Christopher Golden and colleagues argue that farmed fish contribute little to global food security because they are “mostly exported to the wealthy countries of Europe and North America” (Nature 534, 317–320; 2016). In fact, more than 90% of farmed fish produced in China, India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Egypt, the Philippines and Myanmar — some of the world's largest aquaculture-producing developing countries — remains in domestic markets (see go.nature.com/2dqwwh).
Aquaculture products are more accessible to the poor in many developing nations than ever before (K. A. Toufique and B. Belton World Dev. 64, 609–620; 2014). And the aquaculture boom of the past two decades has stabilized world fish prices (S. Tveterås et al. PLoS ONE 7, e36731; 2012).
The realities of the supply and demand of aquaculture products mean that these now complement capture fisheries for global food and nutrition security.Footnote 1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belton, B., Bush, S. & Little, D. Are farmed fish just for the wealthy?. Nature 538, 171 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/538171d
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/538171d
This article is cited by
-
Fisheries and Policy Implications for Human Nutrition
Current Environmental Health Reports (2020)
-
Mapping the global potential for marine aquaculture
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2017)