Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Discrepancy between geological and geodetic deformation rates in the Ventura basin

Abstract

SPACE geodesy provides a new tool for measuring neotectonic deformation which, when combined with geological and geophysical observations and models, can be used to infer rates and styles of deformation. In the Ventnra basin region of southern California, the geodetically measured convergence rates of 7–10 mm yr−1 (ref. 1) are significantly lower than the 20–25 mm yr−1 estimated from geological data2,3. Here we investigate the possible implications of this discrepancy. It might be, for example, that temporal variations cause the short- and long-term convergence rates to differ. But if this were the case we would expect to observe the long-term rate by extending the geodetic measurements over a broader region, yet only 11 ± 3 mm yr−1 of regional convergence is observed4. Our preferred explanation of the discrepancy is that the geological models require revision, and to this end we present two deformation models that satisfy both the geological and geodetic constraints. Our modelling suggests that the faults bounding the basin are locked at the surface, but are slipping at depths below 2–5 km.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donnellan, A., Hager, B. H., King, R. W. & Herring, T. A. J. geophys. Res. 98 (in the press).

  2. Yeats, R. S. J. geophys. Res. 88, 569–583 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huftile, G. J. & Yeats, R. S. J. geophys. Res. (submitted).

  4. Feigl, K. et al. J. geophys. Res. 98 (in the press).

  5. Eberhart-Phillips, D., Lisowski, M. & Zoback, M. D. J. geophys. Res. 95, 1139–1153 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Namson, J. & Davis, T. Geology 16, 675–679 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Levi, S. & Yeats, R. S. Tectonics 12, 688–702 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson, J. & Molnar, P. J. geophys. Res. 95, 22073–22087 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Molnar, P. Technical report (Southern California Earthquake Center, Univ. Southern California, Los Angeles, 1993).

  10. Yeats, R. S. & Huftile, G. J. EOS 73, 590 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Suppe, J. & Medwedeff, D. A. Eclog. geol. Helv. 83, 409–454 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Webb, T. H. & Kanamori, H. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 75, 737–757 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Larsen, S. C., Agnew, D. C. & Hager, B. H. J. geophys. Res. 98, 2119–2133 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Larson, K. M. & Webb, F. H. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1491–1494 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. DeRito, R. F., Lachenbruch, A. H., Moses, T. H. & Munroe, R. J. J. geophys. Res. 94, 681–699 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bryant, A. S. & Jones, L. M. J. geophys. Res. 97, 437–447 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis, T. L., Namson, J. & Yerkes, R. F. J. geophys. Res. 94, 9644–9664 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanamori, H. & Anderson, D. L. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 65, 1073–1096 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stein, R. S. & Yeats, R. S. Sci. Am. 260(6), 48–57 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donnellan, A., Hager, B. & King, R. Discrepancy between geological and geodetic deformation rates in the Ventura basin. Nature 366, 333–336 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/366333a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/366333a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing