Introduction

Infancy and early childhood are periods in which all aspects of child growth and development change remarkably (Institute for Juvenile Education, 2004). Parental involvement is a factor in childrearing (Masaki et al., 2011). However, many parents carry exceptional burdens in childcare, especially for raising children with developmental disabilities (DD) (Jellett et al., 2015; Nishijima et al., 2019; Nomura et al., 2020; Dissanayake et al., 2019). DD is defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, to include autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder characterized by hyperactivity, impulsivity, and inattention, and learning disabilities with impairments in the ability to hear, speak, and reason, although overall intellectual development is not delayed (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

In Japan, the Sukoyaka Oyako 21 s revision guidelines aim to promote childcare and family health support towards a society in which children grow up healthily (Ministry of Health, 2015). Fatherhood involvement is described as taking care of children, performing household chores, sharing the joy of raising children, and sharing the worries of child-raising while providing mental and physical care for the partner (Ministry of Health, 2021). Japanese local governments generally provide considerable medical, instructional, and emotional support to mothers and their families for child-raising, which indicates that such services are in demand. In particular, the parents of children with DD have a higher burden of childcare and more anxiety than do parents of healthy children, children with other disabilities, and children with chronic diseases (Kanematsu, 2015; Tsuda et al., 2012; Nakayama et al., 2013; Rachel et al., 2015; Dabrowska and Pisula, 2010; Lee, 2019). Thus, the importance of specialized and commensurate support appears even greater for DD.

Paternal participation in childcare is now being considered increasingly necessary to improve the child’s mental development (Murakami et al., 2013). Active childcare involvement following social networking service-based training programs for fathers raising children with ASD resulted in a significant decrease in child-rearing stress, an increase in self-affirmation of childcare, and a better relationship with the child (May et al., 2021). Other studies have shown that paternal involvement in raising children with ASD reduces maternal stress and increases maternal family adaptability (Rankin et al., 2019). Even in the case of fathers raising children with stereotyped development, Maehara found that active nurturing was essential for the child’s growth (Maehara et al., 2018). However, studies on assistance for fathers in the context of family support for children with DD requiring special care are lacking. A survey conducted in 2014 revealed that mothers had distinct differences from fathers in terms of child-rearing situations, attitudes and thoughts, and anxieties on the upbringing of children in need of additional care. Moreover, the amount and kind of help required by Japanese fathers suggested a need to consider specific ways to support them that were different from those for mothers (Ishida et al., 2018).

The purpose of this study was to identify insufficiencies in social support for fathers towards considering increased assistance for the paternal care of children with DD.

Methods

Research subjects

The study participants were fathers and mothers of children attending rehabilitation centers for disabled preschool children (age range: 2–5 years) from among 39 facilities in Nagano Prefecture, Japan. The investigation included 8 facilities following the approval of each facility director. A self-administered written questionnaire was mailed to participants after obtaining informed consent. Due to the young age of the children, only parental consent was obtained in this study. The survey period ranged from July to September 2016. This study was approved by our Institutional Ethics Committee (no. 4642) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Details of the investigation

The survey consisted of 19 items selected with reference to the Social Support Usage (contents and providers) items described by Ota (2010), the Code Matrix of Cases of Difficulties in Life for Mothers of Children with Developmental Disabilities reported by Yamashita (2013), and the Social Support Recognized by Mothers of Children with ASD items published by Fujita (2014). The 19 items were classified into four categories: information support (6 items), emotional support (7 items), evaluation support (3 items), and daily living support (3 items) (Table 1). Respondents were asked to indicate “yes” or “no” to sources of support among the four categories.

Table 1 Types of support and questions in the survey.

Statistical analysis

The survey results were subjected to chi-square testing between fathers and mothers. For items with an expected frequency of <5, Fisher’s exact test was used to determine significance. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 for Windows (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).

Ethical considerations

The purpose and voluntary nature of the study were specified in the questionnaire request form distributed to the subjects. Questionnaires were kept anonymous. No personal information other than basic attribute information was recorded. The respondents were assured that the survey results would be used for research purposes only.

Results

Response status

The surveys were sent to a total of 470 fathers and mothers. We received 186 completed questionnaires for a recovery rate of 39.6%. Since there were no omissions for any of the response items, all 186 surveys were included in the analysis. The respondents included 85 fathers and 101 mothers.

Participant attributes

The attributes of the participants are shown in Table 2. The 85 fathers were a mean age of 40.7 ± 8.8 years. The 101 mothers were a mean age of 37.7 ± 5.4 years. Over 80% of the respondents in both groups reported being in good general health.

Table 2 Attributes of the respondents.

Social support usage

Information support

The paternal respondents indicated their spouse as the main provider of information support for all 6 items (Table 3). For items 1–6, fathers primarily responded “spouse” and “welfare organizations”. These rates were all significantly different from the responses of mothers (p < 0.05). Regarding item 3, fathers answered “spouse” and “biological mother” as the top 2 sources of information support, which were also significantly different from the answers of mothers (p < 0.05). The maternal respondents cited “welfare organizations”, such as kindergartens and developmental disorder support centers, as the main provider of information support for all 6 items (Table 3). Secondary sources of information included “welfare institutions” (items 1, 2, 4, and 6; data not shown), “biological mother” (item 3), and “spouse” (item 5). Thus, the maternal caregivers tended to obtain child-raising information from a broader range of sources.

Table 3 Information support survey results.

Emotional support

The paternal respondents answered “spouse” as the main provider of emotional support for all 7 items (Table 4). For items 1 and 2, fathers reported “spouse” and “welfare organizations”, which were significantly different from the responses of mothers (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). For item 3, the top 2 paternal emotional support categories were “spouse” and “colleagues or bosses at work”. These were significantly different from the answers of mothers (p < 0.001 and p < 0.000, respectively). For items 4–7, fathers and mothers reported “spouse” as the main source at comparable rates. The maternal respondents cited “welfare organizations” as the main provider of support for items 1 and 2 (Table 4). For items 3–7, mothers answered “spouse” as the main provider. The second most common source tended to be “biological mothers” (items 3–6).

Table 4 Emotional support survey results.

Daily living support

Fathers frequently listed “spouse” as the primary provider of daily living support (Table 5). For item 1, The response percentage of “biological mother” was significantly lower than the answers of mothers (p < 0.01). Regarding item 2, the response frequency of “spouse” was significantly higher than the responses of mothers. The response percentage of “colleagues or bosses at work”, which included such support as an understanding of flexible working styles and recommendations for taking time off, was significantly higher than the answers of mothers (p < 0.000). For item 3, the response percentage of “colleagues or bosses at work” was significantly more frequent than the replies of mothers. Mothers cited “spouse” (p < 0.01) as the main provider of daily living support for all three categories, followed next by “biological mother” (items 1 and 2) or “biological mother” and “colleagues and bosses at work” equally (item 3) (Table 5). Thus, both parents primarily received help with daily living for childcare and housework from their spouse and biological mother. In terms of support at work, fathers tended to receive additional help from colleagues and superiors.

Table 5 Daily living support survey results.

Evaluation support

Fathers answered “spouse”, followed next by “biological mother”, as the main provider of support for all 3 items (Table 6). For all items, the response frequency of “biological mother” was significantly lower than the replies of mothers (p < 0.01 for items 1 and 2 and p < 0.000 for item 3). Regarding the mothers’ answers for evaluation support, the top 2 sources for all 3 items were “spouse” and “welfare organizations” (Table 6). Taken together, fathers were more likely to receive support from family members, while mothers tended to consult their family as well as non-family welfare organizations.

Table 6 Evaluation support survey results.

Discussion

The present study examined for insufficiencies in social support for fathers raising children with DD. In contrast to mothers, fathers tended to receive support from a narrower range of sources that was restricted primarily to close family members. These findings suggest a need to consider increased assistance for fathers from experts and external sources, such as advice on childcare from nursery school or rehabilitation center staff and other specialists, as well as asking grandparents for help in raising the child.

Support for obtaining necessary information for managing children with DD (category 1)

In the case of fathers, the vast majority received information and advice on specialized knowledge and skills, such as understanding DD and child-raising methods, from their spouse, followed next by welfare organizations. The frequency of fathers who used specialized agencies as their primary information source was significantly lower than that of mothers. In their review of the literature on DD, Ishii et al. found that mothers who obtained reliable information exhibited a high degree of appropriateness in their child’s disease management and behavior along with good mental health (Ishii and Asano, 2017). This may be missing among fathers based on the present study. Information provided from non-specialists can be imprecise and uncertain, which may lead to insufficient understanding and skill acquisition by the father about DD and complicate raising the child. Without a system providing reliable information, fathers may not be able to adequately respond to the needs of the child; this could raise the child’s stress, reduce the father’s interest in childrearing, increase the burden on the mother, and ultimately hinder the child’s growth. Another possible reason for the minority of fathers receiving support from specialized institutions was the difficulty in finding the opportunity and time to visit centers due to work commitments. In considering the establishment of a paternity support system, it will be necessary to incorporate the circumstances and time limitations of fathers. Men in Japan typically work long hours, with frequent overtime and mandatory socializing with colleagues and customers (Ministry of Health, 2019; Nishida and Terashima, 2019). On the other hand, mothers primarily received support from specialists at welfare and medical organizations and presumably from contacts met through medical care and education, which indicated that they had access to a variety of useful and reliable sources. More than half of fathers received support from their spouses in obtaining information and counseling services to help them balance work and child-rearing responsibilities in the context of DD. However, few male respondents received support from their workplace or specialized institutions, indicating that they were unable to consistently get information from their company for raising their disabled child. Although the Japanese Work-Life Balance Charter 2008 states that society as a whole must support individuals and their families in order to achieve a proper work–life balance (Ministry of Health, 2007), the above findings suggest that such social systems have not yet been developed in terms of information support.

Emotional and evaluative support (categories 2 and 4)

In the case of fathers, ~70% of respondents cited their spouse as the main source of emotional support for all 6 items in category 2. Such encouragement is critical in interpersonal relationships to decrease psychological stress via positive perceptions from others and the empathy described to be necessary for maintaining good relationships (Kato, 2002). The present survey indicated that fathers were most frequently empowered by their spouse’s recognition of their parenting and their social life, including work. Apart from their spouse, fathers received limited emotional support from their biological mother (9.4–29.4% for all items) and welfare organizations (1.2–21.2% for all items). For item 3 in category 2 regarding consultations on personal problems and relationships, colleagues in the workplace were a notable source of support, cited by 47.1% of paternal respondents. In order to effectively raise children with DD, it is deemed essential to enhance the so-called empowerment of the family through cooperation within families, between specialists and families, and between local governments and families (Wakimizu et al., 2011). For fathers to become more actively involved in the upbringing of children with DD, in addition to support from the spouse and specialized institutions, interactions with other families having children with DD will also be a major factor (Ibuki et al., 2005). Fathers need more father-to-father connections and learning as well (Ishida et al., 2018), suggesting that an inter-family support system may be beneficial. In the case of mothers, a higher frequency of respondents answered that they had consulted with welfare organizations and specialists regarding the childcare and nursing of children with DD in addition to receiving emotional support from their spouse and biological mother. It was also evident that they obtained advice and peace of mind regarding their overall life from a wider range of sources than did fathers. Receiving emotional support from their spouse reduces anxiety about childrearing and enables mothers to think positively about childcare and maintain a smooth mother–child relationship (Mihara and Matsumoto, 2012). According to Yamashita et al. (2016), the father’s high appreciation of the mother’s parenting behavior and utmost support for the child help develop the mother’s self-confidence and sense of efficacy as a parent. Also in the present study, fathers appeared to give psychological support to their spouses, which might have provided empowerment.

There were significant differences between fathers and mothers in the sources of evaluative support. The fathers of children with DD were limited to their spouse and biological mother for shaping their views and attitudes towards childrearing. On the other hand, mothers were seen to receive more support from outside the family, such as from welfare organizations, in addition to their spouse and biological mother. The reason for this may be that fathers primarily play a role in supporting the family’s economic base by working and have fewer opportunities to establish relationships with support organizations than do mothers. Moreover, since fathers have more limited chances to obtain recognition from specialists and supporters other than family members, it is possible that they have difficulty in correctly understanding and responding to DD. Indeed, fathers appeared less able to receive the benefits of peer support to instill good feelings towards the child, confidence in childcare, and reduced childcare stress since they had fewer opportunities to be recognized by friends and others (Shimada et al., 2019).

Direct support for daily life (category 3)

The main source of childcare and housework support was the spouse for both parents, with assistance from the biological mother or mother-in-law in the remainder of cases. Less than half of fathers received direct support for work and other duties from their colleagues or bosses, such as flexible work schedules (e.g., flextime) and recommendations for taking days off (Ministry of Health, 2020). These results indicated that couples tended to primarily support each other with childcare and housework duties. As the minority of respondents received support from other family members or work connections, the household burden on families containing children with DD may be considered as a result of increases in the number of nuclear families in Japan and the reported weakening of social capital (Ueda and Okamoto, 2011). Regarding extra-household support, it will be necessary to improve administrative services and establish better systems in local communities. A recent nationwide survey from Japan found that while the need for paternity initiatives was high in many municipalities, there was a clear discrepancy between awareness and actual practice (Ozaki, 2016). Therefore, it appears urgent to establish formal continuous support programs for fathers to connect with each other and learn specific measures for raising children, especially youths with DD.

Limitations and further research

The number of subjects included in this survey was small and might have been insufficient to consider all childcare situations; larger studies are needed to reduce possible selection bias and further identify other paternal challenges and information support needs. Future investigations should also aim to clarify the ideal family role for fathers of children with DD, the obstacles for not seeking support in some cases, and possible tailored assistance programs for fathers from experts and the government. Lastly, the findings in this report were obtained in Japan in reference mainly to pre-COVID-19 studies and may not be directly applicable in other countries and circumstances. Especially with increases in remote working and limitations in public services due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, future studies will need to consider the rapidly changing face of working and childcare (Hirai and Watanabe, 2021).

Conclusion

In the upbringing of children with DD, Japanese fathers reported fewer social support sources as compared with mothers and were primarily dependent on their spouses. Consequently, a lack of adequate measures for understanding DD, such as the acquisition of appropriate coping methods and follow-up to maintain mental health, likely hinders the involvement of the father in raising children with DD. In addition to considering the development of a parenting support system for fathers and increased peer support, more detailed surveys are warranted on the actual condition of fathers’ work–life balance and inter-family relationships to promote more concrete father support measures, empower fathers, and enhance paternal roles in raising children with DD.