Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

The 'best available science' to inform 1.5 °C policy choices

Nature Climate Change volume 6, pages 646–649 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

An IPCC Special Report on 1.5 °C should focus on resolving fundamental scientific and political uncertainties, not fixate on developing unachievable mitigation pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The ten scenarios from the IPCC AR52 and used in the UNEP Emissions Gap Report4, coloured by the model name and version.

References

  1. Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev1 (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2015).

  2. Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 6 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rogelj, J. et al. Nature Clim. Change 5, 519–527 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The Emissions Gap Report 2015 (United Nations Environment Programme, 2015).

  5. Synthesis Report on the Aggregate Effect of the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2015).

  6. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  7. Met Office. 2015: The Warmest Year on Record, say Scientists; www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2016/2015-global-temperature (accessed 24 January 2016).

  8. Holthaus, E. Our Planet's Temperature Just Reached a Terrifying Milestone http://go.nature.com/kBYAgX (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, K. Nature Geosci. 8, 898–900 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Geden, O. Nature 521, 27–28 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rogelj, J. et al. Nature Clim. Change 6, 245–252 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuss, S. et al. Nature Clim. Change 4, 850–853 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Houghton, R. A., Byers, B. & Nassikas, A. A. Nature Clim. Change 5, 1022–1023 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Creutzig, F. et al. GCB Bioenergy 7, 916–944 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Coninck, H. & Benson, S. M. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39, 243–270 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. The Global Status of CCS: 2015 (Global CCS Institute, 2015); http://go.nature.com/aXPQAU

  18. van Vuuren, D. P., van Sluisveld, M. & Hof, A. F. Implications of Long-Term Scenarios for Medium-Term Targets (2050) (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2015); http://go.nature.com/16LZaH

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, P. et al. Nature Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Williamson, P. Nature 530, 153–155 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 659–740 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shine, K. P., Berntsen, T., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Stuber, N. & Skeie, R. B. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 1903–1914 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L., Reisinger, A., Meinshausen, M. & Riahi, K. Nature 493, 79–83 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hulme, M. Nature Clim. Change 6, 222–224 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stern, N. Nature 530, 407–409 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kriegler, E. et al. Clim. Change Econ. 4, 1340008 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

G.P.P. was supported by the Research Council of Norway project 209701.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Glen P. Peters is at the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research – Oslo (CICERO), Norway,

    Glen P. Peters

Authors
  1. Glen P. Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glen P. Peters.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The 'best available science' to inform 1.5 °C policy choices (PDF 1642 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peters, G. The 'best available science' to inform 1.5 °C policy choices. Nature Clim Change 6, 646–649 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3000

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing