Abstract
The recent increase in the frequency and impact of natural disasters1 highlights the need to provide the public with accurate information concerning disaster prevalence. Most approaches to this problem assume that providing summaries of the nature and scale of disasters will lead people to reduce their exposure to risk2. Here we present experimental evidence that such ex post ‘news reports’ of disaster occurrences can increase the tolerance for risk-taking (which implies that rare events are underweighted3). This result is robust across several hundred rounds of choices in a simulated microworld, persists even when the long-run expected value of risky choices is substantially lower than safe choices, and is contingent on providing risk information about disasters that have been (personally) experienced and those that have been avoided (‘forgone’ outcomes). The results suggest that augmenting personal experience with information summaries of the number of adverse events (for example, storms, floods) in different regions may, paradoxically, increase the appeal of a disaster-prone region. This finding implies a need to communicate long-term trends in severe climatic events, thereby reinforcing the accumulation of events, and the increase in their associated risks, across time4.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Munich RE Topics GEO: Natural Catastrophes 2014 Analyses, Assessments, Positions 2015 Issue (Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft, 2015); http://www.munichre.com/site/corporate/get/documents_E1018449711/mr/assetpool.shared/Documents/5_Touch/_Publications/302-08606_en.pdf
Kunreuther, H. et al. Risk management and climate change. Nature Clim. Change 3, 447–450 (2013).
Erev, I. & Roth, A. Maximization, learning and economic behaviour. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10818–10825 (2014).
Weber, E. U. Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Clim. Change 77, 103–120 (2006).
Trenberth, K. E. Framing the way to relate climate extremes to climate change. Clim. Change 115, 283–290 (2012).
Miller, J. S. Geographical information systems: Unique analytic capabilities for the traffic safety community. Trans. Res. Rec. 1734, 21–28 (2000).
Plug, C., Xia, J. & Caulfield, C. Spatial and temporal visualisation techniques for crash analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43, 1937–1946 (2011).
Zheng, Y. A preliminary evaluation of the impact of local accident information on the public perception of road safety. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf. 92, 1170–1182 (2007).
Donovan, G. H., Champ, P. A. & Butry, D. T. Wildfire risk and housing prices: A case study from Colorado Springs. Land Econ. 83, 217–233 (2007).
Samarasinghe, O. & Sharp, B. Flood prone risk and amenity values: A spatial hedonic analysis. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 54, 457–475 (2010).
Beron, K., Murdoch, J., Thayer, M. & Vijverberg, W. An analysis of the housing market before and after the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Land Econ. 73, 101–113 (1997).
Palm, R. I. Public response to earthquake hazard information. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 71, 389–399 (1981).
Oki, S. & Nakayachi, K. Paradoxical effects of the record-high tsunamis caused by the 2011 Tohoku earthquake on public judgments of danger. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2, 37–45 (2012).
Budescu, D. V., Por, H. H., Broomell, S. B. & Smithson, M. The interpretation of IPCC probabilistic statements around the world. Nature Clim. Change 4, 508–512 (2014).
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E. & Vaughan, S. The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Clim. Change 3, 399–404 (2013).
Broomell, S. B., Budescu, D. V. & Por, H. H. Personal experience with climate change predicts intentions to act. Glob. Environ. Change 32, 67–73 (2015).
Myers, T. A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Akerlof, K. & Leiserowitz, A. A. The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Clim. Change 3, 343–347 (2012).
Reser, J. P., Bradley, G. L. & Ellul, M. C. Encountering climate change: ‘Seeing’ is more than ‘believing’. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 5, 521–537 (2014).
Hertwig, R. & Erev, I. The description-experience gap in risky choice. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 517–523 (2009).
Yechiam, E., Rakow, T. & Newell, B. R. Super-underweighting of rare events with repeated descriptive summaries. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 28, 67–75 (2015).
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291 (1979).
Yechiam, E. & Busemeyer, J. R. The effect of foregone payoffs on underweighting small probability events. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 19, 1–16 (2006).
Lejarraga, T. & Gonzalez, C. Effects of feedback and complexity on repeated decisions from description. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. 117, 286–295 (2011).
Yuviler-Gavish, N. & Gopher, D. Effect of descriptive information and experience and automation reliance. Hum. Factors 53, 230–244 (2011).
Weber, E. U. & Stern, P. C. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am. Psychol. 66, 315–328 (2011).
Hansen, J., Sato, S. & Ruedy, R. Perception of climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14726–14727 (2012).
Hogarth, R. M. & Soyer, E. Communicating forecasts: The simplicity of simulated experience. J. Bus. Res. 68, 1800–1809 (2015).
Hoffrage, U., Lindsey, S., Herwig, R. & Gigerenzer, G. Communicating statistical information. Science 290, 2261–2262 (2000).
Henrich, L., McClure, J. & Crozier, M. Effects of risk framing on earthquake risk perception: Life-time frequencies enhance recognition of the risk. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 13, 145–160 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Leverhulme Trust (RPG-384), by the I-CORE programme of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and the Israel Science Foundation (Center No. 41), and by the Australian Research Council (LP120100224). B.R.N. received salary support from an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT110100151) and acknowledges support of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (CE110001028). We thank A. Kary and R. Parikh for assistance with data collection and T. Lejarraga for insightful comments on an earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.R.N., T.R. and E.Y. devised and designed the experiments. M.S. developed the computer program and implemented the designs. B.R.N. and T.R. oversaw the running of the experiments. B.R.N., T.R. and E.Y. conducted the data analyses and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newell, B., Rakow, T., Yechiam, E. et al. Rare disaster information can increase risk-taking. Nature Clim Change 6, 158–161 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2822
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2822
This article is cited by
-
Educating physicians on strong opioids by descriptive versus simulated-experience formats: a randomized controlled trial
BMC Medical Education (2022)
-
Broad bracketing for low probability events
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (2020)