Abstract
An extensive PM monitoring study was conducted during the 1998 Baltimore PM Epidemiology-Exposure Study of the Elderly. One goal was to investigate the mass concentration comparability between various monitoring instrumentation located across residential indoor, residential outdoor, and ambient sites. Filter-based (24-h integrated) samplers included Federal Reference Method Monitors (PM2.5-FRMs), Personal Environmental Monitors (PEMs), Versatile Air Pollution Samplers (VAPS), and cyclone-based instruments. Tapered element oscillating microbalances (TEOMs) collected real-time data. Measurements were collected on a near-daily basis over a 28-day period during July–August, 1998. The selected monitors had individual sampling completeness percentages ranging from 64% to 100%. Quantitation limits varied from 0.2 to 5.0 µg/m3. Results from matched days indicated that mean individual PM10 and PM2.5 mass concentrations differed by less than 3 µg/m3 across the instrumentation and within each respective size fraction. PM10 and PM2.5 mass concentration regression coefficients of determination between the monitors often exceeded 0.90 with coarse (PM10–2.5) comparisons revealing coefficients typically well below 0.40. Only one of the outdoor collocated PM2.5 monitors (PEM) provided mass concentration data that were statistically different from that produced by a protoype PM2.5 FRM sampler. The PEM had a positive mass concentration bias ranging up to 18% relative to the FRM prototype.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development funded and managed the research described here under EPA-NERL contract #68-D5-0040 to the Research Triangle Institute. It has been subjected to Agency review and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WILLIAMS, R., SUGGS, J., RODES, C. et al. Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 10, 497–505 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500138
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500138
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
The design and field implementation of the Detroit Exposure and Aerosol Research Study
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2009)
-
Estimation of ambient and non-ambient components of particulate matter exposure from a personal monitoring panel study
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2006)
-
Particulate matter and heart rate variability among elderly retirees: the Baltimore 1998 PM study
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2001)
-
The relationships between personal PM exposures for elderly populations and indoor and outdoor concentrations for three retirement center scenarios
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2001)