Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A selfish strategy of social insect workers that promotes social cohesion

Abstract

SOCIAL insect colonies are in many ways analogous to organisms1, because kin-selected workers act selflessly and cohesively to promote the fitness of a few reproductive members2,3. But workers can evolve selfish strategies which create reproductive conflict, reducing the functional integrity of colonies. For example, they can lay unfertilized (male) eggs3–6, compete directly with the queen to lay fertilized (female) eggs7, suppress the reproduction of other workers8,9, choose among several queens10 and generally favour closer over more distant kin11. Conflicts over the sex ratio may be especially pervasive, even in highly eusocial insects. The unusually high relatedness (r = 3/4) of female hymenopteran workers to their full sisters means that workers should prefer more female-biased sex ratios than do queens4. The worker preference for females should be exerted most strongly on colonies where they are most likely to be full sisters, leaving male production to colonies where this advantage least applies4,12–14; this prediction is supported by studies in ants and bees12,15–17. Here we show that when colonies havezmultiple queens born in the same nest, the selfish worker sex-ratio strategy has a paradoxical side-effect which strongly promotes social cohesion. This strategy accounts for the peculiar colony cycle of epiponine wasps, and may be responsible for the maintenance of eusociality in this group.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wheeler, W. M. J. Morph. 22, 307–325 (1911).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamilton, W. D. J. theor. Biol. 7, 1–16, 17–52 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton, W. D. A. Rev. ecol. Syst. 3, 193–232 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Trivers, R. L. & Hare, H. Science 191, 249–263 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bourke, A. F. G. Q. Rev. Biol. 63, 291–311 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choe, J. C. in Advances in Myrmecology (ed. Trager, J. C.) 163–187 (Brill, Leiden, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sommer, K. & Hölldobler, B. Naturwissenschaften 79, 470–472 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Starr, C. K. in Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (ed. Smith, R. L.) 427–464 (Academic, Orlando, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Ratnieks, F. L. W. & Visscher, P. K. Nature 342, 796–797 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Forsyth, A. Am. Nat. 116, 895–898 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Getz, W. in Kin Recognition (ed. Hepper, P.) 358–412 (Cambridge Univ. Press, UK, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Boomsma, J. J. & Grafen, A. Evolution 44, 1026–1034 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boomsma, J. J. & Grafen, A. J. evol. Biol. 3, 383–407 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pamilo, P. Am. Nat. 137, 83–107 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ward, P. S. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12, 301–307 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boomsma, J. J. Trends ecol. Evol. 6, 92–95 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mueller, U. G. Science 254, 442–444 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Queller, D. C., Strassmann, J. E. & Hughes, C. R. Science 242, 1155–1157 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wade, M. J. J. theor. Biol. 112, 109–121 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carpenter, J. in Biological Relationships Between Africa and South America (ed. Goldblatt, P.) (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, in the press).

  21. Richards, O. W. The Social Wasps of the Americas Excluding the Vespinae (British Museum (Natural History), London, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jeanne, R. L. A. Rev. Ent. 25, 371–396 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeanne, R. L. in The Social Biology of Wasps (eds Ross, K. & Matthews, R.) 191–231 (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  24. West-Eberhard, M. J. in Social Insects in the Environment Proc. 11th int. Congr. IUSSI (eds Veeresh, G. K., Mallik, B. & Viraktamath, C. A.) 254–255 (Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Strassmann, J. E. et al. Anim. Behav. 42, 461–470 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Queller, D. C. et al. Behavl Ecol. 4, 7–13 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gastreich, K. R., Strassmann, J. E. & Queller, D. C. Ecol. Ethol. Evol. (in the press).

  28. West-Eberhard, M. J. in Proc. 7th int. Congr. IUSSI 396–403 (1973).

  29. West-Eberhard, M. J. Science 200, 441–443 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. West-Eberhard, M. J. in Natural Selection and Social Behaviour (eds Alexander, R. D. & Tinkle, D. W.) 3–17 (Chiron, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Forsyth, A. B. thesis, Harvard Univ. (1978).

  32. Queller, D. C. & Goodnight, K. F. Evolution 43, 258–275 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Queller, D., Strassmann, J., Solís, C. et al. A selfish strategy of social insect workers that promotes social cohesion. Nature 365, 639–641 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/365639a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/365639a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing