Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

CrvA and CrvB form a curvature-inducing module sufficient to induce cell-shape complexity in Gram-negative bacteria

Abstract

Bacterial species have diverse cell shapes that enable motility, colonization and virulence. The cell wall defines bacterial shape and is primarily built by two cytoskeleton-guided synthesis machines, the elongasome and the divisome. However, the mechanisms producing complex shapes, like the curved-rod shape of Vibrio cholerae, are incompletely defined. Previous studies have reported that species-specific regulation of cytoskeleton-guided machines enables formation of complex bacterial shapes such as cell curvature and cellular appendages. In contrast, we report that CrvA and CrvB are sufficient to induce complex cell shape autonomously of the cytoskeleton in V. cholerae. The autonomy of the CrvAB module also enables it to induce curvature in the Gram-negative species Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Caulobacter crescentus and Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Using inducible gene expression, quantitative microscopy and biochemistry, we show that CrvA and CrvB circumvent the need for patterning via cytoskeletal elements by regulating each other to form an asymmetrically localized, periplasmic structure that binds directly to the cell wall. The assembly and disassembly of this periplasmic structure enables dynamic changes in cell shape. Bioinformatics indicate that CrvA and CrvB may have diverged from a single ancestral hybrid protein. Using fusion experiments in V. cholerae, we find that a synthetic CrvA/B hybrid protein is sufficient to induce curvature on its own, but that expression of two distinct proteins, CrvA and CrvB, promotes more rapid curvature induction. We conclude that morphological complexity can arise independently of cell-shape specification by the core cytoskeleton-guided synthesis machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: CrvA and CrvB curve bacterial cells.
Fig. 2: CrvA and CrvB curve E. coli despite inhibition of core machinery.
Fig. 3: CrvA and CrvB break symmetry by forming a periplasmic filament that binds PG.
Fig. 4: CrvA and CrvB induce curvature more rapidly than the sum of their parts.
Fig. 5: CrvA and CrvB synergize to promote filament assembly in V. cholerae.
Fig. 6: CrvB is required for CrvA activity in E. coli and CrvA localization drives shape dynamics in V. cholerae.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of the study are available in this article or on the Princeton DataSpace (https://doi.org/10.34770/b652-mz26). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The custom MATLAB routines used for processing and analysing microscopy data are freely available from the corresponding author on request.

References

  1. Young, K. D. The selective value of bacterial shape. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70, 660–703 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang, D. C., Blair, K. M. & Salama, N. R. Staying in shape: the impact of cell shape on bacterial survival in diverse environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 187–203 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Orr, R. G., Cheng, X., Vidali, L. & Bezanilla, M. Orchestrating cell morphology from the inside out – using polarized cell expansion in plants as a model. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 62, 46–53 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogel, V. & Sheetz, M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 265–275 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caccamo, P. D. & Brun, Y. V. The molecular basis of noncanonical bacterial morphology. Trends Microbiol. 26, 191–208 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor, J. A., Sichel, S. R. & Salama, N. R. Bent bacteria: a comparison of cell shape mechanisms in proteobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 73, 457–480 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Typas, A., Banzhaf, M., Gross, C. A. & Vollmer, W. From the regulation of peptidoglycan synthesis to bacterial growth and morphology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 123–136 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, X. et al. GTPase activity-coupled treadmilling of the bacterial tubulin FtsZ organizes septal cell wall synthesis. Science 355, 744–747 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bisson-Filho, A. W. et al. Treadmilling by FtsZ filaments drives peptidoglycan synthesis and bacterial cell division. Science 355, 739–743 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ursell, T. S. et al. Rod-like bacterial shape is maintained by feedback between cell curvature and cytoskeletal localization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E1025–E1034 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Garner, E. C. et al. Coupled, circumferential motions of the cell wall synthesis machinery and MreB filaments in B. subtilis. Science 333, 222–225 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schuech, R., Hoehfurtner, T., Smith, D. J. & Humphries, S. Motile curved bacteria are Pareto-optimal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14440–14447 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bartlett, T. M. et al. A periplasmic polymer curves Vibrio cholerae and promotes pathogenesis. Cell 168, 172–185 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Persat, A., Stone, H. A. & Gitai, Z. The curved shape of Caulobacter crescentus enhances surface colonization in flow. Nat. Commun. 5, 3824 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ausmees, N., Kuhn, J. R. & Jacobs-Wagner, C. The bacterial cytoskeleton: an intermediate filament-like function in cell shape. Cell 115, 705–713 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Charbon, G., Cabeen, M. T. & Jacobs-Wagner, C. Bacterial intermediate filaments: in vivo assembly, organization, and dynamics of crescentin. Genes Dev. 23, 1131–1144 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cabeen, M. T. et al. Bacterial cell curvature through mechanical control of cell growth. EMBO J. 28, 1208–1219 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Billini, M., Biboy, J., Kuhn, J., Vollmer, W. & Thanbichler, M. A specialized MreB-dependent cell wall biosynthetic complex mediates the formation of stalk-specific peptidoglycan in Caulobacter crescentus. PLoS Genet. 15, e1007897 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wagner, J. K., Galvani, C. D. & Brun, Y. V. Caulobacter crescentus requires RodA and MreB for stalk synthesis and prevention of ectopic pole formation. J. Bacteriol. 187, 544–553 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dent, E. W., Gupton, S. L. & Gertler, F. B. The growth cone cytoskeleton in axon outgrowth and guidance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a001800 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, J. W. & McKnight, C. J. Molecular model of the microvillar cytoskeleton and organization of the brush border. PLoS ONE 5, e9406 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Farmer, J. J. III et al. in Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria, 1–79 (John Wiley & Sons, 2015).

  23. Cowles, K. N. & Gitai, Z. Surface association and the MreB cytoskeleton regulate pilus production, localization and function in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 76, 1411–1426 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Srivastava, P., Demarre, G., Karpova, T. S., McNally, J. & Chattoraj, D. K. Changes in nucleoid morphology and origin localization upon inhibition or alteration of the actin homolog, MreB, of Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 189, 7450–7463 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Cameron, T. A., Anderson-Furgeson, J., Zupan, J. R., Zik, J. J. & Zambryski, P. C. Peptidoglycan synthesis machinery in Agrobacterium tumefaciens during unipolar growth and cell division. mBio 5, e01219–14 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Howell, M. et al. Agrobacterium tumefaciens divisome proteins regulate the transition from polar growth to cell division. Mol. Microbiol. 111, 1074–1092 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ouzounov, N. et al. MreB orientation correlates with cell diameter in Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 111, 1035–1043 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Dorr, T. et al. Differential requirement for PBP1a and PBP1b in in vivo and in vitro fitness of Vibrio cholerae. Infect. Immun. 82, 2115–2124 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bratton, B. P., Shaevitz, J. W., Gitai, Z. & Morgenstein, R. M. MreB polymers and curvature localization are enhanced by RodZ and predict E. coli’s cylindrical uniformity. Nat. Commun. 9, 2797 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hussain, S. et al. MreB filaments align along greatest principal membrane curvature to orient cell wall synthesis. eLife 7, e32471 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Schierle, C. F. et al. The DsbA signal sequence directs efficient, cotranslational export of passenger proteins to the Escherichia coli periplasm via the signal recognition particle pathway. J. Bacteriol. 185, 5706–5713 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Weaver, A. I. et al. Genetic determinants of penicillin tolerance in Vibrio cholerae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62, e01326-18 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Taguchi, A., Kahne, D. & Walker, S. Chemical tools to characterize peptidoglycan synthases. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 53, 44–50 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Battistuzzi, F. U., Feijao, A. & Hedges, S. B. A genomic timescale of prokaryote evolution: insights into the origin of methanogenesis, phototrophy, and the colonization of land. BMC Evol. Biol. 4, 44 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang, C., Brown, P. J., Ducret, A. & Brun, Y. V. Sequential evolution of bacterial morphology by co-option of a developmental regulator. Nature 506, 489–493 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Skorupski, K. & Taylor, R. K. Positive selection vectors for allelic exchange. Gene 169, 47–52 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Edwards, R. A., Keller, L. H. & Schifferli, D. M. Improved allelic exchange vectors and their use to analyze 987P fimbria gene expression. Gene 207, 149–157 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bina, X. R., Wong, E. A., Bina, T. F. & Bina, J. E. Construction of a tetracycline inducible expression vector and characterization of its use in Vibrio cholerae. Plasmid 76, 87–94 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Guzman, L. M., Belin, D., Carson, M. J. & Beckwith, J. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J. Bacteriol. 177, 4121–4130 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bridges, A. A. & Bassler, B. L. The intragenus and interspecies quorum-sensing autoinducers exert distinct control over Vibrio cholerae biofilm formation and dispersal. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000429 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sawabe, T. et al. Updating the Vibrio clades defined by multilocus sequence phylogeny: proposal of eight new clades, and the description of Vibrio tritonius sp. nov. Front. Microbiol. 4, 414 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Criscuolo, A. & Gribaldo, S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 210 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Afgan, E. et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W537–W544 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Henikoff, S. & Henikoff, J. G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10915–10919 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Capra, J. A. & Singh, M. Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation. Bioinformatics 23, 1875–1882 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Desmarais, S. M., Cava, F., de Pedro, M. A. & Huang, K. C. Isolation and preparation of bacterial cell walls for compositional analysis by ultra performance liquid chromatography. J. Vis. Exp. 83, e51183 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Gitai and Shaevitz laboratories for helpful discussions, the Bina and Bassler laboratories for reagents, and J. Sanfilippo, M. Koch, C. Ellison, J. Shaevitz and T. Silhavy for helpful feedback on the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant (1DP1AI124669 to Z.G.) from the National Institutes of Health, an institutional training grant (T32GM007388 to T.M.B. and E.B.), a grant from the National Science Foundation (PHY-1734030 to B.P.B.) and Graduate Research Fellowships from the National Science Foundation (DGE-2039656 to N.R.M., DGE-2039656 to K.J.C. and DGE-1656466 to T.M.B.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.R.M., E.B., K.J.C. and T.M.B. performed all the experiments with design input from Z.G. N.R.M. and B.P.B. peformed the data and sequence analysis. Z.G. and N.R.M. wrote the manuscript with input from the other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zemer Gitai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Microbiology thanks William Margolin, Jie Xiao and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 CrvAB sequence alignment and complementation analysis.

a, The crvA and crvB open reading frames drawn to scale at the native locus in V. cholerae. b, Alignment of V. cholerae CrvB amino acid sequence to V. cholerae CrvA by Clustalω49. ce, Curvature of ΔcrvA (c), ΔcrvB (d) or ΔcrvAB (e) populations expressing an empty vector (EV) or plasmids with the indicated gene(s). Images represent 95th percentile of curvature in respective populations. Scale bars, 1 μm; images within each figure panel are to scale. p-values determined by two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test; n=300 from three biological replicates.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Quantification of heterologous CrvAB expression.

a, Curvature of populations expressing an empty vector (+EV) or a plasmid with crvA and crvB (+crvAB). p-values determined by two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test; n = 300 from three biological replicates. b, Cumulative distribution functions of populations in A ± bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. c, Images represent indicated quantiles from populations in A. Each row corresponds to the species labelled to the left of A. Scale bars are 1μm; images within each species are to scale. a, The crvA and crvB open reading frames drawn to scale at the native locus in V. cholerae. b, Alignment of V. cholerae CrvB amino acid sequence to V. cholerae CrvA by Clustalω49. c-e, Curvature of (c) ΔcrvA, (d) ΔcrvB, or (e) ΔcrvAB populations expressing an empty vector (EV) or plasmids with the indicated gene(s). c-e, Images represent 95th percentile of curvature in respective populations. Scale bars are 1μm; images within each figure panel are to scale. p-values determined by two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test; n = 300 from three biological replicates.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Morphology of E. coli and V. cholerae after inhibition of PG synthesis machinery.

a, Quantified cell widths of A22-treated populations of E. coli from Fig. 2a. b, Representative images of wild-type and ΔcrvAB V. cholerae after growth with the elongasome inhibitor, A22. c, Quantification of curvature from populations in B. d, Quantification of cell width from populations in B. e, Population curvature and representative images of indicated V. cholerae strains. n = 300 from three biological replicates. b,e, Images represent 95th percentile of curvature in respective populations. c,d, p-values from two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test; n = 200 from two biological replicates. Scale bars are 1μm; images within each figure panel are to scale.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Functionality, time lapse, and osmotic dissociation of fluorescent CrvA and CrvB fusions.

a, Quantified curvature of populations of V. cholerae expressing the indicated fusion proteins from the native genomic locus. Data from wild type and ΔcrvAB are repeated from Fig. 1a. b, Time lapse images of CrvB-GFP and CrvA-mCherry structures in growing V. cholerae. See Movie S1 for full time lapse. c, Quantified curvature of E. coli populations expressing an empty vector (+EV), a plasmid with crvA and crvB (+crvAB), or the same plasmid with crvA-mCherry and crvB-GFP. Data from +EV and +crvAB are repeated from Fig. 1c. d, Osmotic shock of V. cholerae expressing crvA-GFP or crvB-GFP. a,c, Images were taken 6 h after dilution of saturated overnight cultures. Images represent 95th percentile of curvature in respective populations. c, p-values from two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test; n = 300 from three biological replicates. Scale bars are 1μm in A-C and 5μm in D; images within each figure panel are to scale.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Quantification and localization of crvACBS in V. cholerae.

a, Schematic of crv locus and representative image of cells expressing the crvACBS chimera tagged with msfGFP (CrvACBS-GFP). b, Quantified curvature of populations from overnight cultures of indicated V. cholerae strains. Data from wild-type, ΔcrvB, and crvACBS are repeated from Fig. 4. p-values from two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test; n = 300 from three biological replicates. Scale bars are 1μm; images within each figure panel are to scale.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 The evolution of CrvA/B/Y and functional study of CrvY.

a, Extended cladogram from Fig. 1b. b, Linear form of extended cladogram in A. c, Phylogeny of all sequenced CrvA, CrvB, and CrvY homologues. d, Curvature of populations of wild-type A. fischeri or ΔcrvY. e, Curvature of populations of V. cholerae ΔcrvAB expressing an empty vector (+EV) or a plasmid with crvY from A. fischeri (+crvY). a,b, Numbers are ‘Clade IDs’ for reference to Supplementary Table 2, which contains full composition of terminal nodes. d, Terminal nodes are placed at the mean ± standard deviation of the sequences collapsed into each node. d,e, Images represent 95th percentile of curvature in respective populations. Scale bars are 1μm; images within each figure panel are to scale. p-values determined by two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test; n = 300 from three biological replicates.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Comparison of CrvA and CrvB concentrations under inducible expression.

a, Western blots of CrvA-GFP (top) and CrvB-GFP (bottom) quantified in Fig. 5e with molecular weight standards (M). Separate molecular weight standard in top panel is from the same blot as samples to right. Representative of three biological replicates with similar results. b, Western blots of crvA-GFP and crvA-GFP;crvB overexpression from Fig. 6a,b with molecular weight standard (M). Separate left and right panels are from the same blot. Representative of two biological replicates with similar results. c, Representative images from anydrotetracycline (tet) overexpression of CrvA and CrvB-GFP in E. coli. Scale bar is 1μm; all images are to scale. d, Quantification of curvature from populations in C. n.s.=confidence <95%; *=confidence >95%; **=confidence >99%; ***=confidence >99.9% (see Supplementary Table 3 for exact p-values); two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni correction; n = 100 from two biological replicates. e, Western blot of crvB-GFP and crvA;crvB-GFP overexpression from (c). Separate molecular weight standard (M) and right panel are from the same blot. Representative of two biological replicates with similar results.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 CrvAB overexpression drives early curvature.

a, Curvature and representative images of populations overexpressing CrvA and CrvB two hours after back-dilution into media containing anhydrotetracycline. b, Phase contrast image from A showing the extreme range of curvatures upon overexpression that are not captured by our quantitative analysis. a, p-values calculated from two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test; n = 300 from three biological replicates. Scale bars are 1μm in A and 5μm in B; images within each figure panel are to scale.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table 1, descriptions of Tables 2 and 3, and captions for Videos 1–4.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 2

Genomic accession numbers, Crv protein accession numbers, and clade labels for each of 921 Vibrionacae genomes. Clade labels are listed in Extended Data Fig. 6b,c. Excel file with two header rows and 921 data rows. Column names (first header row) and descriptions of the data in each column (second header row) are included for each of the 17 columns.

Supplementary Table 3

Table of P values from statistical tests represented as symbols in figures.

Supplementary Video 1

Time lapse of intact CrvA–mCherry/CrvB–GFP structure in V. cholerae cell from Extended Data Fig. 4b. The fluorescent structure remains intact throughout the time course and remains associated with the curved daughter cell from the initial division. Scale bar, 1 μm.

Supplementary Video 2

Time lapse of CrvA–mCherry/CrvB–GFP structures in V. cholerae filamented on low melting point agarose pads containing 5 μg ml−1 cephalexin. As cells filament, CrvAB structures do not re-localize to regions of high curvature and new CrvAB structures can be seen forming in straight regions of the cell.

Supplementary Video 3

Time lapse of CrvA–mCherry/CrvB–GFP structures in V. cholerae filamented on low melting point agarose pads containing 5 μg ml−1 cephalexin. As cells filament, CrvAB structures do not re-localize to regions of high curvature and new CrvAB structures can be seen forming in straight regions of the cell.

Supplementary Video 4

Time lapse of CrvA–mCherry/CrvB–GFP structures in V. cholerae recapitulating dynamics of population curvature and CrvAB localization observed in time courses from liquid culture. Filled green arrows point to specific CrvA–mCherry/CrvB–GFP structures of interest and outlined green arrows indicate the position of cells before those structures have formed.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Numerical data from Fig. 1a.

Source Data Fig. 2

Numerical data from Fig. 2b.

Source Data Fig. 3

Unprocessed gels.

Source Data Fig. 4

Numerical data from Fig. 4b and c.

Source Data Fig. 5

Unprocessed blot from Fig. 5f and numerical data from Fig. 5a,c–e.

Source Data Fig. 6

Numerical data from Fig. 6b and c.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Numerical data from Extended Data Fig. 1c and d.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Numerical data from Extended Data Fig. 2a and b.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Numerical data from Extended Data Fig. 3a,c–e.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Numerical data from Extended Data Fig. 4a and c.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Numerical data from Extended Data Fig. 5b.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Numerical data from Extended Data Fig. 6d,e.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Unprocessed blots and numerical data from Extended Data Fig. 7d.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Numerical data from Extended Data Fig. 8a.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, N.R., Blackman, E., Bratton, B.P. et al. CrvA and CrvB form a curvature-inducing module sufficient to induce cell-shape complexity in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat Microbiol 6, 910–920 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00924-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00924-w

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology