Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of apomorphine SL (apo SL) 2 and 3 mg, using a dose-optimisation regime in 110 Asian men with erectile dysfunction (ED) during a 10-week open-label study. Based on daily diaries kept by each patient, 63% showed an improvement in their sexual life. Patient responses to the International Index for Erection Function 15 questionnaires showed that there was an improvement in erectile function from baseline score after treatment with apo SL (from 15.9 to 20.4), and intercourse satisfaction (from 7.7 to 9.9), as well as slight improvements in orgasmic function (from 6.8 to 7.5) and total satisfaction (from 41.9 to 50.8). There was no marked improvement seen in sexual desire. In conclusion, apo SL is safe and efficacious in the treatment of ED in this patient population, irrespective of underlying diseases and concomitant medications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thai Erectile Dysfunction Epidemiologic Study Group (TEDES). An epidemiological study of erectile dysfunction in Thailand (Part 1: prevalence). J Med Assoc Thai 2000; 83: 872–879.
Thai Erectile Dysfunction Epidemiological Study Group. Kongkanand A . Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in Thailand. Int J Androl 2000; 23(Suppl 2): 77–80.
Von Keitz AT et al. A European multicentre study to evaluate the tolerability of apomorphine sublingual administered in a forced dose-escalation regimen in patients with erectile dysfunction. BJU Int 2002; 89: 409–415.
Dula E, et al. Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose and dose-optimization regimens of sublingual apomorphine versus placebo in men with erectile dysfunction. The Apomorphine Study Group. Urology 2000; 56: 130–135.
Rosen RC et al. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–830.
Dula E, Bukofzer S, Perdok R, George M . Double-blind, crossover comparison of 3 mg apomorphine SL with placebo and with 4 mg apomorphine SL in male erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol 2001; 39: 558–564.
Mulhall JP, Bukofzer S, Edmonds AL, George M . An open-label, uncontrolled dose-optimization study of sublingual apomorphine in erectile dysfunction. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1260–1271.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kongkanand, A., Opanuraks, J., Tantiwongse, K. et al. Evaluating dose regimens of apomorphine, an open-label study. Int J Impot Res 15 (Suppl 2), S10–S12 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900992
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900992
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Apomorphine for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Archives of Sexual Behavior (2020)
-
Centrally acting drugs for erectile dysfunction: Do they have a future?
Current Sexual Health Reports (2007)