Abstract
Aim:
To investigate the validity and sensitivity of an automatic movement detection system developed by our laboratory for the formalin test in rats.
Methods:
The effects of systemic morphine and local anesthetic lidocaine on the nociceptive behaviors induced by formalin subcutaneously injected into the hindpaw were examined by using an automated movement detection system and manual measuring methods.
Results:
Formalin subcutaneously injected into the hindpaw produced typical biphasic nociceptive behaviors (agitation). The mean agitation event rate during a 60-min observation period increased linearly following increases in the formalin concentration (0.0%, 0.5%, 1.5%, 2.5%, and 5%, 50 μL). Systemic application of morphine of different doses (1, 2, and 5 mg/kg) 10-min prior to formalin injection depressed the agitation responses induced by formalin injection in a dose-dependent manner, and the antinociceptive effect induced by the largest dose (5 mg/kg) of morphine was significantly antagonized by systemic application of the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1.25 mg/kg). Local anesthetic lidocaine (20 mg/kg) injected into the ipsilateral ankle subskin 5-min prior to formalin completely blocked the agitation response to formalin injection. These results were comparable to those obtained from manual measure of the incidence of flinching or the duration time of licking/biting of the injected paw.
Conclusion:
These data suggest that this automated movement detection system for formalin test is a simple, validated measure with good pharmacological sensitivity suitable for discovering novel analgesics or investigating central pain mechanisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Dubuisson D, Dennis SG . The formalin test: a quantitative study of the analgesic effects of morphine, meperidine, and brainstem stimulation in rats and cats. Pain 1977; 4: 161–74.
Murrary CW, Porreca F, Cowan A . Methodological refinements to the mouse paw formalin test: an animal model of tonic pain. J Pharmacol Methods 1988; 20: 175–86.
Yang Q, Lu JT, Zhou AW, Wang B, He GW, Chen MZ . Antinociceptive effect of astragalosides and its mechanism of action. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2001; 22: 809–12.
Manning BH . A lateralized deficit in morphine antinociception after unilateral inactivation of the central amygdala. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 9453–70.
Noble F, Blommaert A, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Roques BP . A selective CCKB receptor antagonist potentiates μ-, but not δ-opioid receptor-mediated antinociception in the formalin test. Eur J Pharmacol 1995; 273: 145–51.
Przewlocka B, Mika J, Labuz D, Toth G, Przewlocki R . Spinal analgesic action of endomorphines in acute, inflammatory and neuropathic pain in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1999; 367: 189–96.
Wheeler AH, Cowan A . Standardization of the rat paw formalin test for the evaluation of analgesics. Psychopharmacology 1991; 104: 35–44.
Jett MF, Michelson S . The formalin test in rats: validation of an automated system. Pain 1996; 64: 19–25.
Jourdan D, Ardid D, Bardin L, Bardin M, Neuzere D, Lanphouthacoul L, et al. A new automated method of pain scoring in the formalin test in rats. Pain 1997; 71: 265–70.
Yaksh TL, Ozaki G, McCumber D, Rathbun M, Svensson C, Malkmus S, et al. An automated flinch detecting system for use in the formalin nociceptive bioassay. J Appl Physiol 2001; 90: 2386–402.
Jourdan D, Alloui A, Eschalier A . Pharmacological validation of an automated method of pain scoring in the formalin test in rats. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 1999; 42: 163–70.
Li Y, Yuan B, Tang JS, Xiang RK . A simple automated detecting system for formalin test in rats. Chin J Neurosci 2001; 17: 145–8.
Zimmermann M . Ethical guideline for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain 1983; 16: 109–10.
Abbott, FV, Franklin KBJ, Westbrook RF . The formalin test: scoring properties of the first and second phases of the pain response in rats. Pain 1995; 60: 91–102.
Coderre TJ, Fundytus ME, McKenna JE, Dalal S, Melzack R . The formalin test: a validation of the weighted-scores method of behavioural pain rating. Pain 1993; 54: 43–50.
Dickenson AH, Sullivan AF . Subcutaneous formalin-induced activity of dorsal horn neurons in the rat: differential response to an intrathecal opiate administered pre or post formalin. Pain 1987; 30: 349–60.
Malmberg AB, Yaksh TL . Antinociceptive actions of spinal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents on the formalin test in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992; 263: 136–46.
Bittencourt AL, Takahashi RN . Mazindol and lidocaine are antinociceptive in the mouse formalin model: involvement of dopamine receptor. Eur J Pharmacol 1997; 330: 109–13.
Tokunaga A, Doi M, Senba E . Effects of local anaesthesia on formalin-induced Fos expression in the rat dorsal horn. Neuroreport 1995; 6: 2301–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No 30270453).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, Yf., Wang, J., Huo, Fq. et al. Validation of a simple automated movement detection system for formalin test in rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin 26, 39–45 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7254.2005.00001.x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7254.2005.00001.x