Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Vast Neogene laminated diatom mat deposits from the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean

Abstract

THE eastern equatorial Pacific upwelling region is responsible for up to 50% of global 'new' production1 and is regarded as a barometer of ocean change. Here we report evidence, from several sediment cores in the region, for repeated episodes of increased equatorial primary production between 15 and 4.4 million years ago, on a scale that is undocumented in the modern ocean. Mats of the diatom Thalassiothrix were rapidly deposited as successive laminations at rates exceeding 10cm per thousand years; mat deposits can be correlated for distances of more than 2,000 km. It is surprising that the laminations were preserved at all: conventional models suggest that bioturbation caused by the benthic sediment community will disrupt such laminations unless there is insufficient oxygen in the water to support the biological activity. In this case, however, the strength of the mats and the scale of their deposition may have overwhelmed the benthos, so that the laminations were preserved by physical means. These remarkable deposits provide a unique window into the Neogene tropical ocean–climate system, and should enable quantification of ancient deep-sea fluxes and the study of short-term (sub-Milankovitch) variability in the ocean.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chavez, F. P. & Barber, R. T. Deep-Sea Res. 34, 1229–1243 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wyrtki, K. J. phys. Oceanogr. 11, 1205–1214 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chavez, F. P., Buck, K. R. & Barber, R. T. Deep-Sea Res. 37, 1733–1752 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayer, L. & Theyer, F. Init. Rep. DSDP Leg 85 (1985).

  5. Mayer, L., Pisias, N. P. & Janecek, T. R. Init. Repts. ODP 138 (1992).

  6. Sancetta, C. Init. Repts DSDP 68, 301–309 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sancetta, C. Init. Repts DSDP 69, 311–320 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hendy, N. I. Discovery Repts 16 151–364 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smayda, T. J. Oikos 9, 158–191 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hasle, G. R. & Semina, H. J. Diatom Res. 2, 175–192 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hallegraef, G. M. Diatom Res. 1, 57–80 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clemons, M. J. & Miller, C. B. Deep-Sea Res. 31, 85–95 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez, L., Silver, M. W., King, J. & Alldredge, A. L. Science 221, 152–154 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sancetta, C., Villareal, T. & Falkowski, P. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36, 1452–1457 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barber, R. T. US JGOFS News 4(1), 1–6 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mayer, L. Nature 352, 148–150 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayer, L. A., Shipley, T. H. & Winterer, F. I. Science 233, 761–764 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hay, B. J. Paleoceanography 3, 491–508 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thorton, S. E. Spec. Publ. geol. soc. Lond. 15, 377–394 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kemp, A. E. S. Proc. ODP Sci. Res. 112, 43–58 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Calvert, S. E. J Geol. 74, 546–565 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. King, S., Kemp, A. E. S. & Murray, J. W. Proc. ODP Sci. Res. 138 (submitted).

  23. Gardner, J. V. & Burckle, L. H. Micropaleontology 21, 236–242 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gombos, A. M. Init. Rep. DSDP Leg. 73, 487–494 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Muller, D. W., Hodell, D. A. & Ciesielski, P. F. Proc. ODP Sci. Res. 114, 43–58 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schrader, H. & Matherne, A. Micropaleontology 27, 191–203 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Farrell, J. W. & Prell, W. L. Paleoceanography 4, 447–466 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baldauf, J. G. & Barron J. A. in Geological History of the Polar Oceans: Arctic versus Antarctic (eds Bliel. U. & Thiede, J.) 575–607 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Barron, J. A. & Baldauf, J. G. in Pacific Neogene Events: Their Timing, Nature and Interrelationship (ed. Tsuchi, R.) 43–63 (Univ. Tokyo Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Woodruff, F. & Savin, S. M. Paleoceanography 3, 87–140 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Leinen, M. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. I 90, 801–803 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brewster, N. A. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. I 91, 337–347 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kemp, A., Baldauf, J. Vast Neogene laminated diatom mat deposits from the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean. Nature 362, 141–144 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/362141a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/362141a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing