Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence

Abstract

WHAT features in a stereogram define the disparities that lead to stereoscopic depth? The usual answer is that luminance-defined edges from the two eyes are matched and produce depth perception1,2. But parts of an object may be occluded by other objects and absent from one eye's view. It was suggested that unpaired monocular elements might signal occlusion in depth, and the qualitative perception of depth associated with unmatched elements has been shown to be consistent with the geometry of occlusion3–5. We designed a stereogram that simulates a particular in front of a large black rectangle pasted on a white background. The position of the occluder is adjusted so that its left edge obscures the left-hand edge of the black rectangle in the right eye view and its right edge obscures the right-hand edge of the black rectangle in the left eye view. We report here that quantitative stereopsis can be seen from this stereogram, even though there are no binocular corresponding luminance edges to match.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Julesz, B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marr, D. & Poggio, T. A. Proc. R. Soc. B204, 301–328 (1979).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shimojo, S. & Nakayama, K. Vision Res. 30, 69–80 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakayama, K. & Shimojo, S. Vision Res. 30, 1811–1825 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakayama, K. & Shimojo, S. Cold Spring Harb Symp. quant. Biol. 55, 911–924 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, C. S. & Gregory, R. L. Perception 2, 235–247 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramachandran, V. S. Percept. Psychophys. 39, 361–373 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramachandran, V. S. & Cavanagh, P. Nature 317, 527–530 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramachandran, V. S., Rao, V. M. & Vidyasagar, T. R. Nature 242, 412–414 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kellman, P. J. & Shipley, T. F. Cognitive Psychology 23, 141–221 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Treisman, A. Q. J. exp. Psychol. 14, 23–37 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barlow, H. B., Blakemore, C. & Pettigrew, J. D. J. Physiol., Lond. 193, 327–342 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Poggio, G. F. & Fischer, B. J. Neurophyslot. 40, 1392–1407 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Takeichi, H., Watanabe, T. & Shimojo, S. Perception 21, 177–184 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, L., Stevenson, S. & Schor, C. Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence. Nature 367, 66–69 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/367066a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/367066a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing