±0.4 g. There was no clinically important bleeding or ecchymosis on the abdominal wall and no infection occurred with this procedure. The 6-mm Bergström biopsy needle yielded substantially more SAT than what has been obtained from superficial procedures and, for the first time, allowed sampling of dSAT by a percutaneous approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Pou KM, Maurovich-Horvat P, Liu C-Y et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2007; 116: 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodpaster B, Thaete F, Simoneau J, Kelley D . Subcutaneous abdominal fat and thigh muscle composition predict insulin sensitivity independently of visceral fat. Diabetes 1997; 46: 1579–1585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel P, Abate N . Body fat distribution and insulin resistance. Nutrients 2013; 5: 2019–2027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelley DE, Thaete FL, Troost F, Huwe T, Goodpaster BH . Subdivisions of subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2011; 278: E941–E948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker GE, Verti B, Marzullo P, Savia G, Mencarelli M, Zurleni F et al. Deep subcutaneous adipose tissue: a distinct abdominal adipose depot. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007; 15: 1933–1943.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Item F, Konrad D . Visceral fat and metabolic inflammation: the portal theory revisited. Obes Rev 2012; 13: 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tchernof A, Després JP . Pathophysiology of human visceral obesity: an update. Physiol Rev 2013; 93: 359–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alvehus M, Burén J, Sjöström M, Goedecke J, Olsson T . The human visceral fat depot has a unique inflammatory profile. Obesity 2010; 18: 879–883.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tordjman J, Divoux A, Prifti E, Poitou C, Pelloux V, Hugol D et al. Structural and inflammatory heterogeneity in subcutaneous adipose tissue: relation with liver histopathology in morbid obesity. J Hepatol 2012; 56: 1152–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marinou K, Hodson L, Vasan SK, Fielding BA, Banerjee R, Brismar K et al. Structural and functional properties of deep abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue explain its association with insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk in men. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 821–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith SR, Lovejoy JC, Greenway F, Ryan D, deJonge L, la Bretonne de J et al. Contributions of total body fat, abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments, and visceral adipose tissue to the metabolic complications of obesity. Metab Clin Exp 2001; 50: 425–435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kolak M, Westerbacka J, Velagapudi VR, Wågsäter D, Yetukuri L, Makkonen J et al. Adipose tissue inflammation and increased ceramide content characterize subjects with high liver fat content independent of obesity. Diabetes 2007; 56: 1960–1968.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bigornia SJ, Farb MG, Mott MM, Hess DT, Carmine B, Fiscale A et al. Relation of depot-specific adipose inflammation to insulin resistance in human obesity. Nutr Diabetes 2012; 2: e30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lê K-A, Mahurkar S, Alderete TL, Hasson RE, Adam TC, Kim JS et al. Subcutaneous adipose tissue macrophage infiltration is associated with hepatic and visceral fat deposition, hyperinsulinemia, and stimulation of NF-κB stress pathway. Diabetes 2011; 60: 2802–2809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell KL, Makar KW, Kratz M, Foster-Schubert KE, McTiernan A, Ulrich CM . A pilot study of sampling subcutaneous adipose tissue to examine biomarkers of cancer risk. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2009; 2: 37–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Daum SM, Knittle J, Roseman K, Rom WN, Holstein EC . A simple technique for fat biopsy of PBB-exposed individuals. Environ Health Perspect 1978; 23: 183–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pasarica M, Gowronska-Kozak B, Burk D, Remedios I, Hymel D, Gimble J et al. Adipose tissue collagen VI in obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 5155–5162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tam CS, Covington JD, Bajpeyi S, Tchoukalova Y, Burk D, Johannsen DL et al. Weight gain reveals dramatic increases in skeletal muscle extracellular matrix remodeling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99: 1749–1757.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bastard JP, Cuevas J, Cohen S, Jardel C, Hainque B . Percutaneous adipose tissue biopsy by mini-liposuction for metabolic studies. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1994; 18: 466–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. van Beek L, Lips MA, Visser A, Pijl H, Ioan-Facsinay A, Toes R et al. Increased systemic and adipose tissue inflammation differentiates obese women with T2DM from obese women with normal glucose tolerance. Metab Clin Exp 2014; 63: 492–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hagman DK, Kuzma JN, Larson I, Foster-Schubert KE, Kuan L-Y, Cignarella A et al. Characterizing and quantifying leukocyte populations in human adipose tissue: impact of enzymatic tissue processing. J Immunol Methods 2012; 386: 50–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the SC CTSI (NIH/NCRR/NCATS) Grant # UL1TR000130 (TLA) and the Robert C and Veronica Atkins Foundation (MIG). TLA (principal investigator) supervised all aspects of the study, assisted with biopsies and was responsible for data analysis and manuscript preparation. MIG (coinvestigator) acted as study sponsor and mentor. FRS (coinvestigator) was the study physician and performed biopsies. EGG helped develop ultrasound-imaging procedures, while SDM, XS and JT developed the adipose tissue-processing protocols. All coauthors assisted with manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M I Goran.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alderete, T., Sattler, F., Sheng, X. et al. A novel biopsy method to increase yield of subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue. Int J Obes 39, 183–186 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.90

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.90

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links