Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Enriching suicide gene bearing tumor cells for an increased bystander effect

Abstract

The success of cancer gene therapies requiring in vivo gene transfer is severely hampered by the low efficacy of gene transfer, which has been difficult to improve. We therefore established a novel strategy to increase the share of transduced cells post gene transfer. We hypothesized that in vivo selection of tumor cells transduced with a suicide gene effectively enriches these cells within a tumor, thus allowing for an increased bystander effect after the prodrug is given, leading to enhanced eradication of tumor cells. We reasoned that in vivo enrichment should be achieved by exploiting the metabolism of the suicide gene product. For this ‘enrichment–eradication’ strategy we chose a fusion gene of cytosine deaminase and uracil phosphoribosyl transferase. Positive selection (enrichment) was to be achieved by concurrently giving N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate, an inhibitor of pyrimidine de novo synthesis, which leads to pyrimidine depletion-mediated death of non-transduced cells, and cytosine, to rescue fusion gene expressing cells via the pyrimidine salvage pathway. Negative selection (eradication) was to be induced by giving the prodrug 5-fluorocytosine. Indeed, murine NXS2 neuroblastoma cells transduced with the fusion gene were effectively enriched in vitro, leading to a near-complete bystander effect. In vivo enrichment–eradication of NXS2 cells led to decreased tumor growth. This proof-of-principle study shows that enrichment–eradication may compensate the effects of low in vivo gene transfer efficacy, a major obstacle in cancer gene therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braybrooke JP, Slade A, Deplanque G, Harrop R, Madhusudan S, Forster MD et al. Phase I study of MetXia-P450 gene therapy and oral cyclophosphamide for patients with advanced breast cancer or melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 1512–1520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Immonen A, Vapalahti M, Tyynela K, Hurskainen H, Sandmair A, Vanninen R et al. AdvHSV-tk gene therapy with intravenous ganciclovir improves survival in human malignant glioma: a randomised, controlled study. Mol Ther 2004; 10: 967–972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palmer DH, Mautner V, Mirza D, Oliff S, Gerritsen W, van der Sijp JR et al. Virus-directed enzyme prodrug therapy: intratumoral administration of a replication-deficient adenovirus encoding nitroreductase to patients with resectable liver cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1546–1552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lang FF, Bruner JM, Fuller GN, Aldape K, Prados MD, Chang S et al. Phase I trial of adenovirus-mediated p53 gene therapy for recurrent glioma: biological and clinical results. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 2508–2518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeimet AG, Marth C . Why did p53 gene therapy fail in ovarian cancer? Lancet Oncol 2003; 4: 415–422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freytag SO, Khil M, Stricker H, Peabody J, Menon M, DePeralta-Venturina M et al. Phase I study of replication-competent adenovirus-mediated double suicide gene therapy for the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 4968–4976.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rainov NG . A phase III clinical evaluation of herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase and ganciclovir gene therapy as an adjuvant to surgical resection and radiation in adults with previously untreated glioblastoma multiforme. Hum Gene Ther 2000; 11: 2389–2401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ram Z, Culver KW, Oshiro EM, Viola JJ, DeVroom HL, Otto E et al. Therapy of malignant brain tumors by intratumoral implantation of retroviral vector-producing cells. Nat Med 1997; 3: 1354–1361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman SM, Abboud CN, Whartenby KA, Packman CH, Koeplin DS, Moolten FL et al. The ‘bystander effect’: tumor regression when a fraction of the tumor mass is genetically modified. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 5274–5283.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mesnil M, Yamasaki H . Bystander effect in herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase/ganciclovir cancer gene therapy: role of gap-junctional intercellular communication. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 3989–3999.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huber BE, Austin EA, Richards CA, Davis ST, Good SS . Metabolism of 5-fluorocytosine to 5-fluorouracil in human colorectal tumor cells transduced with the cytosine deaminase gene: significant antitumor effects when only a small percentage of tumor cells express cytosine deaminase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 8302–8306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mullen CA, Kilstrup M, Blaese RM . Transfer of the bacterial gene for cytosine deaminase to mammalian cells confers lethal sensitivity to 5-fluorocytosine: a negative selection system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 33–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Austin EA, Huber BE . A first step in the development of gene therapy for colorectal carcinoma: cloning, sequencing, and expression of Escherichia coli cytosine deaminase. Mol Pharmacol 1993; 43: 380–387.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huber BE, Austin EA, Good SS, Knick VC, Tibbels S, Richards CA . In vivo antitumor activity of 5-fluorocytosine on human colorectal carcinoma cells genetically modified to express cytosine deaminase. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 4619–4626.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kievit E, Bershad E, Ng E, Sethna P, Dev I, Lawrence TS et al. Superiority of yeast over bacterial cytosine deaminase for enzyme/prodrug gene therapy in colon cancer xenografts. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 1417–1421.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandha HS, Martin LA, Rigg A, Hurst HC, Stamp GW, Sikora K et al. Genetic prodrug activation therapy for breast cancer: a phase I clinical trial of erbB-2-directed suicide gene expression. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2180–2189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Freytag SO, Stricker H, Pegg J, Paielli D, Pradhan DG, Peabody J et al. Phase I study of replication-competent adenovirus-mediated double-suicide gene therapy in combination with conventional-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed, intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 7497–7506.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wei K, Huber BE . Cytosine deaminase gene as a positive selection marker. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 3812–3816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shiau AL, Yang HM, Wu P, Wu CL . Provision of positive and negative selections in retroviral vectors containing the cytosine deaminase gene. Gene Therapy 1998; 5: 1571–1574.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Erbs P, Regulier E, Kintz J, Leroy P, Poitevin Y, Exinger F et al. In vivo cancer gene therapy by adenovirus-mediated transfer of a bifunctional yeast cytosine deaminase/uracil phosphoribosyltransferase fusion gene. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 3813–3822.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Beltinger C, Fulda S, Walczak H, Debatin KM . TRAIL enhances thymidine kinase/ganciclovir gene therapy of neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Gene Ther 2002; 9: 372–381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Syrovets T, Gschwend JE, Buchele B, Laumonnier Y, Zugmaier W, Genze F et al. Inhibition of IkappaB kinase activity by acetyl-boswellic acids promotes apoptosis in androgen-independent PC-3 prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 6170–6180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harte RJ, Matthews JC, O'Reilly SM, Tilsley DW, Osman S, Brown G et al. Tumor, normal tissue, and plasma pharmacokinetic studies of fluorouracil biomodulation with N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate, folinic acid, and interferon alfa. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1580–1588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thorne SH, Hermiston T, Kim D . Oncolytic virotherapy: approaches to tumor targeting and enhancing antitumor effects. Semin Oncol 2005; 32: 537–548.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mathis TM, Stoff-Khalili MA, Curiel DT . Oncolytic adenoviruses – selective retargeting to tumor cells. Oncogene 2005; 24: 7775–7791.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants from the Deutsche Krebshilfe (to CB and KMD) and the Kind-Philipp-Stiftung für Leukamieforschung (to CB and MMU).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Beltinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Unger, M., Wahl, J., Ushmorov, A. et al. Enriching suicide gene bearing tumor cells for an increased bystander effect. Cancer Gene Ther 14, 30–38 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cgt.7700995

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cgt.7700995

Keywords

Search

Quick links