Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Large-scale tectonic deformation inferred from small earthquakes

An Erratum to this article was published on 17 July 1997

Abstract

It is a long-standing question whether the focal mechanisms of small earthquakes can be used to provide information about tectonic deformation on a regional scale. Here we address this question by using a 28-year record of seismicity in the San Francisco Bay area to compare the strain released by small earthquakes with geological, geodetic and plate-tectonic measurements of deformation in this region. We show that on a small spatial scale, the strain released by small earthquakes is closely related to specific geological features. But when averaged over a regional scale, strain release more closely follows the regional pattern of tectonic deformation: this relationship holds for all but the largest earthquakes, indicating that the earthquake strain is self-similar1,2 over a broad range of earthquake magnitudes. The lack of self-similarity observed for the largest earthquakes suggests that the time interval studied is not large enough to sample a complete set of events—the fault with the highest probability3 for hosting one such missing event is the Hayward fault.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mandelbrot, B. B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, San Francisco, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Turcotte, D. L. Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Working Group on Californian Earthquake Probabiities Probabilities of Large Earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Region, California (Circ. 1053, US Geol. Survey, 1990).

  4. Kostrov, V. V. Earth Phys. 1, 23–40 (1974).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Menahem, A. & Singh, J. J. Seismic Waves and Sources (Springer, New York, 1981).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. King, G. C. P. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 288, 197–212 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelson, K. I., Lettis, W. R. & Lisowski, M. Proc. 2nd Conf. on Earthquake Hazards in the Eastern San Francisco Bay Area 31–38 (Spec. Publ. 113, California Dept. of Conservation, Div. of Mines and Geology, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ellsworth, W. Prof. Pap. US Geol. Surv. 1515, 153–181 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oppenheimer, D. H., Reasenberg, P. A. & Simpson, R. W. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 9007–9026 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oppenheimer, D. H., Bakun, W. H. & Lindh, A. G. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 8483–8489 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bakun, W. H., King, G. C. P. & Cockerham, R. S. in Earthquake Source Mechanics 195–207 (Geophys. Monogr. 37, (Maurice Ewing 6), Am. Geophys. Union, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. King, G. C. P., Lindh, A. G. & Oppenheimer, D. H. Geophys. Res. Lett. 17, 1449–1452 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. King, G. C. P., Oppenheimer, D. & Amelung, F. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 128, 55–64 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. King, G. C. P. Pure Appl. Geophys. 121, 761–815 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Amelung, F. & King, G. C. P. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 507–510 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lisowski, M., Savage, J. C. & Prescott, W. H. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 8369–8389 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ekström, G. & England, P. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 10231–10257 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F. & Stein, S. Geophys. J. Int. 101, 425–478 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F. & Stein, S. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 2191–2194 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Page, B. M. in Proc. 2nd Conf. on Earthquake Hazards in the Eastern San Francisco Bay Area 1–7 (Spec. Publ. 113, California Dept. of Conservation, Div. of Mines and Geology, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Page, B. M. & Brocher, T. M. Geology 21, 635–638 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones, D. L. et al. Tectonics 13, 561–574 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zoback, M. D. et al. Science 238, 1105–1111 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams, S. D. P. thesis, Univ. Durham (1995).

  25. Amelung, F. thesis, Univ. Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg (1996).

  26. Gephart, J. W. & D. W. Forsyth J. Geophys. Res. 89, 9305–9320 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Michael, A. J. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 11517–11526 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rivera, L. & Cisternas, A. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 80, 600–614 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Michael, A. J., Ellsworth, W. L. & Oppenheimer, D. H. Geophy. Res. Lett. 17, 1441–1444 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Beroza, G. C. & Zoback, M. D. Science 259, 210–213 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zoback, M. D. & Beroza, G. C. Geology 21, 181–185 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Reasenberg, P. A. & Oppenheimer, D. H. US Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep. 85–739 (1985).

  33. Bakun, W. H. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74, 439–458 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amelung, F., King, G. Large-scale tectonic deformation inferred from small earthquakes. Nature 386, 702–705 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/386702a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/386702a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing