Academic-coordination roles can be even harder to sell on a CV than teaching responsibilities (see Nature doi.org/b7gn; 2017). These include activities such as mentoring students; organizing research projects, meetings, workshops and talks; managing data; and running a lab group's websites and social media — all of which steal crucial time away from research.
Paradoxically, it therefore pays the coordinator (typically a female or early-career scientist, who may already be at a disadvantage compared with their peers) to put their research career first and to spend as little time as possible on 'unprofitable' coordinating tasks. This renders a disservice to students, outreach and, ultimately, research itself.
The problem lies in academia undervaluing such skills and non-research-related responsibilities. In our view, these contributions should be recognized on a par with publications and winning grants, and as an advantage — not a disadvantage — to a research career.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Slade, E., Riutta, T. Value coordinating roles in research. Nature 546, 33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/546033b
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/546033b